29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism?

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Why have birds evolved the ability to reject eggs? Typically, foreign egg discrimination is interpreted as evidence that interspecific brood parasitism (IP) has selected for the host's ability to recognize and eliminate foreign eggs. Fewer studies explore the alternative hypothesis that rejection of interspecific eggs is a by-product of host defenses, evolved against conspecific parasitism (CP). We performed a large scale study with replication across taxa (two congeneric Turdus thrushes), space (populations), time (breeding seasons), and treatments (three types of experimental eggs), using a consistent design of egg rejection experiments (n = 1057 nests; including controls), in areas with potential IP either present (Europe; native populations) or absent (New Zealand; introduced populations). These comparisons benefited from the known length of allopatry (one and a half centuries), with no gene flow between native and introduced populations, which is rarely available in host-parasite systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Evolution of Conspecific Acceptance Thresholds

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Experimental and Teleonomic Investigation of Avian Brood Parasitism

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

              One of the most striking outcomes of coevolution between species is egg mimicry by brood parasitic birds, resulting from rejection behavior by discriminating host parents. Yet, how exactly does a host detect a parasitic egg? Brood parasitism and egg rejection behavior provide a model system for exploring the relative importance of different visual cues used in a behavioral task. Although hosts are discriminating, we do not know exactly what cues they use, and to answer this it is crucial to account for the receiver's visual perception. Color, luminance ("perceived lightness") and pattern information have never been simultaneously quantified and experimentally tested through a bird's eye. The cuckoo finch Anomalospiza imberbis and its hosts show spectacular polymorphisms in egg appearance, providing a good opportunity for investigating visual discrimination owing to the large range of patterns and colors involved. Here we combine field experiments in Africa with modeling of avian color vision and pattern discrimination to identify the specific visual cues used by hosts in making rejection decisions. We found that disparity between host and foreign eggs in both color and several aspects of pattern (dispersion, principal marking size, and variability in marking size) were important predictors of rejection, especially color. These cues correspond exactly to the principal differences between host and parasitic eggs, showing that hosts use the most reliable available cues in making rejection decisions, and select for parasitic eggs that are increasingly mimetic in a range of visual attributes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front. Zool.
                Frontiers in zoology
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1742-9994
                1742-9994
                2014
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 17. listopadu 50, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
                [2 ] Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
                [3 ] School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
                Article
                1742-9994-11-34
                10.1186/1742-9994-11-34
                4022367
                24834103
                4c4b48c1-4ac7-4f57-8508-e0a0752dbd2f
                History

                Coevolution,Collateral damage,Discrimination,Heterospecific brood parasitism,Intraspecific brood parasitism,Species introductions

                Comments

                Comment on this article