13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid‐Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease may not achieve adequate low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL‐C) lowering on statin monotherapy, attributed partly to atherogenic dyslipidemia. More intensive LDL‐C–lowering therapy can be considered for these patients. A previous randomized, controlled study demonstrated greater LDL‐C lowering in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease who switched from simvastatin 20 mg (S20) or atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) to combination ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg (ES10/20) therapy, compared with statin dose‐doubling (to S40 or A20) or switching to rosuvastatin 10 mg (R10). The effect of these regimens on novel biomarkers of atherogenic dyslipidemia (low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number and lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2 [Lp‐PLA 2]) was assessed.

          Methods and Results

          Treatment effects on low‐ and high‐density lipoprotein particle number ( by NMR) and Lp‐PLA 2 (by ELISA) were evaluated using plasma samples available from 358 subjects in the study. Switching to ES10/20 reduced low‐density lipoprotein‐particle number numerically more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10 (−133.3, −94.4, and −56.3 nmol/L, respectively; P>0.05). Increases in high‐density lipoprotein particle number were significantly greater with switches to ES10/20 versus statin dose‐doubling (1.5 and −0.5 μmol/L; P<0.05) and comparable with R10 (0.7 μmol/L; P>0.05). Percentages of patients attaining low‐density lipoprotein particle number levels <990 nmol/L were 62.4% for ES10/20, 54.1% for statin dose‐doubling, and 57.0% for R10. Switching to ES10/20 reduced Lp‐PLA 2 activity significantly more than did statin dose‐doubling (−28.0 versus −3.8 nmol/min per mL, P<0.05) and was comparable with R10 (−28.0 versus −18.6 nmol/min per mL; P>0.05); effects on Lp‐PLA 2 concentration were modest.

          Conclusions

          In diabetic patients with dyslipidemia, switching from statins to combination ES10/20 therapy generally improved lipoprotein subclass profile and Lp‐PLA 2 activity more than did statin dose‐doubling and was comparable with R10, consistent with its lipid effects.

          Clinical Trial Registration

          URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00862251.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults

          Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.

            Many developments have occurred since the publication of the widely-used 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Dyslipidemia guidelines. Here, we present an updated version of the guidelines, incorporating new recommendations based on recent findings and harmonizing CCS guidelines with those from other Societies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used, per present standards of the CCS. The total cardiovascular disease Framingham Risk Score (FRS), modified for a family history of premature coronary disease, is recommended for risk assessment. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remains the primary target of therapy. However, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol has been added to apolipoprotein B as an alternate target. There is an increased emphasis on treatment of higher risk patients, including those with chronic kidney disease and high risk hypertension. The primary panel has recommended a judicious use of secondary testing for subjects in whom the need for statin therapy is unclear. Expanded information on health behaviours is presented and is the backbone of risk reduction in all subjects. Finally, a systematic approach to statin intolerance is advocated to maximize appropriate use of lipid-lowering therapy. This document presents the recommendations and principal conclusions of this process. Along with associated Supplementary Material that can be accessed online, this document will be part of a program of knowledge translation. The goal is to increase the appropriate use of evidence-based cardiovascular disease event risk assessment in the management of dyslipidemia as a fundamental means of reducing global risk in the Canadian population. Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                20 October 2015
                October 2015
                : 4
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.2015.4.issue-10 )
                : e001675
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Biomarker Core LaboratoryAtlanta VAMC Decatur GA
                [ 2 ]Merck Research Laboratories Kenilworth NJ
                [ 3 ]Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Ngoc‐Anh Le, Biomarker Core Laboratory, Room 4A186, Atlanta VAMC, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033. E‐mail: anh.le@ 123456va.gov
                Article
                JAH31099
                10.1161/JAHA.114.001675
                4845107
                26486166
                41910415-afa7-4d25-8279-66e000e288d4
                © 2015 The Authors. [Ngoc‐Anh Le and Peter W. F. Wilson] and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. All rights reserved. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 12 December 2014
                : 03 August 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: Merck Research Laboratories
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jah31099
                October 2015
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:03.03.2016

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                diabetes mellitus,ezetimibe,lipoprotein particle number,lipoprotein subclasses,lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase a2,nmr spectroscopy,rosuvastatin,simvastatin

                Comments

                Comment on this article