25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENTS IN EYES WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A comprehensive literature search suggests that anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is effective in treating eyes with pigment epithelial detachment due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This therapy should focus primarily on vision gains because there is no apparent correlation between anatomical and functional improvement in most eyes with pigment epithelial detachment and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          This review aimed to determine the optimal management of retinal pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) based on review of available evidence in the literature.

          Methods:

          A comprehensive literature review evaluates previous retrospective and prospective studies that assessed the treatment of PEDs in nAMD.

          Results:

          Studies illustrated that anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy can be effective in eyes with PED secondary to nAMD. Similar visual outcomes are associated with different anti-VEGF treatments. Higher anti-VEGF doses may improve anatomical response, without correlation with vision improvement. Fibrovascular PEDs may be difficult to treat, but even these eyes can gain vision with anti-VEGF therapy. A retinal pigment epithelial tear may develop in 15% to 20% of eyes with PEDs after anti-VEGF therapy, especially in PEDs greater than 500 µm to 600 µm in height; however, vision may stabilize with continued therapy. Atrophy may complicate eyes with PED and nAMD after anti-VEGF therapy, especially in association with complete PED resolution.

          Conclusion:

          Available literature suggests that anti-VEGF therapy is safe and efficacious for PED and nAMD. Treatment should focus on vision gains rather than PED resolution because there is no apparent correlation between anatomical and functional improvement in most eyes with PED and nAMD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

          Clinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, bevacizumab is used off-label to treat AMD, despite the absence of similar supporting data. In a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 1208 patients with neovascular AMD to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly schedule or as needed with monthly evaluation. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity at 1 year, with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters on the eye chart. Bevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly, with 8.0 and 8.5 letters gained, respectively. Bevacizumab administered as needed was equivalent to ranibizumab as needed, with 5.9 and 6.8 letters gained, respectively. Ranibizumab as needed was equivalent to monthly ranibizumab, although the comparison between bevacizumab as needed and monthly bevacizumab was inconclusive. The mean decrease in central retinal thickness was greater in the ranibizumab-monthly group (196 μm) than in the other groups (152 to 168 μm, P=0.03 by analysis of variance). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar for patients receiving either bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P>0.20). The proportion of patients with serious systemic adverse events (primarily hospitalizations) was higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (24.1% vs. 19.0%; risk ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.66), with excess events broadly distributed in disease categories not identified in previous studies as areas of concern. At 1 year, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity when administered according to the same schedule. Ranibizumab given as needed with monthly evaluation had effects on vision that were equivalent to those of ranibizumab administered monthly. Differences in rates of serious adverse events require further study. (Funded by the National Eye Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00593450.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

            To evaluate the 24-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly or as needed (pro re nata [PRN]) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morphology and Visual Acuity in Aflibercept and Ranibizumab Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the VIEW Trials

              To compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab on the exudative activity of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to correlate morphologic findings with visual acuity (VA) outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Retina
                Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
                retina
                Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
                Retina
                0275-004X
                1539-2864
                November 2018
                24 April 2018
                : 38
                : 11
                : 2103-2117
                Affiliations
                [* ]Sierra Eye Associates, Reno, Nevada;
                []Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida, Tampa, Florida;
                []Organizacion Medica de Investigacion, Buenos Aires, Argentina;
                [§ ]Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California;
                []Retinal Disorders and Ophthalmic Genetics Division, Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;
                []Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, California; and
                [** ]Department of Ophthalmology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
                Author notes
                Reprint requests: Arshad M. Khanani, MD, MA, Sierra Eye Associates, 950 Ryland Street, Reno, Nevada 89502; e-mail: Arshad.khanani@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                Retina-217-2615 00001
                10.1097/IAE.0000000000002195
                6221406
                29697591
                f800af48-77c3-41d1-9f25-60d5c996565b
                Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                age-related macular degeneration,anti–vascular endothelial growth factor,neovascularization,pigment epithelial detachment,retinal pigment epithelium,retinal pigment epithelial tear,visual acuity

                Comments

                Comment on this article