14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Porous Tantalum Implant in Treating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Still a Viable Option?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survivorship and risk factors for radiographic progression and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after porous tantalum implant surgery in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The study comprised 90 ONFH patients (104 consecutive hips) who were treated with a porous tantalum implant combined with bone grafting between June 2008 and December 2013. The patients were 19–61 years of age (mean age, 38 years). The mean follow-up was 42 months. The outcome measures included Harris hip score (HHS), radiographic outcome measures, and survivorship analysis with conversion to THA as the endpoint. The mean postoperative HHS was significantly lower than the mean preoperative HHS (P < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that age and Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage were independent risk factors for conversion to THA, while age, China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) type, and ARCO stage were independent risk factors for radiological progression. Ultimately, only 52.9% hips survived. Porous tantalum implant surgery combined with bone grafting is not a viable option for treating ONFH, especially in patients >35 years of age with preoperative ARCO stage III and CJFH type L3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: ten years later.

          The etiology of osteonecrosis of the hip may have a genetic basis. The interaction between certain risk factors and a genetic predisposition may determine whether this disease will develop in a particular individual. The rationale for use of joint-sparing procedures in the treatment of this disease is based on radiographic measurements and findings with other imaging modalities. Early diagnosis and intervention prior to collapse of the femoral head is key to a successful outcome of joint-preserving procedures. The results of joint-preserving procedures are less satisfactory than the results of total hip arthroplasty for femoral heads that have already collapsed. New pharmacological measures as well as the use of growth and differentiation factors for the prevention and treatment of this disease may eventually alter our treatment approach, but it is necessary to await results of clinical research with long-term follow-up of these patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip.

            A complete review of the literature disclosed that there were 42 reports of 2025 hips treated by either core decompression (1206 hips) or nonoperative management (819 hips), excluding electrical stimulation, for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The peer-reviewed published reports included general surveys, prospective studies, and multicenter studies, but excluded case reports. Satisfactory clinical results were reported in 63.5% of hips in 24 studies of core decompression and in 22.7% of hips in 21 studies of nonoperative management. When looking at only precollapse hips, there were 71% versus 34.5% good results, respectively. Recalculation excluding reports by the 4 centers that do the most core decompressions (and report the best results) showed a clinical success rate for core decompression of 53% versus 22.7% for the nonoperatively treated group. Investigators of multiple studies have reported that nonoperative management leads to extremely poor results. Core decompression has been reported to have a notable effect on the natural history and clinical progression in early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. In view of the limitations of this data, further clarification of this effect only can be obtained by large prospective randomized studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Management of femoral head osteonecrosis: Current concepts

              Osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) is a disabling condition of young individuals with ill-defined etiology and pathogenesis. Remains untreated, about 70-80% of the patients progress to secondary hip arthritis. Both operative and nonoperative treatments have been described with variable success rate. Early diagnosis and treatment is the key for success in preserving the hip joint. Once femoral head collapses (>2 mm) or if there is secondary degeneration, hip conservation procedures become ineffective and arthroplasty remains the only better option. We reviewed 157 studies that evaluate different treatment modalities of ONFH and then a final consensus on treatment was made.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                21 June 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 28227
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine , 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029 China
                [2 ]Center for Osteonecrosis and Joint Preserving & Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital , 2 Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029 China
                Author notes
                Article
                srep28227
                10.1038/srep28227
                4915004
                27324659
                0013e72b-230a-47f5-b8fa-77e553880643
                Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 21 January 2016
                : 01 June 2016
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article