29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Locoregional Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection With or Without Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Long-Term Follow-Up from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (Alliance) ACOSOG Z0011 Randomized Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Objective

          The early results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial demonstrated no difference in locoregional recurrence for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) randomized either to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or SLN dissection (SLND) alone. We now report long-term locoregional recurrence results.

          Methods

          ACOSOG Z0011 prospectively examined overall survival of patients with SLN metastases undergoing breast-conserving therapy randomized to undergo ALND after SLND or no further axillary specific treatment. Locoregional recurrence was prospectively evaluated and compared between the groups.

          Results

          Four hundred forty-six patients were randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND plus ALND. Both groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, ER status, adjuvant systemic therapy, histology, and tumor size. Patients randomized to ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared to a median of only 2 SLNs removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND, as expected, also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 9.25 years, there was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (P=0.13). The cumulative incidence of nodal recurrences at 10 years was 0.5% in the ALND arm and 1.5% in the SLND alone arm (P=0.28). Ten-year cumulative locoregional recurrence was 6.2% with ALND and 5.3% with SLND alone (P=0.36).

          Conclusion

          Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND offers excellent regional control for selected patients with early metastatic breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials

          The Lancet, 365(9472), 1687-1717
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial.

            Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment. The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided. The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.50; absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P .05). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

              Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) accurately identifies nodal metastasis of early breast cancer, but it is not clear whether further nodal dissection affects survival. To determine the effects of complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on survival of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis of breast cancer. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial, a phase 3 noninferiority trial conducted at 115 sites and enrolling patients from May 1999 to December 2004. Patients were women with clinical T1-T2 invasive breast cancer, no palpable adenopathy, and 1 to 2 SLNs containing metastases identified by frozen section, touch preparation, or hematoxylin-eosin staining on permanent section. Targeted enrollment was 1900 women with final analysis after 500 deaths, but the trial closed early because mortality rate was lower than expected. All patients underwent lumpectomy and tangential whole-breast irradiation. Those with SLN metastases identified by SLND were randomized to undergo ALND or no further axillary treatment. Those randomized to ALND underwent dissection of 10 or more nodes. Systemic therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall survival was the primary end point, with a noninferiority margin of a 1-sided hazard ratio of less than 1.3 indicating that SLND alone is noninferior to ALND. Disease-free survival was a secondary end point. Clinical and tumor characteristics were similar between 445 patients randomized to ALND and 446 randomized to SLND alone. However, the median number of nodes removed was 17 with ALND and 2 with SLND alone. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years (last follow-up, March 4, 2010), 5-year overall survival was 91.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1%-94.5%) with ALND and 92.5% (95% CI, 90.0%-95.1%) with SLND alone; 5-year disease-free survival was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.3%-86.3%) with ALND and 83.9% (95% CI, 80.2%-87.9%) with SLND alone. The hazard ratio for treatment-related overall survival was 0.79 (90% CI, 0.56-1.11) without adjustment and 0.87 (90% CI, 0.62-1.23) after adjusting for age and adjuvant therapy. Among patients with limited SLN metastatic breast cancer treated with breast conservation and systemic therapy, the use of SLND alone compared with ALND did not result in inferior survival. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003855.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0372354
                646
                Ann Surg
                Ann. Surg.
                Annals of surgery
                0003-4932
                1528-1140
                8 October 2016
                September 2016
                01 September 2017
                : 264
                : 3
                : 413-420
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
                [2 ]Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Cornell Medicine / New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
                [3 ]Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
                [4 ]Dallas Surgical Group, Dallas, TX
                [5 ]Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, TN
                [6 ]Morton Plant Hospital, Clear Water, FL
                [7 ]University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Surgery, Dallas, TX
                [8 ]McLaren Regional Medical Center, Michigan State University, Flint, MI
                [9 ]Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
                [10 ]M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Armando E. Giuliano, MD, Professor of Surgery, Executive Vice-Chair, Surgery, Associate Director, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 310 N. San Vicente Blvd., Third Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90048, PH: 310-423-9970, FAX: 310-423-9577, Armando.Giuliano@ 123456cshs.org
                Article
                PMC5070540 PMC5070540 5070540 nihpa821701
                10.1097/SLA.0000000000001863
                5070540
                27513155
                9ff12093-e4cc-4008-a6a3-b763465785aa
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article