260
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0
shares
    • Review: found
    Is Open Access

    Review of 'Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.'

    Bookmark
    5
    Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.Crossref
    Research Counts, Not the Journal
    Average rating:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of importance:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of validity:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of completeness:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Level of comprehensibility:
        Rated 5 of 5.
    Competing interests:
    None

    Reviewed article

    • Record: found
    • Abstract: not found
    • Article: not found

    Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

    P O Seglen (1997)
      Bookmark

      Review information

      10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-CHEM.ALMA1H.v1.RUNKXN
      This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com.

      Chemistry
      Bias (Epidemiology),Bibliometrics,Databases, Factual,Medicine,Periodicals as Topic,Publishing,Research,Specialization
      ScienceOpen disciplines:
      Keywords:

      Review text

      Comments

      Comment on this review

      Version and Review History