26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Residential preferences versus sustainable cities:Quantitative and qualitative evidence from a survey of relocating owner-occupiers

      , ,
      Town Planning Review
      Liverpool University Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The paper addresses the question of the acceptability to residents of policies promoting more sustainable urban forms through compaction or intensification and greater land use mixing. It does so by examining the motives, behaviour and preferences of a sample of households moving house within the owner-occupied sector in the Cardiff region of South Wales. The findings suggest that most relocating households prefer, and actively seek to move to, less sustainable detached or semi-detached housing with private gardens, often in suburban locations. Apartment living and city centre and dockland locations are rarely preferred. Access to facilities in mixed land use areas appears not to be a prominent concern for many. To reconcile these results with the apparent buoyancy of housing markets in central city and dockland locations, the characteristics and preferences of residents in these areas are examined.

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Town Planning Review
                Town Planning Review
                Liverpool University Press
                0041-0020
                1478-341X
                September 2004
                September 2004
                : 75
                : 3
                : 337-357
                Article
                10.3828/tpr.75.3.5
                718c534b-2185-4b4f-bd79-d7b2f36f59d9
                © 2004
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article