Blog
About

23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Terminology and tensions within evidence-informed decision-making in South Africa over a 15-year period

      , ,

      Research for All

      UCL IOE Press

      EVIDENCE-INFORMED, EVIDENCE-BASED, TERMINOLOGY, DIVISION, INCLUSION

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this article, we examine a key premise underlying evidence-informed decisionmaking (EIDM) – that research is for all, including service users and potential users, service providers and a wide range of decision-makers, from those running local services to national government officials and international agencies. Qualitative data collected on terminology used when writing and talking about EIDM over a period of 15 years during the implementation of a number of capacity development programmes in South Africa were combined with critical reflections in practice. Findings reveal that tensions exist in the titles and terminology used to describe the relationships between academia and government or between research and policy, and that these tensions have shifted over time, but not necessarily diminished. An analysis and critique of this terminology is provided to identify and unpack these tensions, which challenge the central premise of 'research for all'. The perpetuation of divisive labels that profile people, of job titles and specific terminology that describe agency, as well as the use of technical language, continues to exclude people from the approach. These have the effect of setting up users against producers of evidence. In conclusion, we challenge the advocates of the EIDM approach to review language and terminology to be more inclusive, to enable relationship-building and ease the process of engagement to ensure evidence-informed decision-making is true to its premise that research is for all.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          72010652
          Research for All
          UCL IOE Press
          2399-8121
          15 July 2017
          : 1
          : 2
          : 252-264
          Article
          2399-8121(20170715)1:2L.252;1- s3.phd /ioep/rfa/2017/00000001/00000002/art00003
          10.18546/RFA.01.2.03
          Product
          Categories
          Language: Meanings and Tensions

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Research for All
          Volume 1, Issue 2

          Similar content 79

          Cited by 1