Average rating: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 1 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
The subject is gender self identification. This topic only affects scotland. So this is not an impactful topic since its reach only is confined to scotland.
The methodology is case study method. It is one of qualitative research method.
The finding is the arbitraryness in policymaking or policy capture in scotland.
First of all in the background of gender self declaration one important law is missing. That is gender recognition act 2004. only equality act 2010 is mentioned many times. This is a serious fault because it shows only one side of the story.
The findings shows that the policymaking is arbitrary but many attempts of governments regarding gender self declaration by government of scotland is found. Even cabinet secretary of scotland issued statement on gender recognition.
Source : https://www.gov.scot/publications/statement-gender-recognition/
scottish government ran new consultations before updating gender laws. The Scottish government has postponed a planned update of gender recognition laws after concluding that it had failed to address concerns about the impact of its proposals. The government is that much careful in drafting gender related law.
professor alex sharpe published an article stating that gender self identification would not undermine woman’s right. That article or points from that article are not shown here. This article is also very relevant to this topic.
Source : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2230.12507
these laws and studies and moves by scottish government must be mentioned here to present a whole picture. But lack of them affects the validity of this study. This is a one side story.
Reference is also one sided since none of these facts are ever mentioned or countered. Reference comes from google scholar, govt. Site, bbc news an other sites giving credibility to the one side story: i mean the side which is shown here. So it is incomplete.
The article is somehow comprehensive as far as logical arrangement of structre is concerned.