3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Review: Comparative methane production in mammalian herbivores.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Methane (CH4) production is a ubiquitous, apparently unavoidable side effect of fermentative fibre digestion by symbiotic microbiota in mammalian herbivores. Here, a data compilation is presented of in vivo CH4 measurements in individuals of 37 mammalian herbivore species fed forage-only diets, from the literature and from hitherto unpublished measurements. In contrast to previous claims, absolute CH4 emissions scaled linearly to DM intake, and CH4 yields (per DM or gross energy intake) did not vary significantly with body mass. CH4 physiology hence cannot be construed to represent an intrinsic ruminant or herbivore body size limitation. The dataset does not support traditional dichotomies of CH4 emission intensity between ruminants and nonruminants, or between foregut and hindgut fermenters. Several rodent hindgut fermenters and nonruminant foregut fermenters emit CH4 of a magnitude as high as ruminants of similar size, intake level, digesta retention or gut capacity. By contrast, equids, macropods (kangaroos) and rabbits produce few CH4 and have low CH4 : CO2 ratios for their size, intake level, digesta retention or gut capacity, ruling out these factors as explanation for interspecific variation. These findings lead to the conclusion that still unidentified host-specific factors other than digesta retention characteristics, or the presence of rumination or a foregut, influence CH4 production. Measurements of CH4 yield per digested fibre indicate that the amount of CH4 produced during fibre digestion varies not only across but also within species, possibly pointing towards variation in microbiota functionality. Recent findings on the genetic control of microbiome composition, including methanogens, raise the question about the benefits methanogens provide for many (but apparently not to the same extent for all) species, which possibly prevented the evolution of the hosting of low-methanogenic microbiota across mammals.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Animal
          Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
          Cambridge University Press (CUP)
          1751-732X
          1751-7311
          Mar 2020
          : 14
          : S1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
          [2 ] ETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
          [3 ] Leibniz Instiute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
          [4 ] Zoological Garden, 06114 Halle, Germany.
          [5 ] Naturschutz-Tierpark, 02826 Görlitz, Germany.
          [6 ] School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of North South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
          Article
          S1751731119003161
          10.1017/S1751731119003161
          32024568
          02e93ec1-dfa2-4d1e-86ce-f9fdba886087
          History

          methanogens,mean retention time,hindgut fermentation,foregut fermentation,digesta washing

          Comments

          Comment on this article