Introduction and background
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become an unprecedented global crisis, resulting in 48,534,508 confirmed cases and 1,231,017 deaths by 7 November 2020 as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO). Most humans are generally susceptible to infection while the elderly or those with pre-existing conditions (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers) are more vulnerable to severe COVID-19 [1]. Patients infected with COVID-19 may develop multiple organ failure suggesting that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) not only causes damage to the lungs, but also to the heart, kidney, gastrointestinal duct, kidneys, etc. [2–5]. In addition to the burden placed on healthcare systems, COVID-19 imposes an immense threat to social welfare and the global economy [6]. In our review, we first introduce the background on COVID-19, especially the molecular mechanisms of its hazardous nature. More importantly, we discuss the current and evolving evidence on the interplay between COVID-19 and metabolic syndrome and repurposing metabolic drugs for COVID-19 treatment.
The molecular characteristics of COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2 is a beta coronavirus (CoV) containing a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA [7]. SARS-CoV-2 was found to share several similarities with MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, especially the latter, as they all belong to the same highly pathogenic CoV family. Moreover, SimPlot and phylogenetic analysis has shown that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 shares 96.2% identity to that of bat CoV RaTG13 [8], 79% to SARS-CoV, and 50% to MERS-CoV, indicating a bat origin [9]. At the molecular level, SARS-CoV-2 uses the same entry receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with SARS-CoV [10]. However, the notable exception was the crucial virus surface protein, a spike protein. The binding affinity of ACE2 with SARS-CoV-2 was 10–20 times higher than SARS-CoV [11], which is possibly due to an additional S1/S2 cleavage site of the spike protein and may explain the higher transmission efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 [12]. Another difference is the distinct cytokine profiles they induced. In patients with COVID-19, besides T helper 2 cytokines, T helper 1 cytokines were also elevated [13].
The SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes four structural, 16 nonstructural, and a variety of accessory proteins. Four key structural proteins are the spike protein, membrane protein, envelop protein and the nucleocapsid protein, all with different functions. The trimeric spike protein forms a unique spike structure on the virus surface and mediates receptor binding and fusion to the cell. Therefore, antibodies mainly target the spike protein [12]. The membrane protein, the main protease of SARS-CoV-2, plays a vital role in RNA translation and thus in viral replication. The envelop protein plays an essential part in viral assembly and release. Besides, the ion channel activity of envelop protein is potentially needed for the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 [10]. The nucleocapsid protein forms a ribonucleoprotein core with a viral genome and has attracted attention because of its diverse functions in different stages of viral infection including transcription, translation, etc. [14]. Furthermore, the nucleocapsid protein could act as a viral suppressor of RNA interference and possibly contribute to immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 [15]. Three important nonstructural proteins, nsp3, nsp5, and nsp12 (more often named RdRp) are requisites for viral production [16]. More importantly, RdRp was the target of the promising therapeutic candidate, remdesivir [17].
ACE2 is known to be a functional receptor for SARS-CoV [18]. The expression of ACE2, a type I membrane glycoprotein, has been found in various organs including the lung, heart, kidney, testis, intestinal tract, liver, brain, and pancreas [19–21]. ACE2 was experimentally confirmed to be the cell entry receptor of SARS-CoV-2 using virus infectivity studies, in which SARS-CoV-2 was able to enter HeLa cells expressing ACE2 from humans, Chinese horseshoe bats, civets, and pigs, but not those without ACE2 [8]. The hypothesis was also supported by some structural evidence. The Cryo-EM structure indicated that the ACE2 homodimer can bind to two SARS-CoV-2 S proteins simultaneously [22]. In detail, in the case of SARS-CoV, once the SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit is bound to the ACE2 N-terminal peptidase domain of the host cell, the S1 subunit dissociates while the metastable pre-fusion S2 subunit transforms to a profoundly stable post-fusion conformation. For receptor occupancy, the epitopes for receptor recognition are instantly hidden or exposed, mediated by the hinge-like conformational transition of the receptor-binding domain of S1. The S protein is cleaved at the S1/S2 and at the S2′ sites to form S1 and S2 by the host-cell protease, which is another prerequisite for SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowing viral membrane fusion. A recent study investigated TMPRSS2 and CatB/L, two alternative proteases hijacked by SARS-CoV. It suggested that SARS-CoV-2 might use TMPRSS2 but not CatB/L as a crucial protease, partly supported by the results that camostat mesylate, a TMPRSS2 inhibitor, significantly blocked SARS-CoV-2 entry while directed expression of TMPRSS2 rescued virus entry from the inhibition of CatB/L [23].
