2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Improving Information Sharing for Youth in Foster Care

      case-report
      , MD, MS a , b , , , PhD a , c , , PhD, PhD a , d , e , , MIS d , , BS b , , PhD a , d , f
      Pediatrics
      American Academy of Pediatrics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We describe the development of an information sharing system between the EHR and the child welfare database to improve health care delivery for children in custody.

          Abstract

          There are ∼443 000 children in child protective custody (ie, foster care) in the United States. Children in protective custody have more medical, behavioral, and developmental problems that require health care services than the general population. These health problems are compounded by poor information exchange impeding care coordination. Health care providers often do not know which of their patients are in protective custody and are not privy to the critical social history collected by child protective services, including placement history and maltreatment history. Meanwhile, the custodial child protection agency and designated caregivers (ie, foster caregivers and kinship providers) often lack vital elements of the health history of children in their care, which can result in poor health care delivery such as medication lapses, immunization delay, and poor chronic disease management. In this case study, we address this critical component of health care delivery for a vulnerable population by describing a process of developing an information sharing system between health care and child welfare organizations in collaboration with child protection community partners. Lessons learned include recommended steps for improved information sharing: (1) develop shared community vision, (2) determine shareable information components, (3) implement and analyze information sharing approaches, and (4) evaluate information sharing efforts. A successful example of advocating for improvement of information sharing for youth in protective custody is explored to highlight these steps. In collaboration with child protective services, pediatricians can improve information sharing to impact both health care delivery and child protection outcomes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Pediatrics
          Pediatrics
          pediatrics
          pediatrics
          Pediatrics
          Pediatrics
          American Academy of Pediatrics (Elk Grove Village, IL, USA )
          0031-4005
          1098-4275
          August 2019
          1 August 2019
          1 August 2020
          : 144
          : 2
          : e20190580
          Affiliations
          [a ]Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; and
          Divisions of [b ]General and Community Pediatrics,
          [c ]Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology,
          [d ]Biomedical Informatics,
          [e ]Emergency Medicine, and
          [f ]Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to Mary V. Greiner, MD, MS, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, ML 2011, Cincinnati, OH 45229. E-mail: mary.greiner@ 123456cchmc.org
          Article
          PMC6702031 PMC6702031 6702031 peds.2019-0580
          10.1542/peds.2019-0580
          6702031
          31363072
          e778d30a-cccc-4b98-922b-c0a56c274be5
          Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
          History
          : 29 May 2019
          Page count
          Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 17, Pages: 8
          Categories
          4.00
          27.00
          27.03
          Advocacy Case Study
          Custom metadata
          v1

          Comments

          Comment on this article