+1 Recommend
1 collections

      We are delighted to announce that CVIA has received its first Journal Impact Factor (0.5) in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports Release.

      Call for Papers

      Early-Stage Research on Innovative Technologies and Devices in Cardiovascular Diseases

      For full details see https://cvia-journal.org/call-for-papers

      Submissions should be made electronically at: https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/cvia-journal.

      Please refer to the Author Guidelines at https://cvia-journal.org/instructions-to-authors/ before submission.

      Deadline for Submission: 31 December 2023

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Identifies Impaired Longitudinal Strain as a Common Deficit in Various Cardiac Diseases



            The use of speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is becoming an increasingly useful tool in the evaluation of myocardial disease. STE software can track the motion of the specular pattern created by the interference of ultrasound with the myofibers of the heart and provide a quantitative means to evaluate subtle changes in ventricular function that often occur before changes in ventricular ejection fraction are observed. STE is most often used to measure the change in shape (strain) of myocardial segments in the circumferential, radial, and longitudinal directions. In various diseases, including coronary artery disease, aortic stenosis, and mitral regurgitation, deficits in longitudinal strain appear to occur earlier than deficits in other measures of strain or in ejection fraction. Consideration of STE measures of left ventricular contraction has the potential to significantly affect clinical management and outcomes of ischemic and valvular heart disease given the ability to separate those with asymptomatic disease who may benefit from earlier interventions than current guidelines may suggest.

            Main article text

            Measures of Left Ventricular Function

            Measures of left ventricular (LV) function are essential to the daily care of patients and in the study of cardiovascular disease. The most common measure of LV systolic function is ejection fraction (EF). Unfortunately, EF fails to identify the mechanism of LV systolic dysfunction in nearly half of patients with heart failure [1]. In patients with heart failure and preserved EF, it is common to evaluate Doppler measures of LV diastolic function. Similarly to EF, Doppler measures of diastolic function are often normal in patients with heart failure [2]. Fortunately, advances in noninvasive imaging have provided new methods to measure LV mechanics and have improved our ability to identify the LV deficit responsible for symptoms and outcomes.

            Interference of ultrasound with the myofibers of the heart creates a specular pattern in the myocardium. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) software can track the motion of this specular pattern and therefore track the motion of myocardial segments. STE can quantify the change in shape of a myocardial segment. Typically, STE is used to measure the change in shape of all myocardial segments along three orthogonal axes of the heart (radial, circumferential, and longitudinal) (Figure 1) [3]. Strain is the percent change in shape of a myocardial segment from the end of diastole to peak contraction. STE has been shown to have appropriate interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Additionally, STE measures of myocardial contractility had a reasonable level of agreement and reproducibility when software from different vendors was compared [4, 5].

            Figure 1

            Speckle Tracking Echocardiography (STE) and the Three Orthogonal Axes of the Left Ventricle.

            (A) STE. STE tracks the movement of speckles in the myocardial tissue and allows quantification of the change in shape of myocardial tissue throughout the cardiac cycle. In this example of an apical three-chamber image, the software is registering the change in shape of seven myocardial segments [basal inferolateral (BIL), mid inferolateral (MIL), apical lateral (ApL), apex, apical anterior (ApA), mid anteroseptal (MAS), and basal anteroseptal (BAS)] along the long axis of the left ventricle and registering how much these segments shorten throughout the cardiac cycle (longitudinal strain). For example, as shown by the yellow curve, at the end of systole the basal inferolateral left ventricular segment has shortened by 15% of its original end-diastolic length. (B) The orientation of the three types of myocardial segmental deformation most commonly reported with strain imaging (longitudinal, radial, and circumferential). GL, global longitudinal. (Reprinted with permission from Petersen et al. [3]).

            Normal Left Ventricular Mechanics

            STE has expanded our understanding of normal LV mechanics and cardiac physiology. The myofibers of the left ventricle have a helical orientation that contributes to efficient contraction. While myofiber orientation is different at subendocardial and subepicardial levels, the subepicardial fiber orientation determines the overall twisting that occurs in the normal human heart. The twisting of the heart was not easily measured with traditional measures of LV function. STE can quantify the twisting of the heart, and both STE and invasive sonomicrometry have demonstrated a counterclockwise rotation of the LV apex and clockwise rotation of the LV base during systole in healthy hearts when viewed from the LV apex [6].

            STE has also expanded our understanding of the timing and magnitude of the shortening of the heart along its long axis, which is called longitudinal strain. After depolarization of the LV subendocardium, there is first longitudinal shortening in the LV apex followed by longitudinal shortening in the LV base that results in a descent of the LV base and mitral annulus toward the LV apex. This longitudinal shortening of the left ventricle, which is not measured with routine echocardiography techniques, is controlled predominately by the function of the subendocardial fibers of the left ventricle [7]. Longitudinal strain, which is now frequently measured with STE, is most commonly reported as global longitudinal strain (GLS), which is a measure of longitudinal contraction of all LV segments. A negative GLS indicates that the left ventricle shortens during systole. Studies of healthy individuals have reported normal GLS in a range from −16 to −22%. In other words, in healthy individuals the left ventricle shortens during systole by 16–22% of its length at the end of diastole. In a meta-analysis the average GLS for healthy individuals was −20% [8]. Longitudinal strain is not uniform around the circumference of the left ventricle and is typically greatest in the inferior and inferolateral LV segments [9].

            This impressive sequence of events in the various regions of the left ventricle contributes to important blood flow patterns within the left ventricle. The coordinated sequence of LV contraction and relaxation leads to a swirling vortex of blood in the left ventricle. This vortical blood flow that occurs during isovolumic, ejection, and relaxation periods is an efficient flow pattern that optimizes blood ejection [10]. Further, the character of the vortical blood flow pattern changes in patients with abnormal myocardial contraction and relaxation [11].