The detrimental effects and molecular mechanisms of COVID-19
The most common onset symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, dry cough, and fatigue, while less common symptoms involve the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. Some patients may progress to dyspnea, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and even death [3]. The lungs are the primary targets of SARS-CoV-2, and the typical abnormalities of computed tomography (CT) scans are bilateral patchy shadows and ground-glass opacity. The laboratory results are characterized by lymphocytopenia, elevated D-dimer, inflammatory factors, and other related markers suggesting the existence of multiple organ damage [24].
Here, we will discuss the putative mechanisms of how SARS-CoV-2 harms cells, especially the lungs. Furthermore, it may provide inspiration about how COVID-19 potentially exacerbates metabolic diseases.
Attacking host cells via ACE2 binding and entry
One potential mechanism is that SARS-CoV-2 directly uses the ACE2 receptor expressed by pneumocytes for entry to induce lung injury. Histopathologic examination of lung biopsies of COVID-19 patients shows diffuse alveolar damage, reactive type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, and intra-alveolar fibrinous exudates. Furthermore, rich expression of Rp3 nucleoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 has been found in alveolar epithelial cells [25].
A human ACE2 knock-in mouse model was generated to further study the pathogenesis of COVID-19, and high viral loads were detected in lung, trachea, and brain after intranasal infection with SARS-CoV-2 compared with no viral RNAs detected in wild-type mice [26]. Based on this hypothesis, expression of ACE2 on extrapulmonary organs may indicate potential infection and patterns of injury [27]. The expression levels of ACE2 across 31 healthy human tissues was investigated and the results showed ACE2 was expressed highest in the small intestine, testis, kidney, heart, and thyroid glands, and lowest in the blood, spleen, bone marrow, brain, and muscle. Intriguingly, ACE2 was only expressed at a medium level in the lungs, colon, liver, bladder, and adrenal glands [28]. Clinical, pathological, and experimental evidence of damage in extrapulmonary tissue is consistent with the expression of ACE2 in the kidneys [29, 30], liver [31–33], brain [34], blood vessels [27, 30, 35], etc.
Liver injury is discussed in detail as an example. Elevated markers of liver cell injury in COVID-19 patients [36], microvesicular steatosis, decreased lobular activity, and SARS-CoV-2 RNAs found in liver biopsies implied the possible direct infection of the liver [33]. To explore the role of ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2-induced liver damage ex vivo, human liver ductal organoids that preserved human ACE2+ cholangiocytes were established and the results showed that SARS-CoV-2 could infect and replicate abundantly in these special organoids. Furthermore, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) analysis revealed dysregulation of genes related to a tight junction (claudin 1) formation and impaired bile acid transportation caused by virus infection, which may explain the bile acid accumulation and consequent liver injury in COVID-19 [31].
In addition, a positive association between the amount of viral load and disease severity highlighted the potential importance of direct viral toxicity in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 infection [37]. Notably, emerging evidence has demonstrated that complications in metabolic-related organs were potentially caused by SARS-CoV-2. It implies the link between COVID-19 and metabolism. The liver, the main metabolic organ in the body, showed hepatic congestion, mild steatosis, portal fibrosis, lobular cholestasis, and massive necrosis [38]. The small intestine, the primary site of nutrition absorption, was also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 [39]. Pancreatic injury in COVID-19 patients included increased plasma levels of amylase and lipase, dilated pancreatic ducts [40], and focal pancreatitis [41]. Alterations in glucose, lipid [42], and protein metabolism indicated that SARS-CoV-2 may hijack the host metabolism to fuel its rapid infection and replication [43]. Proteinuria, hematuria, acute kidney injury (AKI) [44], and even kidney failure [45] have been observed. The endothelium is not only the lining of the blood vessels but also an endocrine organ, and the endothelialitis seen in various organs may be attributed to direct viral infection and host inflammatory response [27]. The new-onset myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection implies the involvement of the heart, especially the myocardium, in the clinical course of COVID-19 [46].
