534
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      CVIA now indexed by SCOPUS from February 2024. CVIA received its first Journal Impact Factor (0.5) in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports Release. 

      Interested in becoming a CVIA published author?

      • Platinum Open Access with no APCs. 
      • Fast peer review/Fast publication online after article acceptance.

      Submissions should be made electronically at: https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/cvia-journal.

      Please refer to the Author Guidelines at https://cvia-journal.org/instructions-to-authors/ before submission.

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      AED, LifeVest Defibrillator or Hybrid Approach

      article-commentary
      , MD, MACC 1 ,
      Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
      Compuscript
      Bookmark

            Main article text

            Introduction

            Early defibrillation is critical to survival in any patient with a cardiac arrest. Electrophysiologists who implant ICDs (implantable cardioverter defibrillators) test them by fibrillating the patient followed by immediate defibrillation. This emphasizes the point that early defibrillation results in survival of these patients; CPR is done only if there is a delay in obtaining the defibrillator or if the ICD is not working.

            The standard practice for out of hospital defibrillation is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. However much has been written and discussed about the use of automated external defibrillators (AED). Not much has been written about LifeVest wearable defibrillators.

            Case Presentation

            A 21 year old female had sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring external defibrillation. When seen by our group, she was alert and oriented with no evidence of heart failure. PVCs were treated with amiodarone and beta-blockers. Cardiac catheterization revealed that left ventricular ejection fraction was less than 50% but her coronary arteries where normal.

            Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium was performed and showed late enhancement of the mesocardium of the left ventricle. The diagnosis of myocarditis was made and at that point, an automated ICD was recommended but the patient refused. An AED and life vest were then recommended to the patient and she agreed.

            What Does an AED Do?

            The AED addresses whether or not patients need an electric shock and if they do it predetermines the power level. The user cannot override the determination of the computer so the potential for misuse is minimal.

            Community based AEDs, although in many instances can save lives, do not perform as well as those in airports, airplanes or casinos.

            LifeVest

            The indications for a LifeVest include recent high risk acute myocardial infarction, after high risk coronary bypass graft surgery or PCI, patients listed for cardiac transplant with ventricular tachycardia and patients with cardiac disease from which they may recover in the new future. In patients with terminal disease and life expectancy less than 1 year, an ICD indication may be indicated but I would recommend that the patient be the one who determines that decision.

            Advantages of a LifeVest

            If the LifeVest detects a life threatening rhythm, the LifeVest alerts the patient to allow a conscious patient to prevent a shock. If the patient is unconscious the device delivers emergency defibrillation in the form of an electrical shock. The device is essentially a “Shock Box”.

            Hybrid Approach to Defibrillation

            For a patient who has myocarditis or a recent myocardial infarction in which there is a documented episode of sustained VT or VF a hybrid approach to management can be considered, for example a LifeVest and an AED.

            A hybrid approach to out of hospital defibrillation using an AED and LifeVest defibrillator may prove to be acceptable for young patients whose cardiac function may recover in a few months, as might be the case in this patient. Thus, these young patients would not have a lifelong requirement for an ICD. Examples of this type of patient include peripartum cardiomyopathy, viral myocarditis and recent myocardial infarction. The LifeVest should be worn at night and when alone. It could be taken off when the patient is in surroundings where friends and family could use the AED if necessary.

            Summary

            Early defibrillation is critical to survival in any patient with a cardiac arrest. An ICD is still the most reliable method to defibrillate the patient with out of hospital cardiac arrest. Community based AEDs although in many instances can save lives do not perform as well as those in airports, airplanes or casinos. A hybrid approach to out of hospital defibrillation using an AED and LifeVest defibrillator may prove to be acceptable for young patients whose cardiac function may recover in a few months. Thus, these young patients would not have to have a lifelong requirement for an ICD. However, if cardiac function does not improve, an ICD is recommended.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            CVIA
            Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
            CVIA
            Compuscript (Ireland )
            2009-8782
            2009-8618
            February 2019
            February 2019
            : 3
            : 4
            : 451-452
            Affiliations
            [1] 1University of Florida Medical School, Gainesville, FL, USA
            Author notes
            Correspondence: C. Richard Conti, MD, MACC, University of Florida Medical School, Gainesville, FL, USA, E-mail: conticr@ 123456medicine.ufl.edu
            Article
            cvia20170039
            10.15212/CVIA.2017.0039
            2a287b20-6daa-4672-b3be-d549e4ff6cf8
            Copyright © 2019 Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

            History
            Categories
            Commentaries

            General medicine,Medicine,Geriatric medicine,Transplantation,Cardiovascular Medicine,Anesthesiology & Pain management

            Comments

            Comment on this article