1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Predation risk drives the expression of mobbing across bird species

      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4
      Behavioral Ecology
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds.

          Estimates of the incidence of major classes of parental care by birds are drawn from classical studies that preceded both the publication of a massive secondary literature and the revolution driven by molecular approaches to avian phylogeny. Here, I review this literature in the light of new phylogenetic hypotheses and estimate the prevalence of six distinct modes of care: use of geothermal heat to incubate eggs, brood parasitism, male only care, female only care, biparental care and cooperative breeding. Female only care and cooperative breeding are more common than has previously been recognized, occurring in 8 and 9% of species, respectively. Biparental care by a pair-bonded male and female is the most common pattern of care but at 81% of species, the pattern is less common than once believed. I identify several problems with existing hypotheses for the evolution of parental care and highlight a number of poorly understood contrasts which, once resolved, should help elucidate avian social evolution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls.

            Many animals recognize the alarm calls produced by other species, but the amount of information they glean from these eavesdropped signals is unknown. We previously showed that black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) have a sophisticated alarm call system in which they encode complex information about the size and risk of potential predators in variations of a single type of mobbing alarm call. Here we show experimentally that red-breasted nuthatches (Sitta canadensis) respond appropriately to subtle variations of these heterospecific "chick-a-dee" alarm calls, thereby evidencing that they have gained important information about potential predators in their environment. This study demonstrates a previously unsuspected level of discrimination in intertaxon eavesdropping.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: one function of mobbing.

              There are at least ten suggested hypotheses for the function of mobbing predators by fish, birds, and mammals. Experiments with captive European black-birds support one of these-the "cultural transmission hypothesis." Perceiving a mobbing conspecific together with a novel, harmless bird induced blackbirds to mob the innocuous object. The mobbing response persisted during subsequent presentations of the novel bird alone, which was more effectively conditioned than an artificial control object. Enemy recognition could be culturally transmitted along a chain of at least six individuals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Behavioral Ecology
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1045-2249
                1465-7279
                November 2017
                November 13 2017
                September 09 2017
                November 2017
                November 13 2017
                September 09 2017
                : 28
                : 6
                : 1517-1523
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
                [2 ] Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Campus Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, R. Diogo de Vasconcelos, 122, Pilar, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais Brazil, 35400-000
                [3 ] Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Pesquisas Ambientais, Campus Ouro Preto, Rua Pandiá Calógeras, 898 - Bauxita, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil,35400-000
                [4 ] Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30–387 Krakow, Poland
                Article
                10.1093/beheco/arx111
                00800b88-f417-44fa-83d7-5144ec40492f
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article