190
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

       

       

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      THE SOCIALIST PERSPECTIVE OF DIFFERENCE: TOWARDS A NEW COMPOSITION OF ITS MATERIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

      Published
      research-article
      ,
      World Review of Political Economy
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This article deals with the concept of "difference" as it is shaped socially, politically and philosophically, within the contemporary framework of postmodernism. Initially, it mentions and analyzes the paradox of today's capitalist world: while the production system tends to be integristic, the operational premise of production is fragmentation. In an age that subscribes unconditionally to the myth of the natural supremacy of capitalism, "difference" gives birth to "cultural policy," sidelining economic policy. At the same time, this notion is incorporated into the conceptual structure of philosophical-scientific field, as well as the notions of "otherness" and "Other." These notions surrender to the artifices of linguistic invention, slipping away from established meanings condemned to serve as a support for a specific power structure. In the framework of the socialist ideology whose core focus is the struggle against social injustice, economic exploitation and adjection, a proposal to maintain the centrality of the economicmaterial element of difference sounds commonplace. What seems open to exploitation and reflection is how "difference" is handled in the context of a socialist social practice.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            worlrevipoliecon
            10.2307/j50005553
            World Review of Political Economy
            Pluto Journals
            2042891X
            1 December 2010
            : 1
            : 4
            : 688-696
            Article
            10.2307/41931897
            cfc8fc4d-0c0c-4ed6-8510-2ae948dbe452
            © WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR POLITICAL ECONOMY 2010

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History

            Political economics

            References

            1. Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Oxford: Polity Press.

            2. Derrida, J. (1967) L 'écriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil.

            3. Eagleton, T. (1996) The Illusions of Postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

            4. Harvey, D. (1991) The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

            5. Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

            6. Kristeva, J. (1988) Etrangers à nous-mêmes. Paris: Fayard.

            7. Pandelidou, C. (2010) "Contemporary Urban Space and Subject: The Case of Gated Communities," in K. Tsoukala, M. Daniil, C. Pandelidou, eds., Sides of Postmodernity. Thessaloniki: Epikentro, pp. 133-178.

            8. Tsoukala, K. (2010) "Introduction: Sides of Postmodernity," in K. Tsoukala, M. Daniil, C. Pandelidou, eds., Sides of Postmodernity. Thessaloniki: Epikentro, pp. 15-50.

            9. Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology, New York: Verso.

            10. --- (2001) Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism? Five Essays in a (Mis) Use of a Notion, New York: Verso.

            Comments

            Comment on this article