+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      For God, King, and Country: Nineteenth-Century Methodist Interpretations of the War of 1812

      London Journal of Canadian Studies

      UCL Press

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The War of 1812 almost ruined Episcopal Methodism in Upper Canada. During the War, the American itinerants were unable to travel in the land and, after the War, their detractors used their connection to America to undermine their influence in the loyal Province. This article offers two examples in order to highlight the ways in which the Methodists themselves used the war to prove their loyalty as well as their role in developing the land that would one day become Canada. The first example looks at how Methodists in the Reform party of the 1828 House of Assembly viewed their denomination’s role during and in the years following the War. The second example looks at the publication of two popular books in 1880 that defended the contribution American Methodists had made to the British war effort. These examples moved the issue of Methodist loyalty into the sphere of politics and public policy and showed how the ongoing interpretation of the War of 1812 continued to affect these Methodists throughout the nineteenth century.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          London Journal of Canadian Studies
          UCL Press
          January 2014
          : 29
          : 1

          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic. To view a copy of this license, visit

          Page count
          Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 0, Pages: 20

          Sociology, Political science, Anglo-American studies, Americas, Cultural studies, History


          Comment on this article

          London Journal of Canadian Studies
          Volume 29, Issue 1

          Similar content 85