30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Virtual Reality Intervention for Patients With Neck Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Neck pain is a prevalent condition that causes an enormous health care burden due to the lack of efficient therapies. As a promising technology, virtual reality (VR) has shown advantages in orthopedic rehabilitation. However, there is no meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of VR in neck pain management.

          Objective

          This study aims to review original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of VR for neck pain and to provide evidence for the clinical application of a new alternative approach for pain management.

          Methods

          A total of 9 electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant articles published from inception to October 2022. RCTs in English or Chinese that investigated VR therapy for participants with neck pain were included. The methodological quality and the evidence level were assessed using the Cochrane Back and Neck Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline, respectively.

          Results

          A total of 8 studies with 382 participants were included for the final analysis. For the pain intensity, the overall pooled effect size was 0.51, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of −0.51 (95% CI −0.91 to −0.11; GRADE: moderate), favoring VR therapy compared with controls. Subgroups analyses revealed that significant differences in pain intensity were found in the multimodal intervention (VR in combination with other therapies) than in other interventions (SMD −0.45, 95% CI −0.78 to −0.13; GRADE: moderate), and better analgesic effects were also observed in patients with chronic neck pain receiving VR intervention (SMD −0.70, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.32; GRADE: moderate) and patients treated in the clinic or research unit (SMD −0.52, 95% CI −0.99 to −0.05; GRADE: moderate) than controls. Regarding other health outcomes, the VR experienced less disability, lower kinesiophobia, and greater kinematic function (cervical range of motion, mean and peak velocity). Nevertheless, the follow-up effects of VR therapy on pain intensity and disability were not found.

          Conclusions

          Existing moderate evidence support VR as a beneficial nonpharmacological approach to improve pain intensity in patients with neck pain, with advantages to multimodal intervention, people with chronic neck pain, and clinic or research unit–based VR therapy. However, the limited quantity and high heterogeneity of the articles limit our findings.

          Trial Registration

          PROSPERO CRD42020188635; https://tinyurl.com/2839jh8w

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

          David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                2023
                3 April 2023
                : 25
                : e38256
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China
                [2 ] Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine Nanning China
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Qiang Gao gaoqiang_hxkf@ 123456163.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2465-7464
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-9133
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6086-3295
                https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2956-4402
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1475-4511
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-0390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3886-1650
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3631-3322
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-749X
                Article
                v25i1e38256
                10.2196/38256
                10131665
                37010891
                0144824c-246d-4f09-8c3c-0ecb9b52be43
                ©Qifan Guo, LIMing Zhang, Chenfan Gui, Guanghui Chen, Yi Chen, Huixin Tan, Wei Su, Ruishi Zhang, Qiang Gao. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 03.04.2023.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 25 March 2022
                : 5 May 2022
                : 31 May 2022
                : 27 February 2023
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Medicine
                meta-analysis,virtual reality,neck pain,disability,systematic review
                Medicine
                meta-analysis, virtual reality, neck pain, disability, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article