            Abnormal Left Ventricular Mechanics

            STE has shown that various cardiac diseases impact LV mechanics in a similar way. The earliest changes in LV mechanics are similar in myocardial ischemia from obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), pressure overload, and volume overload conditions. All of these conditions appear to first impact longitudinal contraction. STE has the advantage of detecting the abnormal LV longitudinal mechanics that are present in the early stages of these various diseases before abnormalities are seen with standard cardiac ultrasonography.

            Myocardial Ischemia

            Although myocardial ischemia can affect the myocardium in a transmural fashion, the subendocardial myocardial tissue is the most vulnerable to decreases in myocardial perfusion since it is perfused by the most distal part of the coronary circulation [12, 13]. On a macroscopic level, these changes may present as localized wall motion abnormalities seen on standard echocardiography. However, in some instances ischemia may not result in wall motion abnormalities easily seen on standard echocardiographic images. STE can more readily detect subtle changes in myocardial contraction. With the predominant longitudinal orientation of myocardial fibers in the subendocardium, one of the initial functional impacts of ischemia results in a reduction of longitudinal contraction [1418]. Depending on the extent of myocardial ischemia, as demonstrated in animal models, circumferential and radial strain could be maintained or decreased [16, 19]. In some instances, global circumferential strain may actually increase to compensate for the loss in longitudinal contraction [20]. The localization of longitudinal strain to the subendocardial territory is further exemplified by observations that while subendocardial and transmural infarctions both demonstrate reduced longitudinal strain, it is only with transmural injury that reductions in circumferential strain are observed [21, 22].

            Stress Testing

            The ability of STE to measure subtle deficits in contractility caused by myocardial ischemia suggest that it may increase the 78–85% sensitivity to detect obstructive CAD observed with standard stress echocardiography techniques [23, 24]. Longitudinal strain has been shown to be the earliest component of contractility affected by ischemia [15, 16, 18], and thus measurement of regional/segmental longitudinal strain and GLS can help identify myocardial dysfunction caused by ischemia. Although CAD and the resulting ischemia is often more a regional phenomenon, the use of GLS to evaluate patients for evidence of ischemia has been more commonly reported. The reasoning is in part due to the reproducibility of GLS measures on stress echocardiography between readers of differing experience [25], across ultrasound platforms [26], and likely because of ease of use.

            The inclusion of STE in stress echocardiography has shown to increase the sensitivity and specificity of detecting obstructive CAD as compared with wall motion analysis alone (Table 1). Ng et al. [27] demonstrated that STE using GLS cutoffs of 20% LV systolic shortening at peak stress in combination with wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography increased sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant CAD from 76% and 82.1% to 100% and 96.3%, respectively [27]. Similar incremental improvements in diagnosis of CAD were seen in several other studies that included strain analysis [28, 29, 31, 32, 3840]. The success of STE has also been shown to be independent of wall motion analysis in dobutamine stress echocardiography. During dobutamine stress testing of patients with moderate to high risk of CAD, a GLS cutoff of 19% LV systolic shortening at peak stress was found to be 94% sensitive and 92% specific in detection of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions [30]. The use of GLS during stress echocardiography has also demonstrated the capacity to detect changes in myocardial function at lower doses of dobutamine (10 μg/kg/min) than are typically required to detect standard wall motion abnormalities [41]. In patients referred for evaluation of angina or suspected non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, use of STE can also establish those patients likely to have significant CAD on the basis of the resting echocardiogram alone without need for stress testing. In a study by Choi et al. [32], the use of a GLS cutoff of 17.9% LV systolic shortening was able to predict those patients with severe CAD (left main or three-vessel disease) on a resting echocardiogram with normal LV EF (LVEF) and no wall motion abnormalities on standard echocardiography with a sensitivity and specificity of 79%.

            Table 1

            Studies of Longitudinal Strain in Patients with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD).

            ReferenceVariableBaseline populationSoftwareOutcomeStrain (%)
            Optimal cutoff (%)*
            CAD positiveCAD negative
            Ng et al. [27]GLS (DSE)AnginaEchoPACAngiography-confirmed CADRest−19.1±2.8−16.3±2.4
            Peak stress−21.7±3.0−15.7±2.9−20.0
            Hwang et al. [28]GLS (DSE)AnginaEchoPACAngiography-confirmed CADRest−20.1±2.8−19.4±2.2
            Low dose−22.3±2.9−20.3±3.7
            Roushdy et al. [29]GLS (DSE)AnginaQLABAngiography-confirmed CADPeak stress−18.25±3.4−14.9±4.7−16.8
            Rumbinaite et al. [30]GLS (DSE)Intermediate to high probability of CADEchoPACAngiography-confirmed CADRest−21.5±2.4−16.2±2.1−19.5
            Low dose−23.8±2.5−19.2±4.0−21.6
            High dose−22.7±2.4−16.4±2.0−19.0
            Uusitalo et al. [31]GLS (DSE)Intermediate probability of CADEchoPACAngiography-confirmed CADRest−19.0±2.5−18.3±2.5−18.6
            Peak stress−18.9±2.8−17.9±4.0−18.1
            Choi et al. [32]GLS (rest)AnginaEchoPACAngiography-confirmed LM or 3V CADRest−22±1.5−18.0±2.3−19.4
            Nucifora et al. [33]GLS (rest)Stable angina pectorisEchoPACCCTARest−19.5±1.7(<50%) −17.7±1.7
            (>50%) −15.8±1.9
            Tsai et al. [34]GLS (rest)AnginaEchoPACAngiography-confirmed CADRest−20.6±2.8−16.4±4.9−19.0
            Sarvari et al. [35]GLS (rest)Suspected NSTEMIToshibaAngiography-confirmed CADRest−19.2±2.2−15.3±2.2NA
            Gaibazzi et al. [36]GLS (rest)AnginaTomTecAngiography-confirmed CADRest−22.7±2.4−19.0±2.5−20.7
            Rostamzadeh et al. [37]GLS (rest)Recent angiographyXstrainAngiography-confirmed LM or 3V CADRest−17.0±3.0−15.0±2.0−16.0

            A negative strain value indicates left ventricular shortening.

