13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists: two-arm randomised controlled trial

      abstract
      1 , , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3
      Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
      BioMed Central
      International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drugs (INEBRIA) Meeting 2013
      18-20 September 2013

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The UK Department of Health’s aim is to involve community pharmacists in the delivery of alcohol brief intervention (BI). This possibility extends the settings in which BIs have been delivered and has attracted international attention. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of BI delivered by community pharmacists in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in London. A two-arm RCT was conducted to determine the effectiveness of BI delivered by community pharmacists. Pharmacists and their support staff were trained in the trial procedures. Pharmacy support staff (N = 23) approached and informed customers about the study, to support formal recruitment by the community pharmacist (N = 17). Eligible and consenting pharmacy customers (aged≥18 years) at the 16 community pharmacies were randomised in equal numbers to either BI delivered by a community pharmacist or a non-intervention control condition, conducted in the pharmacy consultation room. The intervention was a brief motivational discussion of approximately 10 minutes duration. Participants randomised to the control arm were given an alcohol information leaflet with no opportunity for discussion. At 3-month follow up, alcohol consumption and related problems were assessed with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) administered by telephone. Of the 1440 customers approached, 541 (38%) consented to participate. Of those who consented, 409 were identified as hazardous/harmful drinkers (AUDIT 8-19), 94 as low risk drinkers (AUDIT≤7), and 38 as possibly dependent drinkers (AUDIT≥20), with the latter two groups excluded from the trial. The 409 trial participants were followed up at three months (follow-up rate ≥80%). Data analysis is under way and the preliminary main trial results are presented here. This is the first presentation of trial outcomes from this internationally significant study.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Conference
          Addict Sci Clin Pract
          Addict Sci Clin Pract
          Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
          BioMed Central
          1940-0632
          1940-0640
          2013
          4 September 2013
          : 8
          : Suppl 1
          : A21
          Affiliations
          [1 ]King’s College London, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, London, UK
          [2 ]King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, Pharmaceutical Science Clinical Academic Group, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, UK
          [3 ]London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London, UK
          Article
          1940-0640-8-S1-A21
          10.1186/1940-0640-8-S1-A21
          3766004
          69ca8804-51dc-4622-bbec-8fe17f924a9a
          Copyright ©2013 Dhital et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drugs (INEBRIA) Meeting 2013
          Rome, Italy
          18-20 September 2013
          History
          Categories
          Meeting Abstract

          Health & Social care
          Health & Social care

          Comments

          Comment on this article