200
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diversity or decolonization? Searching for the tools to dismantle the ‘master’s house’

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within the literature on decolonizing the curriculum, a clear distinction is frequently made between diversity and decolonization. While decolonization entails dismantling colonial forms of knowledge, including practices that racialize and categorize, diversity is a policy discourse that advocates for adding different sorts of people to reading lists and the staff and student body. As a team of staff and students, we are committed to decolonization, but we are also aware that within our discipline of political science, calls for diversity are more likely to be understood and accepted. We therefore bid for, and obtained, funding to conduct a quantitative review of our department’s reading lists in order to assess the range not only of authors, but also of topics and ideas. We found that male White authors wrote the majority of the readings, with women of colour authoring just 2.5 per cent of works on our curriculum. Our reading lists also featured disappointingly little theoretical diversity, with very little coverage of feminist, critical race or queer theory approaches, for example. We therefore used the standard methodologies and approaches of our discipline in order to point towards the silences and gaps that a decolonizing approach would seek to remedy. In this article, we explain our approach and findings. The project has been educational in the best sense and has disrupted hierarchical relationships between staff and students. It has helped us think more deeply about how data and research inform, and sometimes limit, change, as well as how the process of learning about how knowledge, including reading lists, is generated can support decolonization in itself.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Decolonization is not a metaphor

             Tuck,  E Tuck,  KW Yang (2012)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                lre
                London Review of Education
                UCL Press (UK )
                1474-8479
                9 June 2021
                : 19
                : 1
                Affiliations
                UCL, UK
                Author notes
                *Corresponding author – email: cathy.elliott@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                10.14324/LRE.19.1.19
                Copyright © 2021 Arshad, Dada, Elliott, Kalinowska, Khan, Lipiński, Vassanth, Bhandal, de Quinto Schneider, Georgis and Shilston

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                Page count
                Tables: 5, References: 48, Pages: 19
                Product
                Categories
                Special feature article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                London Review of Education
                Volume 19, Issue 1

                Similar content 137

                Most referenced authors 146