Average rating: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 3 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 2 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
Major Suggestions
The manuscript does not define all variables nor the methodology used to calculate the indicators. Without this information, it is not possible to cite this paper. At the very least, I suggest adding more information on the variables, "Economic conditions", "Governance of PC”, "PC workforce", "Health of population”, and "Structure of PC”.
Along the above lines, in the abstract, it is cited that there are improvements in “life expectancy at birth" since 2007; but, the actual paper does not provide an evolution along time in a simple table or graph.
Minor Suggestions
Consider consulting an English native speaker. For example, on page 3, “put into” in the sentence, "Results of reviewed literature were put into a matrix in order to get insight which indicators were retrieved”, should be changed to “organized in”. Additionally, the second paragraph of the section, “Data Representation” is not very clear, and it should be rewritten. What were the authors trying to communicate here?
In the first paragraph of page 4, explain how to correct for missing data. Probably the averages are weigthed according to the amount of missing data and this must be written in the methodology.
In the first paragraph of the section “Workforce PC”, the authors state that “PC health centres offer services to an average of 5100 people”. Is that daily? weekly? monthly? In the same paragraph, the sentence beginning, “Examples the type of…” should be rewritten: “Examples of types of disciplines…”.
Lastly, here is an additional reference which could help...
Published by the World Bank in 2015: Toward Universal Health Coverage and Equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from Selected Countries at http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0454-0