12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Short-term follow-up of masticatory adaptation after rehabilitation with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis: a pilot assessment.

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When teeth are extracted, sensory function is decreased by a loss of periodontal ligament receptions. When replacing teeth by oral implants, one hopes to restore the sensory feedback pathway as such to allow for physiological implant integration and optimized oral function with implant-supported prostheses. What remains to be investigated is how to adapt to different oral rehabilitations. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess four aspects of masticatory adaptation after rehabilitation with an immediately loaded implant-supported prosthesis and to observe how each aspect will recover respectively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions.

          It has been suggested that the provision of dental implants can improve the oral function of subjects with severely resorbed mandibles, possibly restoring function to the level experienced by satisfied wearers of conventional complete dentures. Nevertheless, a quantitative comparison has never been made and can be drawn from the literature only with difficulty, since studies differ greatly in methodology. To make such a comparison, we measured bite force and chewing efficiency by using identical methods in subjects with overdentures, complete full dentures, and natural dentitions. Our results indicated that bite forces achieved with overdentures on dental implants were between those achieved with artificial and natural dentitions. Chewing efficiency was significantly greater than that of subjects with full dentures (low mandible), but was still lower than that of subjects with full dentures (high mandible) and overdentures on bare roots. Differences in the height of the mandible revealed significant differences in chewing efficiency between the two full-denture groups. Furthermore, subjects with a shortened dental arch exerted bite forces similar to those of subjects with a complete-natural dentition, but their chewing efficiency was limited due to the reduced occlusal area. For all groups combined, a significant correlation was found between maximum bite force and chewing efficiency. Nearly half of the variation in chewing efficiency was explained by bite force alone.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults.

            Masticatory performance results from a complex interplay of direct and indirect effects, yet most studies employ univariate models. This study tested a multivariate model of masticatory performance for dentate subjects. Explanatory variables included number of functional tooth units, bite force, sex, age, masseter cross-sectional area, presence of temporomandibular disorders, and presence of diabetes mellitus. The population-based sample consisted of 631 dentate subjects aged 37-80 years. Covariance structure analysis showed that 68% of the variability in masticatory performance could be explained by the combined effects of the explanatory variables. Age and sex did not show a strong effect on masticatory performance, either directly or indirectly through masseter cross-sectional area, temporomandibular disorders, and bite force. Number of functional tooth units and bite force were confirmed as the key determinants of masticatory performance, which suggests that their maintenance may be of major importance for promoting healthful functional status.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adaptation of healthy mastication to factors pertaining to the individual or to the food.

              Mastication is a physiological process controlled by the central nervous system and modulated by inputs from the mouth. Both the intrinsic characteristics of the subject and the extrinsic characteristics of the chewed food are responsible for variations of the masticatory function. Age, gender and dental state constitute the most studied intrinsic factors whereas hardness, rheological characteristics such as plasticity or elasticity, and food size are the better known extrinsic factors. These factors cause physiological adaptations which can occur during individual cycles or the whole sequence of mastication. Electromyographic and jaw movements (kinematic) recordings are commonly used to study mastication, from which, several variables can be measured. Vertical and lateral amplitudes and, velocities of jaw movements, are only given by kinematic recordings. Bioelectrical activities per cycle or per sequence are closely linked to masticatory forces and are measured from electromyographic recordings. Number of cycles, sequence duration and masticatory frequency can be measured from both types of recordings. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the variations of the measured masticatory variables that occur when mastication adapts to changes in characteristics of the individual or the food.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Implant Dent
                International journal of implant dentistry
                Springer Nature
                2198-4034
                Dec 2017
                : 3
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki University, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8588, Japan. mihobonn@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
                [2 ] Centre for Periodontology and Implantology Leuven, IJzerenmolenstraat 110, B-3001, Heverlee, Belgium. mihobonn@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
                [3 ] Centre for Periodontology and Implantology Leuven, IJzerenmolenstraat 110, B-3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
                [4 ] OMFS IMPATH, Department of Imaging & Pathology, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
                [5 ] Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
                [6 ] Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki University, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8588, Japan.
                Article
                10.1186/s40729-017-0070-x
                10.1186/s40729-017-0070-x
                5340790
                28271438
                fe65592c-a4f1-40b3-8c95-d0536a08864e
                History

                Dental implants,Immediate loading,Masticatory function,Physiologic adaptation

                Comments

                Comment on this article