The possibility of the no-hair theorem being violated

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Recently, one of my articles got some interesting results about Kerr black hole superradiantstability. That result contained some conclusions that violated the \No Hair Theorem". We knowthat the No Hair theorem" is the inference product of general relativity. I boldly believe that itmay lead to a little progress in cosmological research.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: ScienceOpen Preprints

Publisher: ScienceOpen

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 30 March 2020

Affiliations

[1 ] wxchen4277@qq.com

Article

DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPJRNRL.v1

License:

This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

Data availability:

ScienceOpen disciplines: Astronomy & Astrophysics

Keywords: superradiant stability, numerical solution, No-hair theorem

Comments

Wen-Xiang Chen wrote:

I submitted the <Superradiant stability of the Kerr black hole> (That paper might violate the black hole no-hair theorem) to the <International Journal of Modern Physics D>（International Journal of Modern Physics D 29(01)，DOI: 10.1142/S0218271820500091

）. Now that the article has been accepted, I wrote an inference about the result of that paper (indicating that if the result is verified to be correct, the no hair theorem may be problematic).

2020-04-04 04:34 UTC

The possibility of the no-hair theorem being violated

Read this article at