5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Venting during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest contribute pre-dominantly to mortality in acute cardiovascular care. Here, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as an established therapeutic option for patients suffering from these life-threatening entities. VA-ECMO provides temporary circulatory support until causative treatments are effective and enables recovery or serves as a bridging strategy to surgical ventricular assist devices, heart transplantation or decision-making. However, in-hospital mortality rate in this treatment population is still around 60%. In the recently published ARREST trial, VA-ECMO treatment lowered mortality rate in patients with ongoing cardiac arrest due to therapy refractory ventricular fibrillation compared to standard advanced cardiac life support in selected patients. Whether VA-ECMO can reduce mortality compared to standard of care in cardiogenic shock has to be evaluated in the ongoing prospective randomized studies EURO-SHOCK (NCT03813134) and ECLS-SHOCK (NCT03637205). As an innate drawback of VA-ECMO treatment, the retrograde aortic flow could lead to an elevation of left ventricular (LV) afterload, increase in LV filling pressure, mitral regurgitation, and elevated left atrial pressure. This may compromise myocardial function and recovery, pulmonary hemodynamics—possibly with concomitant pulmonary congestion and even lung failure—and contribute to poor outcomes in a relevant proportion of treated patients. To overcome these detrimental effects, a multitude of venting strategies are currently engaged for both preventive and emergent unloading. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and structured synopsis of existing venting modalities and their specific hemodynamic characteristics. We discuss in detail the available data on outcome categories and complication rates related to the respective venting option.

          Graphical abstract

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

          In current international guidelines, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is considered to be a class I treatment for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, evidence is based mainly on registry data, and there is a paucity of randomized clinical trials. In this randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction to intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP group, 301 patients) or no intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (control group, 299 patients). All patients were expected to undergo early revascularization (by means of percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery) and to receive the best available medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Safety assessments included major bleeding, peripheral ischemic complications, sepsis, and stroke. A total of 300 patients in the IABP group and 298 in the control group were included in the analysis of the primary end point. At 30 days, 119 patients in the IABP group (39.7%) and 123 patients in the control group (41.3%) had died (relative risk with IABP, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.17; P=0.69). There were no significant differences in secondary end points or in process-of-care measures, including the time to hemodynamic stabilization, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, serum lactate levels, the dose and duration of catecholamine therapy, and renal function. The IABP group and the control group did not differ significantly with respect to the rates of major bleeding (3.3% and 4.4%, respectively; P=0.51), peripheral ischemic complications (4.3% and 3.4%, P=0.53), sepsis (15.7% and 20.5%, P=0.15), and stroke (0.7% and 1.7%, P=0.28). The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction for whom an early revascularization strategy was planned. (Funded by the German Research Foundation and others; IABP-SHOCK II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00491036.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

            Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hemodynamics of Mechanical Circulatory Support.

              An increasing number of devices can provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to patients with acute hemodynamic compromise and chronic end-stage heart failure. These devices work by different pumping mechanisms, have various flow capacities, are inserted by different techniques, and have different sites from which blood is withdrawn and returned to the body. These factors result in different primary hemodynamic effects and secondary responses of the body. However, these are not generally taken into account when choosing a device for a particular patient or while managing a patient undergoing MCS. In this review, we discuss fundamental principles of cardiac, vascular, and pump mechanics and illustrate how they provide a broad foundation for understanding the complex interactions between the heart, vasculature, and device, and how they may help guide future research to improve patient outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                MartinOrban@gmail.com , Martin.Orban@med.uni-muenchen.de
                Journal
                Clin Res Cardiol
                Clin Res Cardiol
                Clinical Research in Cardiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1861-0684
                1861-0692
                20 August 2022
                20 August 2022
                2023
                : 112
                : 4
                : 464-505
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411095.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0477 2585, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, , Klinikum Der Universität München, ; Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.452396.f, ISNI 0000 0004 5937 5237, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), , Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, ; Munich, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.411095.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0477 2585, Herzchirurgische Klinik Und Poliklinik, , Klinikum Der Universität München, ; Munich, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.13648.38, ISNI 0000 0001 2180 3484, Department of Cardiology, , University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, ; Hamburg, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.452396.f, ISNI 0000 0004 5937 5237, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, ; Hamburg, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.15090.3d, ISNI 0000 0000 8786 803X, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik II, , Universitätsklinikum Bonn, ; Bonn, Germany
                [7 ]GRID grid.9647.c, ISNI 0000 0004 7669 9786, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, , Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, ; Leipzig, Germany
                [8 ]GRID grid.10423.34, ISNI 0000 0000 9529 9877, Klinik Für Kardiologie Und Angiologie, , Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, ; Hannover, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-5672
                Article
                2069
                10.1007/s00392-022-02069-0
                10050067
                35986750
                0175a56c-15a9-479e-8cf3-dfdf9b5b4245
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 March 2022
                : 12 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Universitätsklinik München (6933)
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2023

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                unloading,venting,decompression,va-ecmo,percutaneous microaxial pump,impella,iabp,ecmella,cardiogenic shock

                Comments

                Comment on this article