The inflammatory factor storm
A cytokine storm, an auto-amplifying cytokine overproduction, is correlated with disease severity and has attracted growing concerns about its role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Several studies found that most severe patients tended to have elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-2, IL-2R, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP1α), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and the subsequent cytokine storm [3, 47, 48]. Transcriptome sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of COVID-19 patients drew similar conclusions [49].
A potential mechanism through which SARS-CoV-2 triggered a cytokine storm is summarized as below [50]. SARS-CoV-2 caused apoptosis or necrosis of infected cells, followed by positive feedback between the recruitment of inflammatory cells and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines or chemokines. The immune system dysregulation manifested a specific pattern. An increased number and activation [51] of macrophages were seen in severe COVID-19 patients and may be the main cytokine producers involved in the pathogenesis of the cytokine storm [52]. The apoptosis of lymphocytes, especially CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, induced by SARS-CoV-2 leads to lymphocytopenia, which further reduces viral clearance and relieves the inhibition of T cells on overreactive innate immune systems [53]. In addition, the number of anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells declines [47]. Based on serum proteomic and metabolomic profiling, it was suggested that in addition to the imbalance of immune cells, impaired platelet degranulation, complement activation, and substantial metabolic decline possibly further exacerbates the cytokine storm and the progression of COVID-19 [54]. It is still an under-investigated phenomenon as to whether cytokines may induce the release of glucocorticoids and other peptides by modulating the neuroendocrine system [55].
ARDS has been the leading cause of death in patients with COVID-19, and the cytokine storm had been found to play a pivotal role in ARDS. Vigorous proinflammatory cytokines induced inflammatory cells infiltration and apoptosis of pulmonary endothelial cells, which contributed to vascular leakage together with the downregulation of E-cadherin caused by IL-6. Another consequence of the cytokine storm was the apoptosis of airway and alveolar epithelial cells, which results in alveolar edema [56]. Thus, the cytokine storm appears to be the dominating mechanism of ARDS.
Hypoxemia and systemic endothelial injury caused by ARDS may be the mechanisms that lead to the extrapulmonary dysfunction. Of patients on ventilators 89.7% had AKI while only 21.7% of nonventilated patients had AKI. Severe AKI most commonly occurred simultaneously with intubation and mechanical ventilation, which may imply the causal relationship between hypoxemia and AKI [57]. COVID-19 may predispose patients to thrombosis through several mechanisms. Directly, the endothelial injury caused the loss of anticoagulant function of the vascular lumen [58]. Dysregulation of coagulation-related genes and vasoconstriction [53] induced by hypoxia also promoted the vascular occlusion. What is more, multiorgan dysfunction could be found in COVID-19 patients without ARDS, which indicates additional mechanisms independent of ARDS. The autopsy of six COVID-19 patients with renal dysfunction showed high levels of CD68+ macrophages infiltrated into the tubulointerstitium, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 might induce kidney injury mediated by proinflammatory cytokines released from macrophages. In addition, pro-inflammatory cytokine, especially IL-6, IL-1, and TNF, could contribute to arrhythmia through regulating gap junctions and ion channels of cardiomyocytes. In detail, CX40 and CX43 are two subunits of gap junctions between atrial myocytes. TNF could impair expression and/or distribution of CX40 and CX43, and therefore inhibit the function of gap junctions, which could induce conduction slowing and heterogeneity in the atria, or even atrial fibrillation [59]. Moreover, TNF decreased specific K+ currents and increased L-type Ca2+ currents through downregulating ion channel expression and/or changing channel-gating kinetics. IL-6 and IL-1 could exert similar effects and these alterations may lead to prolongation of the action potential duration, the QT interval, and associated malignant arrhythmias [60].
