Average rating: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
this study is the most appropriately designed and done. the context of this study is most recent. WHO recently raised concern about vaccine falsification. in this context this study can shed immense light.
the author collected valid sources. all are primary sources. the head of pfizers, the ventavia research, the department of health, FDA all are primary sources for vaccine preparation. so choice of source is great.
the collation of data is also excellant. all the matter starts from a letter of pfizer's head. it then goes to ventavia's fired executive to human rights organization to eport of health department. all the sources are chronologically arranged in order of happenings of events.
this study is a kind of news report. it is not a study to find something. rather a study to inform something. it is a news report rather than a study.
the information is given in a way that one could easily understand what is happening. and then it is comprehensible.