51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Poster: found
      Is Open Access

      A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives. Analysis of the main methods of psychosocial rehabilitation (PsR) and development of a systematic approach to the problem of evaluating its effectiveness.

          Methods. Psychometric, sociological, system analysis methods and algorithms of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) [1, 2].

          Results. The analysis of problems that arise when evaluating the effectiveness of PsR, the choice of evaluation criteria and methodological tools that are most often used for this purpose. It is shown that for an objective assessment of the results of rehabilitation, it is necessary to take into account the hierarchical structure of both the assessment problems and the information to be processed. This information includes quantitative indicators (age, duration of illness, frequency of hospitalizations, results of neurobiological studies), as well as non-numeric (psychometric) indicators (severity of psychopathological symptoms, characteristics of compliance, social behavior, and the patient's environment). The proposed approach to assessing the effectiveness of PsR provides for the development of local and integral criteria for the effectiveness of rehabilitation, based on a multi-dimensional, hierarchical consideration of mental pathology using the AHP algorithms.

          Conclusions. When solving problems evaluation of the effectiveness of the PsR must use a systematic approach that allows to generate local and integral evaluation of the effectiveness of the PsR based on the individual program of rehabilitation and weightiness of the resulting estimates. References. 1. Solokhina T.A., Mitikhin V.G., Yastrebova V.V., Tiumenkova G.V. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2019, 119(12): 154-161, 2. Mitikhin V.G., Solokhina T.A. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2019, 119(2): 49-54. doi:10.17116/jnevro201911902149

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          ScienceOpen Posters
          ScienceOpen
          30 January 2021
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Mental Health Research Centre, Moscow, Russian Federations
          Article
          10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPCV1YG.v1

          This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

          The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

          Medicine

          hierarchy, psychiatry, schizophrenia, psychometric, evaluation, effectiveness, rehabilitation

          Comments

          Comment on this article