450
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender bias in student evaluation of teaching or a mirage?

      Preprint
      research-article
      This is not the latest version for this article. If you want to read the latest version, click here.
        1 , , 1
      ScienceOpen Preprints
      ScienceOpen
      student evaluation of teaching, gender bias, SET, small samples, outliers, generalization, statistical power, transparency
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            In a recent small sample study, Khazan et al. (2020) examined SET ratings received by one female teaching (TA) assistant who assisted with teaching two sections of the same online course, one section under her true gender and one section under false/opposite gender. Khazan et al. concluded that their study demonstrated gender bias against female TA even though they found no statistical difference in SET ratings between male vs. female TA ( p = .73). To claim gender bias, Khazan et al. ignored their overall findings and focused on distribution of six negative SET ratings and claimed, without reporting any statistical test results, that (a) female students gave more positive ratings to male TA than female TA, (b) female TA received five times as many negative ratings than the male TA, and (c) female students gave most low scores to female TA. We conducted the missing statistical tests and found no evidence supporting Khazan et al.s claims. We also requested Khazan et al.s data to formally examine them for outliers and to re-analyze the data with and without the outliers. Khazan et al. refused. We read off the data from their Figure 1 and filled in several values using the brute force, exhaustive search constrained by the summary statistics reported by Khazan et al.. Our re-analysis revealed six outliers and no evidence of gender bias. In fact, when the six outliers were removed, the female TA was rated higher than male TA but non-significantly so.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            ScienceOpen Preprints
            ScienceOpen
            27 November 2020
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Department of Psychology, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
            Article
            10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPFXXC8.v1
            a91de759-273b-4edb-bd12-b3e5d78ebfd3

            This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .


            All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
            Education
            transparency,student evaluation of teaching,gender bias,SET,small samples,outliers,generalization,statistical power

            Comments

            Comment on this article