            CCTA, cardiac computed tomography angiography; DSE, dobutamine stress echocardiography; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LM, left main; NA, not available; NSTEMI, non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; 3V, three vessel.

            *Optimal cutoff represents the threshold at which patients were determined to likely have significant CAD (>50% stenosis).

            Unfortunately, use of STE does pose some problems, which can limit its successful implementation. As with other imaging modalities, interpretation is highly reliant on image quality and reproducibility. Additionally, the lack of clear consensus regarding normal values and what definitively represents positive or ischemic strain findings is still not established. Table 1 displays the various software used to assess STE in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease and demonstrates the variable cutoff points for abnormal LV function suggested by numerous studies. As an example, the difference in the change of GLS in patients identified as having significant CAD during stress echocardiography testing from those without could range from 1.0% to more than 5% [2729, 31, 38, 42, 43]. Similarly, the cutoffs of minimum GLS measurements determined to represent significant underlying ischemia at rest are also highly variable, and have been reported from 16.0% to 20.7% LV systolic shortening [28, 3237, 4447].

            Aortic Stenosis and Surgical Timing

            STE has been shown to be an effective tool to identify subtle changes in myocardial function that can occur in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before changes in EF [48]. AS leads to maladaptive LV remodeling that includes subendocardial ischemia and fibrosis [49]. Subendocardial myofiber function dictates LV longitudinal contraction. Therefore with advanced AS it is not surprising that longitudinal strain is impaired. GLS differs significantly depending on the severity of valve stenosis, with values of 17.1%, 16.4%, and 14.5% LV systolic shortening for mild, moderate, or severe stenosis, respectively, despite a maintained LVEF [50]. In addition to GLS, endocardial radial strain is also found to be decreased in proportion to the severity of the disease [51]. Interestingly, although circumferential and epicardial radial strain are often found to be preserved in asymptomatic AS [51], in patients with symptomatic disease, it is the circumferential strain indices that are found to be depressed, in addition to significantly greater observed declines in longitudinal strain [5255]. Of note, in individuals with the variant low-flow low-gradient severe AS, longitudinal strain is found to be even further decreased compared with that in individuals with high-gradient AS (11.6% vs. 14.8% LV shortening), suggesting that progressive longitudinal dysfunction may be a contributing factor to the low-flow AS phenomenon [52]. These observations suggest that in patients with asymptomatic severe AS, decreases in longitudinal strain can identify high-risk candidates for aortic valve replacement (AVR). At present, there is no clear consensus regarding minimum changes or absolute GLS that should warrant earlier intervention for AS treatment. However, it has been shown that in patients with normal or depressed LVEF undergoing transcatheter AVR or surgical AVR, those with impaired GLS had a significantly higher risk of cardiac morbidity and death [5660]. The range of cutoffs observed for GLS that appear to show improved outcome after AVR in normal LVEF patients are broad, and range from 12.1% to 17.8% LV shortening (Table 2) [56, 57, 5965]. At the least, these observations suggest that in patients with severe AS and a declining GLS, early AVR should be considered.

            Following definitive procedural intervention, significant reductions in the transaortic gradient are observed with associated improvements in LV strain patterns. Following either surgical or transcatheter AVR, significant increases in longitudinal strain have been observed, with noted increases in LV systolic shortening on average of 3.2% [54, 58, 6668]. Additionally, studies have shown that increases in circumferential and radial strain also occur following successful procedural intervention [54, 69, 70].

            Table 2

            Studies of Longitudinal Strain in Aortic Stenosis (AS).

            ReferenceVariableBaseline populationSoftwareOutcomeGroupStrain (%)Optimal cutoff (%)
            Lafitte et al. [61]GLSSevere AS, preserved LVEFEchoPACExercise testingAbnormal−14.7±5.1−18.0
            Kusunose et al. [62]GLSModerate and severe AS, preserved LVEFVelocity Vector ImagingReduced survival following AVRModerate-severe AS−15.1±4−12.1
            High-gradient AS−14.1±4
            Low-gradient AS−15.2±4
            Kearney et al. [63]GLSMild to severe AS, preserved LVEFEchoPACDecreased survivalMild AS−21.2±2.4−15.0
            Moderate AS−17.9±2.6
            Severe AS−15.0±3.1
            Lee et al. [59]GLSSevere AS, preserved LVEFEchoPACDeath or HF readmissionEvent group−13.7±3.8−16.5
            No-event group−17.8±2.0
            Sato et al. [60]GLSSevere AS, preserved LVEFEchoPACMACENFHPG AS−17.7±3.3−13.4
            LFHPG AS−17.1±3.9−19.7
            NFLPG AS−19.3±3.4−12.0
            LFLPG AS−19.0±4.2−17.0
            Lancellotti et al. [64]GLSModerate to severe ASEchoPACEvent-free survivalNo events−16.6±2.7−15.9
            Yingchoncharoen et al. [65]GLSSevere ASSyngo Velocity Vector ImagingEvent-free survivalMean GLS−15.2±2.5−15.0
            Dahou et al. [57]GLSSevere AS, depressed LVEFTomTecDecreased survivalAverage rest GLS−9.4±3.0−9.0
            Average stress GLS−9.2±3.0−10.0

            A negative strain value indicates left ventricular shortening.

            AVR, aortic valve replacement; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HF, heart failure; LFHPG, low-flow high-pressure gradient; LFLPG, low-flow low-pressure gradient; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; NFHPG, normal-flow high-pressure gradient; NFLPG, normal-flow low-pressure gradient.

