The possibility of the no-hair theorem being violated

Recently, one of my articles got some interesting results about Kerr black hole superradiantstability. That result contained some conclusions that violated the \No Hair Theorem". We knowthat the No Hair theorem" is the inference product of general relativity. I boldly believe that itmay lead to a little progress in cosmological research.

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Title: ScienceOpen Preprints

Publisher: ScienceOpen

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 30 March 2020

Affiliations

[1 ] wxchen4277@qq.com

Author information

Wen-Xiang Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0560-8280

Article

DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPJRNRL.v1

SO-VID: 59684fca-0345-4b73-bcb9-52fd61b54e84

License:

This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

History

Date received : 30 March 2020

ScienceOpen disciplines: Astronomy & Astrophysics

Keywords: No-hair theorem,numerical solution,superradiant stability

Comments

Wen-Xiang Chen wrote:

I submitted the <Superradiant stability of the Kerr black hole> (That paper might violate the black hole no-hair theorem) to the <International Journal of Modern Physics D>（International Journal of Modern Physics D 29(01)，DOI: 10.1142/S0218271820500091

）. Now that the article has been accepted, I wrote an inference about the result of that paper (indicating that if the result is verified to be correct, the no hair theorem may be problematic).

2020-04-04 04:34 UTC