Metabolic diseases exacerbate COVID-19
The pre-existing metabolic syndrome worsens COVID-19
People with pre-existing metabolic disorders have a higher prevalence of severe COVID-19 and in-hospital death [1]. Growing evidence supports that metabolic diseases potentially aggravates COVID-19, and the mechanisms can be summarized into three key points: dysregulation of ACE2, impaired immunity especially uncontrolled hyperinflammation, and hypercoagulability. Next, we will discuss several representative metabolic diseases, respectively (see Table 1 ).
Evidence | Putative Mechanisms |
---|---|
Diabetes | |
Obesity | |
Liver injury | |
Cardiovascular diseases | |
Kidney disease | |
COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ALT: alanine aminotransaminase; AST: aspartate aminotransaminase; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; ACEIs: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs: angiotensin receptor blockers.
Diabetes status correlated with higher severity, need for intensive medical care, and mortality [61]. First, dysregulation of ACE2 could affect the susceptibility and progression of COVID-19. Specifically, in a recent study, lung samples of 26 diabetic patients showed significantly increased protein levels of ACE2 in both alveolar and bronchial epithelium [62]. In mouse models with type 2 diabetes, the pancreatic ACE2 expression displayed an early increase and a late decrease, which may reveal the course from compensation to decompensation of β-cell dysfunction [63]. The seemly contradictive effects on ACE2 expression, upregulation [64, 65] or downregulation [66, 67], may result from different species, types of diabetes, studied organs, and stage of diseases chosen in different studies. ACE2 is a double-edged sword for COVID-19 patients as ACE2 could prevent diabetic complications like diabetic nephropathy [68] but potentially facilitate SARS-CoV-2 entry. Therefore, more clinical and laboratory evidence is needed to determine the authentic effects of diabetes on ACE2, and thus on COVID-19. Second, high glucose levels could damage immunity from many aspects. Hyperglycemia inhibited chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and toxic chemicals release to kill pathogens. Enhanced direct glycosylation of antibodies and structure alteration of complement by glucose can attenuate opsonization. Third, a high baseline pro-inflammatory state could exacerbate the cytokine storm in COVID-19 [69]. However, it should be noted that one study found only marginally increased inflammation in the lung in diabetic mice [70]. Fourth, in other animal models of disease, diabetes caused destruction in the structure of lungs, including collapse of the alveoli and greater permeability of the vasculature [71].
Patients with obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2, had a three-fold higher risk of severe illness and longer hospital stay [72]. The mechanisms underlying the significant association between obesity and COVID-19 severity are still unknown and there are several hypotheses. Obesity is featured by low-grade, chronic inflammation [73] and attenuated innate and adaptive immune response [74, 75], which therefore worsened the stress. Human adipose tissue may serve as a reservoir for specific pre-activated cytokines and thus prolong viral shedding [76]. Besides, increased small airways resistance, lower respiratory muscle strength, impaired gas exchange, higher prevalence of pulmonary embolism [77], and other respiratory dysfunctions are common in the obese. Also, obesity is associated with a higher risk of comorbidities leading to higher COVID-19 severity, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and kidney disease [78].
Liver injury with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), and bilirubin was common in patients with COVID-19, ranging from 14% to 53%. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), one of the most common global health burdens, was associated with 4–6-fold higher risk of severe COVID-19 and longer viral shedding time [79]. These patients often suffered from other metabolic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and hypertension that may exacerbate the disease simultaneously. However, after adjusting for some possible confounding factors, the incidence of severe COVID-19 was still 2-fold higher, suggesting additional mechanisms. As a great number of acute phase reactants, cytokines, and coagulation factors were synthesized and secreted by the liver, the altered liver synthetic function may provide higher inflammatory and coagulable basal levels [41]. Increased chemotactic factor MCP-1, IP10, and pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were commonly observed in MAFLD [80]. MAFLD was also featured by a prothrombotic state, possibly resulting from increased factor VIII, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) [81] and decreased protein C [82]. In addition, the procoagulant imbalance might explain the higher risk of cardiovascular events and hepatic fibrosis associated with MAFLD.