            Ultimately, the ability to predict the optimal timing of AVR before onset of irreversible myocardial remodeling remains the goal; however, because of the lack of clear clinical data and variability in the GLS ranges where patients were shown to have clinical benefit, routine implementation of STE for guiding early AS intervention is not yet defined. However, with further study and greater use of STE in evaluation of AS, establishment of consensus data will be available in the future.

            Mitral Regurgitation and Surgical Timing

            Similarly to AS, surgical intervention for mitral regurgitation (MR) is indicated in the presence of symptoms and in asymptomatic patients who develop LV dysfunction. However, simply “waiting” for LV dysfunction to develop, as defined with standard echocardiographic measures, in an asymptomatic patient is not an appropriate strategy as it is known that increasing LV dysfunction results in worse outcomes after surgery [71]. Owing to favorable loading conditions from decreased afterload and increased preload, LVEF usually remains elevated during the early course of severe MR. But chronic volume overload, increased wall stress, and resultant remodeling lead to myocardial dysfunction and eventually a drop in EF [72]. As certain components of myocardial function become impaired before the development of this drop in EF, the use of STE has been studied as a possible modality for the detection of this early myocardial dysfunction. For example, Kim et al. [73] showed that reduction in longitudinal strain rate occurs earlier than reductions in circumferential and radial strain in patients with severe MR and precedes a drop in more traditional measures of LV function (such as LVEF and dP/dt).

            Surgical timing in patients with asymptomatic severe MR remains controversial. STE may provide insight into which asymptomatic patients will be at higher risk of developing heart failure and other related adverse cardiac events. In a cohort of patients with severe MR and normal LVEF, patients who required mitral valve surgery during the follow-up period had a lower GLS as compared with those who did not require surgery (19% vs. 21%) [74]. Additionally, the increase in GLS during bicycle exercise testing was lower in those patients who required surgery as compared with those who did not (1.7% vs. 3.4%). Changes in GLS during exercise testing were predictive of changes in LVEF at follow-up. Magne et al. [75] also studied patients with asymptomatic severe primary MR with normal LVEF by performing exercise stress echocardiography, and found that the inability to increase GLS by 2% or more with exercise was superior to LVEF in predicting adverse cardiac events. LV strain evaluated with 3D techniques has also been shown to predict clinical outcomes in patients with severe MR [76]. In asymptomatic patients with severe MR and normal LVEF, 3D GLS was lower in patients with subsequent clinical events as compared with those with no events (15.8% vs. 17.9%), with an optimal cutoff point suggested at 14.3% by receiver operating curve analysis. Interestingly, a novel measure of subendocardial function called area strain, which integrates longitudinal and circumferential strain using 3D data, provided the best prediction of event-free survival in multivariate Cox regression.

            STE may also be able to predict which patients will have worse outcomes postoperatively. Numerous studies have shown that impaired GLS predicts worsening LVEF after surgery, with cutoffs ranging from 18% to 20.5% LV systolic shortening (Table 3) [74, 7679]. De Isla et al. [80] showed that longitudinal strain rate at the level of the midventricular septum (<−0.80/s) was the best predictor of a drop in LVEF of more than 10% postoperatively. Alashi et al. [77] found that both GLS and brain natriuretic peptide level when combined with traditional risk factors, such as Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, improved prognostic information regarding postoperative mortality. A preoperative GLS below 20.7% LV systolic shortening in the setting of an elevated brain natriuretic peptide level was predictive of postoperative death. These studies emphasize the importance of incorporating STE measures of longitudinal strain in the decision of surgical timing, and suggest that earlier intervention in patients with asymptomatic severe MR and borderline abnormalities in GLS should be considered.

            Table 3

            Studies of Myocardial Strain in Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation (MR).

            ReferenceVariableBaseline populationSoftwareOutcomeStrain (%)*Optimal cutoff (%)
            Lancellotti et al. [74]Exercise GLSSevere MR undergoing surgeryEchoPACPostoperative LV systolic dysfunction23.4±4.7 (Postoperative LVEF ≥50%)
            17.1±4.4 (Postoperative LVEF <50%)
            Change in GLS with exercise (contractile reserve)Severe MR undergoing surgeryPostoperative LV systolic dysfunction3.6±3.9 (Post operative LVEF ≥50%)
            −0.8±3.9 (Postoperative LVEF <50%)
            Casas-Rojo et al. [76]3D GLSAsymptomatic severe MRToshibaClinical event (new onset dyspnea, CHF admission, MV surgery, LVEF <60%)−17.9±3 (No-event group)
            −15.8±2.1 (Event group)
            Alashi et al. [77]GLSSevere MR undergoing surgeryVelocity Vector Imaging (Siemens)Death−20.7
            Witkowski et al. [78]GLSSevere MR undergoing surgeryEchoPACPostoperative LV systolic dysfunction−22.4 (Postoperative LVEF ≥50%)
            −18.6 (Postoperative LVEF <50%)
            Donal et al. [79]Exercise GLSSevere MR undergoing surgeryEchoPACPostoperative LV systolic dysfunction−20±3 (Postoperative LVEF ≥50%)
            −17±2 (Postoperative LVEF <50%)

            A negative strain value indicates left ventricular (LV) shortening.

            CHF congestive heart failure; GLS, global longitudinal strain; MV, mitral valve, LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

            *Values are baseline values and for patients undergoing MV surgery represent preoperative measures.

            Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve is an evolving intervention for the treatment of MR. Multiple studies have been performed using speckle tracking to follow the response of the left ventricle to this intervention. In patients with severe primary MR who receive the mitral valve clip, GLS is initially reduced in the immediate postprocedure setting [81]. Similar reductions were shown in prior studies immediately after operative repair before eventual improvement and have been attributed to immediate changes in loading conditions [82, 83]. Multiple authors have shown significant improvements in GLS after mitral valve clip intervention anywhere from 1 month to 6 months after the procedure [8486].

            Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony

            Dyssynchrony is typically defined as a difference in the time to peak contraction between different LV segments [87]. LV dyssynchrony is a significant risk factor for adverse cardiac outcomes [88]. To address this phenomenon, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been used as mainstay treatment with success rates of up to 67% when devices are implanted per standard guidelines [89]. This modest degree of CRT efficacy prompted further investigation into the relationship between LV mechanics and CRT outcomes.

            STE can define the timing of contraction of all of the LV segments. Dyssynchrony has been measured by comparison of the time to peak of radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strain between LV segments. Dyssynchrony is most commonly measured with radial strain. Studies of radial strain have provided encouraging evidence of its role in identifying likely responders to CRT and in guiding optimal lead placement [90, 91]. Consideration of longitudinal strain appears to also aid in the evaluation of patients with dyssynchrony. Longitudinal dyssynchrony as assessed by the time to peak velocity of two sites with tissue Doppler imaging (≥60 ms) and radial dyssynchrony evaluated by speckle tracking (two sites ≥130 ms) were compared for predictive value [92]. When either longitudinal or radial dyssynchrony was present, there was a 15% or greater increase in EF in 59% of the patients. Conversely, if both longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony were present at the baseline, then there was a 95% response to CRT versus a 10% response if neither was present.

            In addition to documenting dyssynchrony that is likely to respond to CRT, longitudinal strain may also help identify those patients with more advanced cardiomyopathy who might not benefit from CRT. D’Andrea et al. [93] studied 45 consecutive patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and an upcoming CRT procedure. GLS of 12% or less correlated with 84.7% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity in predicting no response to CRT.

            In summary, although further investigation is warranted to optimally determine which patients will have the most favorable outcomes, at this time the body of literature suggests that patients with longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony detected on STE incur significant benefit with CRT. Further, longitudinal strain may provide an important predictor of benefit in patients with more advanced cardiomyopathies.

            Conclusions and Future Directions

            Standard measures of LV systolic function, such as EF, fail to identify LV dysfunction and guide management in various cardiac diseases. STE software can track the motion of the myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle and quantify the shortening of the myocardium along the long axis of the left ventricle during systole. Impairment of longitudinal systolic shortening of the left ventricle appears to be an early mechanical deficit in multiple cardiac diseases and is not measured with standard echocardiographic analysis. The level of impairment in longitudinal strain that indicates the need for change in patient management has been variable across studies and different software programs, and thus ongoing evaluation of the optimal cutoff point of GLS in guiding therapy for various conditions is required. The available studies have suggested that a GLS below 16–20% LV systolic shortening at peak stress improves our identification of angiography-confirmed obstructive CAD. The optimal GLS cutoff that predicts preoperative events in patients with asymptomatic severe AS has had a significant range across studies, but many have suggested that a GLS below 15% LV systolic shortening is predictive of poor outcome. Further, a GLS below approximately 15–18% LV systolic shortening predicts preoperative events and postoperative LV systolic dysfunction in patients with asymptomatic severe MR.

            Efforts at ensuring that standardized measures of GLS and other parameters of strain are reliably available across various echocardiographic systems are necessary. Additional studies confirming that use of standardized measures of GLS can appropriately guide the timing of valvular intervention are required. In addition to GLS, more advanced measures of LV function may enhance our evaluation of cardiac function, and preliminary study encourages ongoing investigation. For example, STE can not only determine GLS for the entire left ventricle but can also quantify longitudinal contraction in the subendocardial and subepicardial layers of the myocardium. Initial studies suggest that impairment of longitudinal contraction in the subendocardial layer has the best correlation with AS severity and may therefore provide the best measure to determine optimal surgical timing [94]. Consideration of loading conditions when one is interpreting STE-determined measures of strain may also be important as this may better approximate the power of the ventricle. Longitudinal strain adjusted for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure has been shown to be a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events in patients without known cardiovascular disease [95]. Further study could help determine if longitudinal strain adjusted for blood pressure could better predict outcomes in patients with CAD or valvular heart disease.

            Conflict of Interest

            The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


            1. BhatiaRS, TuJV, LeeDS, AustinPC, FangJ, HaouziA, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med 2006;355:260–9.

            2. PerssonH, LonnE, EdnerM, BaruchL, LangCC, MortonJJ, et al. Diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved systolic function: need for objective evidence: results from the CHARM Echocardiographic Substudy-CHARMES. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:687–94.

            3. PetersenJW, ForderJR, ThomasJD, MoyeLA, LawsonM, LoghinC, et al. Quantification of myocardial segmental function in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease and implications for cardiovascular cell therapy trials: a review from the NHLBI-Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:671–9.

            4. CastelAL, SzymanskiC, DelelisF, LevyF, MenetA, MaillietA, et al. Prospective comparison of speckle tracking longitudinal bidimensional strain between two vendors. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2014;107:96–104.

            5. NagataY, TakeuchiM, MizukoshiK, WuVC, LinFC, NegishiK, et al. Intervendor variability of two-dimensional strain using vendor-specific and vendor-independent software. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:630–41.

            6. SenguptaPP, KrishnamoorthyVK, KorinekJ, NarulaJ, VannanMA, LesterSJ, et al. Left ventricular form and function revisited: applied translational science to cardiovascular ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:539–51.

            7. GeyerH, CaraccioloG, AbeH, WilanskyS, CarerjS, GentileF, et al. Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:351–69; quiz 453–5.

            8. YingchoncharoenT, AgarwalS, PopovicZB, MarwickTH. Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:185–91.

            9. BogaertJ, RademakersFE. Regional nonuniformity of normal adult human left ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001;280:H610–20.

            10. SenguptaPP, KhandheriaBK, KorinekJ, JahangirA, YoshifukuS, MilosevicI, et al. Left ventricular isovolumic flow sequence during sinus and paced rhythms: new insights from use of high-resolution Doppler and ultrasonic digital particle imaging velocimetry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:899–908.

