38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Communities of practice for supporting health systems change: a missed opportunity

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Communities of practice (CoPs) have been used in the health sector to support professional practice change. However, little is known about how CoPs might be used to influence a system that requires change at and across various levels (i.e. front line care, organizational, governmental). In this paper we examine the experience of a CoP in the Canadian province of Ontario as it engages in improving the care of seniors. Our aim is to shed light on using CoPs to facilitate systems change.

          Methods

          This paper draws on year one findings of a larger multiple case study that is aiming to increase understanding of knowledge translation processes mobilized through CoPs. In this paper we strategically report on one case to illustrate a critical example of a CoP trying to effect systems change. Primary data included semi-structured interviews with CoP members (n = 8), field notes from five planning meetings, and relevant background documents. Data analysis included deductive coding (i.e. pre-determined codes aligned with the larger project) and inductive coding which allowed codes and themes to emerge. A thorough description of the case was prepared using all the coded data.

          Results

          The CoP recognized a need to support health professionals (nurses, dentists) and related paraprofessionals with knowledge, experience, and resources to appropriately address their clients’ oral health care needs. Accordingly, the CoP led a knowledge-to-action initiative that involved a seven-part webinar series meant to transfer step-by-step, skill-based knowledge through live and archived webinars. Although the core planning team functioned effectively to develop the webinars, the CoP was challenged by organizational and long-term care sector cultures, as well as governmental structures within the broader health context.

          Conclusion

          The provincial CoP functioned as an incubator that brought together best practices, research, experiences, a reflective learning cycle, and passionate champions. Nevertheless, the CoP’s efforts to stimulate practice changes were met with broader resistance. Research about how to use CoPs to influence health systems change is needed given that CoPs are being tasked with this goal.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0023-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

          (2013)
          This article examines five common misunderstandings about case-study research: (1) Theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge; (2) One cannot generalize from a single case, therefore the single case study cannot contribute to scientific development; (3) The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, while other methods are more suitable for hypotheses testing and theory building; (4) The case study contains a bias toward verification; and (5) It is often difficult to summarize specific case studies. The article explains and corrects these misunderstandings one by one and concludes with the Kuhnian insight that a scientific discipline without a large number of thoroughly executed case studies is a discipline without systematic production of exemplars, and that a discipline without exemplars is an ineffective one. Social science may be strengthened by the execution of more good case studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Case study research: Design and methods

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework.

              Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework--evidence, context, and facilitation--leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                akothari@uwo.ca
                jboyko@uwo.ca
                james.conklin@concordia.ca
                stolee@uwaterloo.ca
                ssibbald@uwo.ca
                Journal
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Res Policy Syst
                Health Research Policy and Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1478-4505
                25 July 2015
                25 July 2015
                2015
                : 13
                : 33
                Affiliations
                [ ]Western University, School of Health Studies and Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, 1151 Richmond St, London, N6A 3K7 Canada
                [ ]Western University, School of Health Studies and Faculty of Information and Media Studies, London, Canada
                [ ]Department of Applied Human Sciences and Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Concordia University, Portland, USA
                [ ]University of Waterloo, School of Public Health and Health Systems, Waterloo, Canada
                [ ]Western University, School of Health Studies, Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health and Department of Family Medicine, London, Canada
                Article
                23
                10.1186/s12961-015-0023-x
                4515005
                306d1abc-407e-40c1-aeac-07339965bc88
                © Kothari et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 19 December 2014
                : 10 July 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Health & Social care
                communities of practice,health systems,knowledge translation,long-term care

                Comments

                Comment on this article