Cardiovascular diseases were prevalent among COVID-19 patients, among which hypertension was the most common comorbidity, with a prevalence of 21.1%. After adjustment for confounders, the risk of mortality was 2-fold higher in patients with hypertension than those without [83]. COVID-19 patients with hypertension displayed delayed viral clearance and some hypothesized it was caused by taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) and the subsequent upregulation of ACE2 [84]. The immune dysregulation was another putative mechanism that deciphered the relationship between hypertension and COVID-19. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dysregulation play a vital role in the pathogenesis of hypertension [85]. In particular, the proportion of immunosenescent proinflammatory cytotoxic CD8+ T cells was higher in patients with hypertension. The increased fraction of this phenotype may result in overproduction of cytokines and antiviral capacity retardation. An increase in IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α, CXCR3, etc., and a similar profile of cytokines with COVID-19, was observed in both hypertensive animal model and patients [86, 87].
AKI was associated with a 4.3-fold increased risk of severe COVID-19 [44] and kidney–lung crosstalk might play a central role. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema induced by fluid overload and noncardiogenic edema by inflammation-induced epithelial and endothelial apoptosis, has a detrimental effect on the gas exchange function and lung mechanics. In detail, serum cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and TNF were increased in AKI [88]. Dysregulation of the acid–base balance triggered not only pneumocyte dysfunction due to decreased enzymatic activity, but also pulmonary vasoconstriction and bronchoconstriction. Moreover, decreased oxygen-carrying capacity might be caused by impaired erythropoietin production of the kidneys [89]. For patients with chronic kidney disease, hypercoagulability due to increased strength and decreased breakdown of clots may augment the severity of COVID-19 [90].
Clinical treatments of metabolic diseases ameliorate COVID-19
Inference could be drawn that drugs for metabolic dysfunction would improve the symptoms and prognosis of COVID-19 due to their shared pathogenesis. Yet no specific drug for COVID-19 has been established. Repurposing of “old” drugs designed for metabolic disease would be an efficient approach as COVID-19 still being a public health emergency of international concern declared by the WHO. Moreover, the physiological status under COVID-19 may limit the use of certain drugs. Here, we investigated the potential effects and mechanisms of metabolic drugs on COVID-19 (see Table 2 ).
Drugs | Putative Mechanisms |
---|---|
Glucose-lowering | |
Anti-hypertensive | |
Cholesterol-lowering | |
Anti-obesity | |
Anti-coagulant | |
Antiplatelet | |
ADAM-17: A disintegrin and metalloprotease-17; ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; AMPK: AMP-activated protein kinase; CoV: coronavirus; GLP-1RA: glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists; ACEIs: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs: angiotensin receptor blockers; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019.
For glucose-lowering drugs, available evidence suggested insulin to be the best choice for glycemic control in diabetes patients with severe COVID-19. Whereas it remains unclear whether it has any direct impact on COVID-19, insulin reduced renal ADAM-17, the enzyme that cleaved and inactivated ACE2, and therefore resulted in ACE2 overexpression [91]. Metformin could reduce pulmonary injury in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ARDS mouse model and was associated with reduced mortality from chronic lower respiratory tract disease in a population-based prospective cohort [92, 93]. It could indirectly phosphorylate ACE2 and thereby bring about structural and functional changes of ACE2 via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation. These changes could hinder not only the binding of SARS-CoV-2, but also the following ACE2 downregulation [94]. However, the increased risk of lactic acidosis under a hypoxic state limited its use in patients with severe COVID-19. The incretin-based drug, GLP-1RA, might prevent CoVs entry via competitive binding to ACE2 [95] and induced ACE2 upregulation in both diabetic and control rats [96]. Metformin [97] and thiazolidinediones may also be potential medication in treating COVID-19 due to their anti-inflammatory properties [98].
Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in patients with COVID-19 [99] and ACEIs and ARBs are commonly used as the first-line antihypertensive medications. Results of different studies diverged as some found no difference in mortality between patients who used ACEIs/ARBs and those who did not use them, while others found a lower peak viral load [100], severity, and mortality after taking ACEIs/ARBs [101]. However, the effects of ACEIs/ARBs mediated by ACE2 remains paradoxical theoretically. ACEIs/ARBs increase ACE2 activity, which might facilitate viral entry into cells and result in the progression of COVID-19, although a cohort study of 18,472 patients found the use of ACEIs/ARBs had no association with a COVID-19-positive test, which suggests ACEIs/ARBs would not increase the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. On the other hand, more Ang II was converted into Ang (1–7), which was proven to inhibit inflammation. However, whether anti-inflammation is harmful or beneficial in COVID-19 remains elusive [102]. A more comprehensive hypothesis was that ACE2 upregulation could be harmful in the infection period but protective in the inflammation period [103]. What is more, we focused on lung ACE2, which may be a more reliable indicator of SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility compared with soluble ACE2 in the serum and urine. In animal models of H5N1 infection [104], chronic cigarette smoke exposure [105], and ARDS [106], pulmonary ACE2 decreased and were restored after taking losartan, a widely used ARB. As for captopril, the first ACEI on the market, it was found to increase lung ACE2 expression in both LPS and control groups [107]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no clinical data on the effects of ACEIs/ARBs on pulmonary ACE2. Furthermore, the conflicting results regarding the ACE2 expression also suggested more complex regulation of ACEIs/ARBs on ACE2 or other possible mechanisms [108]. Further investigation is needed while at present, various guidelines recommend continuation of ACEIs/ARBs during the COVID-19 pandemic [109].
As lipids are important components of viruses and are involved in the viral life cycle including viral fusion, replication, and exocytosis [110], we investigated the effect of a typical cholesterol-lowering drug, statin on COVID-19. Statins could exert beneficial effects through lipid rafts disturbance, immune modulation, and atherosclerotic plaques stabilization on SARS-CoV-2 or other virus infections [111]. Although a meta-analysis published in 2011 concluded that statins failed to reduce the risk of infections [112], more studies about using lipid-lowering drugs to fight against COVID-19 are needed. Cetilistat, a pancreatic lipase inhibitor, is a novel anti-obesity drug that inhibits fat digestion and absorption. It was comparable to remdesivir in reducing the viral particle production, viral antigen expression and viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro [113].
Antithrombotic drugs mainly include anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs. Heparin, a commonly used anticoagulant agent, seemed to improve the prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy [114]. Another anticoagulant drug nafamostat which is used to treat pancreatitis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), was identified to potently suppress the entry of CoVs including SARS-CoV-2 [115, 116]. The antiplatelet drug dipyridamole promoted host coagulation and immune system recovery in severe COVID-19 patients. It could also inhibit viral replication via its binding to SARS-CoV-2 membrane protein in vitro [117].
Off-label use of metabolic drugs, may not only reduce time and cost but also provide a novel strategy for further drug design and exploitation. However, more research is needed on the path from bench to bedside.
Summary: the crosstalk between metabolic diseases and COVID-19
In conclusion, growing evidence indicates the remarkable interplay between current COVID-19 and metabolic diseases ( Figure 1 ). Research on the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 is helping to discover their shared pathways, including dysregulation of ACE2, impaired immunity especially uncontrolled hyperinflammation, hypercoagulability, etc. These shared pathways potentially explain how metabolic diseases may exacerbate COVID-19, and vice versa. However, as most studies are observational, it is insufficient to infer the causal relationships. Accordingly, several metabolic drugs appear to improve the susceptibility, severity, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients. To date, no specific medicine is recommended to prevent or treat COVID-19 and the interdisciplinary integration of virology and medicine would guide the development of drugs repurposing and novel anti-viral strategies [118]. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 as well as metabolic disorders is the key to reducing mortality rate and improving the prognosis of patients with COVID-19.