            11. HongGR, PedrizzettiG, TontiG, LiP, WeiZ, KimJK, et al. Characterization and quantification of vortex flow in the human left ventricle by contrast echocardiography using vector particle image velocimetry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:705–17.

            12. AlgranatiD, KassabGS, LanirY. Why is the subendocardium more vulnerable to ischemia? A new paradigm. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011;300:H1090–100.

            13. HoffmanJI, BuckbergGD. Pathophysiology of subendocardial ischaemia. Br Med J 1975;1:76–9.

            14. BansalM, SenguptaPP. Longitudinal and circumferential strain in patients with regional LV dysfunction. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013;15:339.

            15. BorkeWB, EdvardsenT, FugelsethD, LenesK, IhlenH, SaugstadOD, et al. Reduced left ventricular function in hypoxemic newborn pigs: a strain Doppler echocardiographic study. Pediatr Res 2006;59:630–5.

            16. ReantP, LabrousseL, LafitteS, BordacharP, PilloisX, TariosseL, et al. Experimental validation of circumferential, longitudinal, and radial 2-dimensional strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography in ischemic conditions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:149–57.

            17. SenguptaPP, KorinekJ, BelohlavekM, NarulaJ, VannanMA, JahangirA, et al. Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1988–2001.

            18. UrheimS, EdvardsenT, TorpH, AngelsenB, SmisethOA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 2000;102:1158–64.

            19. MooreCC, McVeighER, ZerhouniEA. Noninvasive measurement of three-dimensional myocardial deformation with tagged magnetic resonance imaging during graded local ischemia. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999;1:207–22.

            20. D’EliaN, D’HoogeJ, MarwickTH. Association between myocardial mechanics and ischemic LV remodeling. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1430–43.

            21. ChanJ, HanekomL, WongC, LeanoR, ChoGY, MarwickTH. Differentiation of subendocardial and transmural infarction using two-dimensional strain rate imaging to assess short-axis and long-axis myocardial function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2026–33.

            22. SjoliB, OrnS, GrenneB, IhlenH, EdvardsenT, BrunvandH. Diagnostic capability and reproducibility of strain by Doppler and by speckle tracking in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:24–33.

            23. BeleslinBD, OstojicM, Djordjevic-DikicA, BabicR, NedeljkovicM, StankovicG, et al. Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:717–26.

            24. MarwickTH. Stress echocardiography. Heart 2003;89:113–8.

            25. YamadaA, LuisSA, SathianathanD, KhandheriaBK, CafaroJ, Hamilton-CraigCR, et al. Reproducibility of regional and global longitudinal strains derived from two-dimensional speckle-tracking and Doppler tissue imaging between expert and novice readers during quantitative dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:880–7.

            26. PatrianakosAP, ZacharakiAA, KalogerakisA, SolidakisG, ParthenakisFI, VardasPE. Two-dimensional global and segmental longitudinal strain: are the results from software in different high-end ultrasound systems comparable? Echo Res Pract 2015;2:29–39.

            27. NgAC, SitgesM, PhamPN, Tran daT, DelgadoV, BertiniM, et al. Incremental value of 2-dimensional speckle tracking strain imaging to wall motion analysis for detection of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am Heart J 2009;158:836–44.

            28. HwangHJ, LeeHM, YangIH, LeeJL, PakHY, ParkCB, et al. The value of assessing myocardial deformation at recovery after dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014;22:127–33.

            29. RoushdyA, Abou El SeoudY, Abd ElrahmanM, WadeaaB, EletribyA, Abd El SalamZ. The additional utility of two-dimensional strain in detection of coronary artery disease presence and localization in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiogram. Echocardiography 2017;34:1010–9.

            30. RumbinaiteE, Zaliaduonyte-PeksieneD, LapinskasT, ZvirblyteR, KaruzasA, JonauskieneI, et al. Early and late diastolic strain rate vs. global longitudinal strain at rest and during dobutamine stress for the assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with a moderate and high probability of coronary artery disease. Echocardiography 2016;33:1512–22.

            31. UusitaloV, LuotolahtiM, PietilaM, Wendelin-SaarenhoviM, HartialaJ, SarasteM, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking during dobutamine stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29:470–9.e3.

            32. ChoiJO, ChoSW, SongYB, ChoSJ, SongBG, LeeSC, et al. Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:695–701.

            33. NuciforaG, SchuijfJD, DelgadoV, BertiniM, ScholteAJ, NgAC, et al. Incremental value of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction for the identification of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2010;159:148–57.

            34. TsaiWC, LiuYW, HuangYY, LinCC, LeeCH, TsaiLM. Diagnostic value of segmental longitudinal strain by automated function imaging in coronary artery disease without left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:1183–9.

            35. SarvariSI, HaugaaKH, ZahidW, BendzB, AakhusS, AabergeL, et al. Layer-specific quantification of myocardial deformation by strain echocardiography may reveal significant CAD in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:535–44.

            36. GaibazziN, PigazzaniF, ReverberiC, PorterTR. Rest global longitudinal 2D strain to detect coronary artery disease in patients undergoing stress echocardiography: a comparison with wall-motion and coronary flow reserve responses. Echo Res Pract 2014;1:61–70.

            37. RostamzadehA, ShojaeifardM, RezaeiY, DehghanK. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial deformation indices for detecting high risk coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:9412–20.

            38. Bjork IngulC, RozisE, SlordahlSA, MarwickTH. Incremental value of strain rate imaging to wall motion analysis for prediction of outcome in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 2007;115:1252–9.

            39. Cusma-PiccioneM, ZitoC, OretoL, D’AngeloM, TripepiS, Di BellaG, et al. Longitudinal strain by automated function imaging detects single-vessel coronary artery disease in patients undergoing dipyridamole stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1214–21.

