37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Regional asynchronicity in dairy production and processing in early farming communities of the northern Mediterranean

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          This unique research combines the analyses of lipid residues in pottery vessels with slaughter profiles for domesticated ruminants to provide compelling evidence for diverse subsistence strategies in the northern Mediterranean basin during the Neolithic. Our findings show that the exploitation and processing of milk varied across the region, although most communities began to exploit milk as soon as domesticates were introduced between 9,000 and 7,000 y ago. This discovery is especially noteworthy as the shift in human subsistence toward milk production reshaped prehistoric European culture, biology, and economy in ways that are still visible today.

          Abstract

          In the absence of any direct evidence, the relative importance of meat and dairy productions to Neolithic prehistoric Mediterranean communities has been extensively debated. Here, we combine lipid residue analysis of ceramic vessels with osteo-archaeological age-at-death analysis from 82 northern Mediterranean and Near Eastern sites dating from the seventh to fifth millennia BC to address this question. The findings show variable intensities in dairy and nondairy activities in the Mediterranean region with the slaughter profiles of domesticated ruminants mirroring the results of the organic residue analyses. The finding of milk residues in very early Neolithic pottery (seventh millennium BC) from both the east and west of the region contrasts with much lower intensities in sites of northern Greece, where pig bones are present in higher frequencies compared with other locations. In this region, the slaughter profiles of all domesticated ruminants suggest meat production predominated. Overall, it appears that milk or the by-products of milk was an important foodstuff, which may have contributed significantly to the spread of these cultural groups by providing a nourishing and sustainable product for early farming communities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Earliest date for milk use in the Near East and southeastern Europe linked to cattle herding.

          The domestication of cattle, sheep and goats had already taken place in the Near East by the eighth millennium bc. Although there would have been considerable economic and nutritional gains from using these animals for their milk and other products from living animals-that is, traction and wool-the first clear evidence for these appears much later, from the late fifth and fourth millennia bc. Hence, the timing and region in which milking was first practised remain unknown. Organic residues preserved in archaeological pottery have provided direct evidence for the use of milk in the fourth millennium in Britain, and in the sixth millennium in eastern Europe, based on the delta(13)C values of the major fatty acids of milk fat. Here we apply this approach to more than 2,200 pottery vessels from sites in the Near East and southeastern Europe dating from the fifth to the seventh millennia bc. We show that milk was in use by the seventh millennium; this is the earliest direct evidence to date. Milking was particularly important in northwestern Anatolia, pointing to regional differences linked with conditions more favourable to cattle compared to other regions, where sheep and goats were relatively common and milk use less important. The latter is supported by correlations between the fat type and animal bone evidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe.

            The introduction of dairying was a critical step in early agriculture, with milk products being rapidly adopted as a major component of the diets of prehistoric farmers and pottery-using late hunter-gatherers. The processing of milk, particularly the production of cheese, would have been a critical development because it not only allowed the preservation of milk products in a non-perishable and transportable form, but also it made milk a more digestible commodity for early prehistoric farmers. The finding of abundant milk residues in pottery vessels from seventh millennium sites from north-western Anatolia provided the earliest evidence of milk processing, although the exact practice could not be explicitly defined. Notably, the discovery of potsherds pierced with small holes appear at early Neolithic sites in temperate Europe in the sixth millennium BC and have been interpreted typologically as 'cheese-strainers', although a direct association with milk processing has not yet been demonstrated. Organic residues preserved in pottery vessels have provided direct evidence for early milk use in the Neolithic period in the Near East and south-eastern Europe, north Africa, Denmark and the British Isles, based on the δ(13)C and Δ(13)C values of the major fatty acids in milk. Here we apply the same approach to investigate the function of sieves/strainer vessels, providing direct chemical evidence for their use in milk processing. The presence of abundant milk fat in these specialized vessels, comparable in form to modern cheese strainers, provides compelling evidence for the vessels having being used to separate fat-rich milk curds from the lactose-containing whey. This new evidence emphasizes the importance of pottery vessels in processing dairy products, particularly in the manufacture of reduced-lactose milk products among lactose-intolerant prehistoric farming communities.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Kill-off Patterns in Sheep and Goats: the Mandibles from Aşvan Kale

              Reports on animal bones from archaeological sites often include information about the “kill-off pattern” for each species – i.e. the relative representation of different age-groups in the sample. Osteologists believe that this information can be used as evidence for whether an animal was wild or domesticated, and, if domesticated, about the way in which man managed the animal. In this paper a method is described for recording such data for sheep and goat using mandibles and mandibular teeth; the analysis and interpretation of such data is discussed using excavated samples from Aşvan Kale.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                29 November 2016
                14 November 2016
                : 113
                : 48
                : 13594-13599
                Affiliations
                [1] aDepartment of Archaeology, BioArCh, University of York , York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom;
                [2] bPlant Foods in Hominin Dietary Ecology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
                [3] cInstitut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie des Mittelaters, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen , Schloss Hohentübingen, 72070 Tübingen, Germany;
                [4] dUnité Mixte de Recherche 7209, Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités , 75005 Paris, France;
                [5] eOrganic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol , Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom;
                [6] f Human and Social Sciences, Collège de France , 75005 Paris, France;
                [7] gUnité Mixte de Recherche 5608, Travaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, les Espaces et les Sociétés, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Toulouse–Jean Jaurès , Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 31059 Toulouse, France;
                [8] hSoprintendenza Archeologia della Puglia, Centro Operativo per l’Archeologia della Daunia , 71100 Foggia, Italy;
                [9] iDepartament de Prehistòria Edifici B, Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona , 08193 Barcelona, Spain;
                [10] jDepartment of History and Ethnology, Democritus University of Thrace , Komotini 694100, Greece
                Author notes
                2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: melanie.salque@ 123456bristol.ac.uk or gillis@ 123456mnhn.fr .

                Edited by Patricia L. Crown, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, and approved October 6, 2016 (received for review June 10, 2016)

                Author contributions: C.D.S., R.E.G., M.R.-S., O.E.C., J.-D.V., and R.P.E. designed research; R.E.G. performed the statistical archaeozoological analyses; C.D.S. and M.R.-S. performed the lipid residue analyses; C.D.S. and R.E.G. performed statistical analyses of the dataset; L.C.N., J.G., C.M., I.M.M., M.S.S., D.U.-K., and H.L.W. directed sampling of archaeological material, directed excavations, and helped with the archaeozoological studies or carried out lipid residue analyses; and C.D.S., R.E.G., M.R.-S., O.E.C., J.-D.V., and R.P.E. wrote the paper.

                1C.D.S., R.E.G., and M.R.-S. contributed equally to this work.

                3Present address: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, United Kingdom.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-0639
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-6340
                Article
                PMC5137723 PMC5137723 5137723 201607810
                10.1073/pnas.1607810113
                5137723
                27849595
                0bcd567a-baa7-4ddd-a365-aec29af19c41
                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) 501100000270
                Award ID: NE/G52421X/1
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) 501100000270
                Award ID: R8/H10/63
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme (EC Seventh Framework Programme) 501100004963
                Award ID: FP7-ITN-215362-2
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme (EC Seventh Framework Programme) 501100004963
                Award ID: FP7-IDEAS-ERC/324202
                Funded by: Leverhulme Trust 501100000275
                Award ID: F/00182/T
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme (EC Seventh Framework Programme) 501100004963
                Award ID: FP7-PEOPLE-2007-2-2-ERG/201751
                Categories
                Physical Sciences
                Chemistry
                Biological Sciences
                Anthropology

                archaeology,Neolithic,lipid residue analyses,archaeozoology,milk

                Comments

                Comment on this article