Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Neonatal complications associated with use of fetal scalp electrode: a retrospective study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To estimate the incidence and risk of complications associated with fetal scalp electrode and to determine whether its application in the setting of operative vaginal delivery was associated with increased neonatal morbidity.

          Design

          Retrospective cohort study.

          Setting

          Twelve clinical centers with 19 hospitals across nine American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists US districts.

          Population

          Women in the United States.

          Methods

          We evaluated 171,698 women with singleton deliveries ≥ 23 weeks gestation in a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor study between 2002 and 2008, after excluding conditions that precluded fetal scalp electrode application such as prelabor cesarean delivery. Secondary analysis limited to operative vaginal deliveries ≥ 34 weeks of gestation also was performed.

          Main outcome measures

          Incidences and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of neonatal complications were calculated, controlling for maternal characteristics, delivery mode and pregnancy complications.

          Results

          Fetal scalp electrode was used in 37,492 (22%) of deliveries. In non-operative vaginal delivery, fetal scalp electrode was associated with increased risk of injury to scalp due to birth trauma (1.2% vs 0.9%; aOR=1.62; 95%CI=1.41–1.86) and cephalohematoma (1.0% vs 0.9%; aOR=1.57; 95%CI=1.36–1.83). Neonatal complications were not significantly different comparing fetal scalp electrode with vacuum assisted vaginal delivery and vacuum assisted vaginal delivery alone or comparing fetal scalp electrode with forceps assisted vaginal delivery and forceps assisted vaginal delivery alone.

          Conclusions

          We found increased neonatal morbidity with fetal scalp electrode though the absolute risk is very low. It is possible that these findings reflect an underlying indication for its use. Our findings support the use of fetal scalp electrode when clinically indicated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles.

          (2009)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

            To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008. The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The 31.2% of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9% of all cesarean sections. The 28.8% of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1%. The 43.8% women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation. To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor. Published by Mosby, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 86: Viral hepatitis in pregnancy.

              (2007)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                100935741
                21682
                BJOG
                BJOG
                BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
                1470-0328
                1471-0528
                27 October 2015
                08 December 2015
                October 2016
                01 October 2017
                : 123
                : 11
                : 1797-1803
                Affiliations
                [a ]Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States
                [b ]Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
                [c ]Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Tetsuya Kawakita, MD, 101 Irving Street, NW, 5B63, Washington, DC 20010; tetsuya.x.kawakita@ 123456gunet.georgetown.edu
                Article
                PMC4899296 PMC4899296 4899296 nihpa732862
                10.1111/1471-0528.13817
                4899296
                26643181
                f4e65aca-e6ce-466c-83f8-674acc0550e3
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Cephalohematoma,fetal scalp electrode,scalp injury
                Cephalohematoma, fetal scalp electrode, scalp injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article