1,153
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    8
    shares

      Studying business & IT? Drive your professional career forwards with BCS books - for a 20% discount click here: shop.bcs.org

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      Case Study of Data Mining Mutual Engagement

      Published
      proceedings-article
      Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI)
      Human Computer Interaction Conference
      4 - 6 July 2018
      Creativity, Creativity Support Tools, Mutual Engagement, Data Mining, Evaluation, Interaction Corpus
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            This paper presents a case study of using conventional Data Mining techniques to identify clusters of creative contributions made by users in a collaborative music making system. Results of the clustering suggest that when people mutually engage with each other they tend to converge on similar creative contributions, whereas smaller clusters may indicate higher quality contributions. We also show how we used Data Mining to discriminate between kinds of creative contributions including: complex melodic structures, simple melodic structures, musical motifs, and rhythmical contributions. Our use of Data Mining does not require direct interaction with users and so it may be useful in real-world study contexts.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            July 2018
            July 2018
            : 1-6
            Affiliations
            [0001]Queen Mary University of London

            London, E1 4NS. UK
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.98
            8271dfe6-3e2c-4c99-b576-75abd62a1a77
            © Bryan-Kinns. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of British HCI 2018. Belfast, UK.

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference
            HCI
            32
            Belfast, UK
            4 - 6 July 2018
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Human Computer Interaction Conference
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.98
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Creativity,Creativity Support Tools,Mutual Engagement,Data Mining,Evaluation,Interaction Corpus

            References

            1. (eds.). 2017 A NIME Reader: Fifteen Years of New Interfaces for Musical Expression Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland. ISBN 9783319472133

            2. , and 2015 What does “Evaluation” mean for the NIME community? In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression Baton Rouge, LA, USA May 31-June 3 2015.

            3. , and 2013 Performance-Led Research in the Wild ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 20 3, Article 14 (July 2013), 22 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502

            4. 2014 Finding waldo: Learning about users from their interactions IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20(12):1663–1672.

            5. 2009 Identifying Mutual Engagement Behaviour & Information Technology. DOI: 10.1080/01449290903377103

            6. Nick Bryan-Kinns 2013 Mutual Engagement and Collocation with Shared Representations International Journal of Human Computer Studies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.02.004

            7. Nick Bryan-Kinns 2014 Mutual Engagement in Digitally Mediated Public Art. In Interactive Experience in the Digital Age , & (Eds.), Springer.

            8. 2018 Mutual Engagement Interaction Corpus. Published May 2018 at http://c4dm.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/rdr/handle/123456789/43

            9. , and 2015 Got Many Labels?: Deriving Topic Labels from Multiple Sources for Social Media Posts using Crowdsourcing and Ensemble Learning. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA 397-406. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2745401.

            10. 2014 Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 21 4, Article 21 (June 2014), 25 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2617588.

            11. , and 2000 The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA 161-168. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/332040.332423

            12. 2002 Pattern Discovery Techniques for Music Audio In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), 2002.

            13. , and 2016 Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA 196-207. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856795

            14. 2002 Separating the swarm: categorization methods for user sessions on the web In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA 243-250. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/503376.503420

            15. 1990 Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

            16. , and 2014 Using metrics of curation to evaluate information-based ideation ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21 3, Article 14 (June 2014), 48 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2591677

            17. 1982 Least Squares Quantization in PCM IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 28 129–137.

            18. MATLAB 2017. Retrieved August 2017 from http://uk.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html

            19. 2006 Living Laboratories: Making and Curating Interactive Art In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Art gallery (SIGGRAPH '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 160. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1178977.1179120

            20. 2011 Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058452

            21. , and 2012 A platform for large-scale machine learning on web design In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA 1697-1702. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223695

            22. , and 2011 Sonic interaction design. In , and (Eds), The Sonification Handbook, Chapter 5, 87–110 Logos Publishing House Berlin.

            23. 2000 Analysing participation in collaborative design environments Design Studies 21(2), 119-144 Elsevier, ISSN 0142-694X

            24. 2007 Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation Communications of the ACM, 50(12):20–32.

            25. , and 2009 Social influence analysis in large-scale networks In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD '09) ACM, New York, NY, USA 807-816. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557108

            26. , and 2016 Unsupervised Clickstream Clustering for User Behavior Analysis In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16) ACM, New York, NY, USA 225-236. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858107

            Comments

            Comment on this article