            40. ReantP, LabrousseL, LafitteS, TariosseL, Bonoron-AdeleS, PadoisP, et al. Quantitative analysis of function and perfusion during dobutamine stress in the detection of coronary stenoses: two-dimensional strain and contrast echocardiography investigations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:95–103.

            41. YuY, VillarragaHR, SalehHK, ChaSS, PellikkaPA. Can ischemia and dyssynchrony be detected during early stages of dobutamine stress echocardiography by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29: 95–102.

            42. AggeliC, LagoudakouS, FelekosI, PanagopoulouV, KastellanosS, ToutouzasK, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015;13:43.

            43. RumbinaiteE, Zaliaduonyte-PeksieneD, ViezelisM, CeponieneI, LapinskasT, ZvirblyteR, et al. Dobutamine-stress echocardiography speckle-tracking imaging in the assessment of hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients with moderate and high probability of coronary artery disease. Medicina (Kaunas) 2016;52:331–9.

            44. Biering-SorensenT, HoffmannS, MogelvangR, Zeeberg IversenA, GalatiusS, Fritz-HansenT, et al. Myocardial strain analysis by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography improves diagnostics of coronary artery stenosis in stable angina pectoris. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:58–65.

            45. DahlslettT, KarlsenS, GrenneB, EekC, SjoliB, SkulstadH, et al. Early assessment of strain echocardiography can accurately exclude significant coronary artery stenosis in suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:512–9.

            46. MontgomeryDE, PuthumanaJJ, FoxJM, OgunyankinKO. Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:579–87.

            47. SmedsrudMK, SarvariS, HaugaaKH, GjesdalO, OrnS, AabergeL, et al. Duration of myocardial early systolic lengthening predicts the presence of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:1086–93.

            48. WeidemannF, JamalF, KowalskiM, KukulskiT, D’HoogeJ, BijnensB, et al. Can strain rate and strain quantify changes in regional systolic function during dobutamine infusion, B-blockade, and atrial pacing–implications for quantitative stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:416–24.

            49. ElmariahS. Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2015;17:391.

            50. MiyazakiS, DaimonM, MiyazakiT, OnishiY, KoisoY, NishizakiY, et al. Global longitudinal strain in relation to the severity of aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Echocardiography 2011;28:703–8.

            51. OharaY, FukuokaY, TabuchiI, SaharaS, HosogiS, NishimotoM, et al. The impairment of endocardial radial strain is related to aortic stenosis severity in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography 2012;29:1172–80.

            52. AddaJ, MielotC, GiorgiR, CransacF, ZirphileX, DonalE, et al. Low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal ejection fraction is associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction as assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: a multicenter study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:27–35.

            53. CarassoS, MutlakD, LessickJ, ReisnerSA, RakowskiH, AgmonY. Symptoms in severe aortic stenosis are associated with decreased compensatory circumferential myocardial mechanics. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:218–25.

            54. DelgadoV, TopsLF, van BommelRJ, van der KleyF, MarsanNA, KlautzRJ, et al. Strain analysis in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing surgical valve replacement. Eur Heart J 2009;30:3037–47.

            55. LuszczakJ, OlszowskaM, DrapiszS, PlazakW, KarchI, KomarM, et al. Assessment of left ventricle function in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging. Med Sci Monit 2012;18:MT91–6.

            56. DahlJS, VidebaekL, PoulsenMK, RudbaekTR, PellikkaPA, MollerJE. Global strain in severe aortic valve stenosis: relation to clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:613–20.

            57. DahouA, BartkoPE, CapouladeR, ClavelMA, MundiglerG, GrondinSL, et al. Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:e002117.

            58. KafaR, KusunoseK, GoodmanAL, SvenssonLG, SabikJF, GriffinBP, et al. Association of abnormal postoperative left ventricular global longitudinal strain with outcomes in severe aortic stenosis following aortic valve replacement. JAMA Cardiol 2016;1:494–6.

            59. LeeHF, HsuLA, ChanYH, WangCL, ChangCJ, KuoCT. Prognostic value of global left ventricular strain for conservatively treated patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. J Cardiol 2013;62:301–6.

            60. SatoK, SeoY, IshizuT, TakeuchiM, IzumoM, SuzukiK, et al. Prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Circ J 2014;78:2750–9.

            61. LafitteS, PerlantM, ReantP, SerriK, DouardH, DeMariaA, et al. Impact of impaired myocardial deformations on exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:414–9.

            62. KusunoseK, GoodmanA, ParikhR, BarrT, AgarwalS, PopovicZB, et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:938–45.

            63. KearneyLG, LuK, OrdM, PatelSK, ProfitisK, MatalanisG, et al. Global longitudinal strain is a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:827–33.

            64. LancellottiP, DonalE, MagneJ, O’ConnorK, MoonenML, CosynsB, et al. Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:537–43.

            65. YingchoncharoenT, GibbyC, RodriguezLL, GrimmRA, MarwickTH. Association of myocardial deformation with outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis with normal ejection fraction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:719–25.

            66. D’AscenziF, CameliM, IadanzaA, LisiM, ZacaV, RecciaR, et al. Improvement of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a speckle-tracking prospective study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1007–15.

            67. PoulsenSH, SogaardP, Nielsen-KudskJE, EgebladH. Recovery of left ventricular systolic longitudinal strain after valve replacement in aortic stenosis and relation to natriuretic peptides. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:877–84.

            68. SchattkeS, BaldenhoferG, PraukaI, ZhangK, LauleM, StanglV, et al. Acute regional improvement of myocardial function after interventional transfemoral aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2012;10:15.

            69. ChenY, ZhangZ, ChengL, FanL, WangC, ShuX. The early variation of left ventricular strain after aortic valve replacement by three-dimensional echocardiography. PLoS One 2015;10:e0140469.

            70. RostC, KorderS, WasmeierG, WuM, KlinghammerL, FlachskampfFA, et al. Sequential changes in myocardial function after valve replacement for aortic stenosis by speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:584–9.

            71. NishimuraRA, OttoCM, BonowRO, CarabelloBA, Erwin JP3rd, GuytonRA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:e1–132.

            72. GrossmanW, JonesD, McLaurinLP. Wall stress and patterns of hypertrophy in the human left ventricle. J Clin Invest 1975;56:56–64.

            73. KimMS, KimYJ, KimHK, HanJY, ChunHG, KimHC, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular short- and long-axis function in severe mitral regurgitation using 2-dimensional strain echocardiography. Am Heart J 2009;157:345–51.

            74. LancellottiP, CosynsB, ZacharakisD, AttenaE, Van CampG, GachO, et al. Importance of left ventricular longitudinal function and functional reserve in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation: assessment by two-dimensional speckle tracking. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21:1331–6.

            75. MagneJ, MahjoubH, DulgheruR, PibarotP, PierardLA, LancellottiP. Left ventricular contractile reserve in asymptomatic primary mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1608–16.

            76. Casas-RojoE, Fernandez-GolfinC, Moya-MurJL, Gonzalez-GomezA, Garcia-MartinA, Moran-FernandezL, et al. Area strain from 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography as an independent predictor of early symptoms or ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;32:1189–98.

            77. AlashiA, MentiasA, PatelK, GillinovAM, SabikJF, PopovicZB, et al. Synergistic utility of brain natriuretic peptide and left ventricular global longitudinal strain in asymptomatic patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation and preserved systolic function undergoing mitral valve surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:e004451.

            78. WitkowskiTG, ThomasJD, DebonnairePJ, DelgadoV, HokeU, EweSH, et al. Global longitudinal strain predicts left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:69–76.

            79. DonalE, MascleS, BrunetA, ThebaultC, CorbineauH, LaurentM, et al. Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction 6 months after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: the value of exercise echocardiography and deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:922–30.

            80. de IslaLP, de AgustinA, RodrigoJL, AlmeriaC, del Carmen ManzanoM, RodriguezE, et al. Chronic mitral regurgitation: a pilot study to assess preoperative left ventricular contractile function using speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:831–8.

            81. LavallD, ReilJC, Segura SchmitzL, MehrerM, SchirmerSH, BohmM, et al. Early hemodynamic improvement after percutaneous mitral valve repair evaluated by noninvasive pressure-volume analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29:888–98.

            82. ChoEJ, ParkSJ, YunHR, JeongDS, LeeSC, ParkSW, et al. Predicting left ventricular dysfunction after surgery in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation: assessment of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional multilayer speckle tracking echocardiography. Korean Circ J 2016;46:213–21.

            83. WitkowskiTG, ThomasJD, DelgadoV, van RijnsoeverE, NgAC, HokeU, et al. Changes in left ventricular function after mitral valve repair for severe organic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:754–60.

            84. ScanduraS, DipasquaF, GargiuloG, CapodannoD, CaggegiA, GrassoC, et al. Early results of MitraClip system implantation by real-time three-dimensional speckle-tracking left ventricle analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2016;17:843–9.

            85. VitarelliA, MangieriE, CapotostoL, TanzilliG, D’AngeliI, ViceconteN, et al. Assessment of biventricular function by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in secondary mitral regurgitation after repair with the MitraClip system. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1070–82.

            86. ZuernCS, KrummP, WursterT, KramerU, SchreieckJ, HenningA, et al. Reverse left ventricular remodeling after percutaneous mitral valve repair: strain analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:4983–5.

            87. YuCM, ZhangQ. Assessment of LV systolic dyssynchrony in heart failure beyond a snapshot. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:457–9.

            88. ElkilanyGE, Al-QbandiMA, SayedKA, KabbashI. Dilated cardiomyopathy in children and adults: what is new? ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:762–75.

            89. HaraH, OyenugaOA, TanakaH, AdelsteinEC, OnishiT, McNamaraDM, et al. The relationship of QRS morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony to long-term outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2680–91.

            90. DelgadoV, YpenburgC, van BommelRJ, TopsLF, MollemaSA, MarsanNA, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1944–52.

            91. YpenburgC, van BommelRJ, DelgadoV, MollemaSA, BleekerGB, BoersmaE, et al. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1402–9.

            92. Gorcsan J3rd, TanabeM, BleekerGB, SuffolettoMS, ThomasNC, SabaS, et al. Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1476–83.

            93. D‘AndreaA, CasoP, ScarafileR, RieglerL, SalernoG, CastaldoF, et al. Effects of global longitudinal strain and total scar burden on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:58–67.

            94. FungMJ, LeungDY, ThomasL. Differential myocardial fibre involvement by strain analysis in patients with aortic stenosis. Heart Lung Circ 2017. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.017. In press.

            95. RheaIB, RehmanS, JaroriU, ChoudhryMW, FeigenbaumH, SawadaSG. Prognostic utility of blood pressure-adjusted global and basal systolic longitudinal strain. Echo Res Pract 2016;3:17–24.

            Author and article information

            Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
            Compuscript (Ireland )
            July 2018
            August 2018
            : 3
            : 2
            : 237-250
            [1] 1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
            Author notes
            Correspondence: John W. Petersen, MD, MS, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida Health Science Center, 1600 SW Archer Rd, PO Box 100277, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA, Tel.: +1-352-2945150, Fax: +1-352-8460314, E-mail: john.petersen@ 123456medicine.ufl.edu
            Copyright © 2018 Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

            : 17 November 2017
            : 8 January 2018
            : 9 January 2018

            General medicine,Medicine,Geriatric medicine,Transplantation,Cardiovascular Medicine,Anesthesiology & Pain management
            echocardiographic imaging,longitudinal strain,ischemic heart disease,valvular heart disease,speckle tracking echocardiography


            Comment on this article