6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative study of the determinants of adherence to NICE falls guideline in managing older fallers attending an emergency department

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 Falls guideline was developed to improve the assessment and management of falls and prevention of future falls. However, adherence to the guideline can be poor. As emergency departments (EDs) are usually consulted by older adults (aged 65 and over) who experience a fall, they provide a setting in which assessments can be conducted or referrals made to more appropriate settings.

          The objective of this study was to investigate how falls are managed in EDs, reasons why guideline recommendations are not always followed, and what happens instead.

          Methods

          The study involved two EDs. We undertook 27 episodes of observation of healthcare professional interactions with patients aged 65 or over presenting with a fall, supported by review of the clinical records of these interactions, and subsequently, 30 interviews with healthcare professionals. The qualitative analysis used the framework approach.

          Results

          Various barriers and enablers (i.e. determinants of practice) influenced adherence at both EDs, including the following: support from senior staff; education; cross-boundary care; definition of falls; communication; organisational factors; and staffing.

          Conclusions

          A variety of factors influence adherence to the Falls guideline within an ED, and it may be difficult to address all of them simultaneously. Simple interventions such as education and pro-formas are unlikely to have substantial effects alone. However, taking advantage of the influence of senior staff on juniors could enhance adherence. In addition, collaborative care with other NHS services offers a potential approach for emergency practitioners to play a part in managing and preventing falls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book Chapter: not found

          Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial.

              Falls in elderly people are a common presenting complaint to accident and emergency departments. Current practice commonly focuses on the injury, with little systematic assessment of the underlying cause, functional consequences, and possibilities for future prevention. We undertook a randomised controlled study to assess the benefit of a structured inderdisciplinary assessment of people who have fallen in terms of further falls. Eligible patients were aged 65 years and older, lived in the community, and presented to an accident and emergency department with a fall. Patients assigned to the intervention group (n=184) underwent a detailed medical and occupational-therapy assessment with referral to relevant services if indicated; those assigned to the control group (n=213) received usual care only. The analyses were by intention to treat. Follow-up data were collected every 4 months for 1 year. At 12-month follow-up, 77% of both groups remained in the study. The total reported number of falls during this period was 183 in the intervention group compared with 510 in the control group (p=0.0002). The risk of falling was significantly reduced in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.39 [95% CI 0.23-0.66]) as was the risk of recurrent falls (0.33 [0.16-0.68]). In addition, the odds of admission to hospital were lower in the intervention group (0.61 [0.35-1.05]) whereas the decline in Barthel score with time was greater in the control group (p<0.00001). The study shows that an interdisciplinary approach to this high-risk population can significantly decrease the risk of further falls and limit functional impairment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Helen.McEwan@bcu.ac.uk
                rb14@le.ac.uk
                na144@le.ac.uk
                jb234@le.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Emerg Med
                Int J Emerg Med
                International Journal of Emergency Medicine
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1865-1372
                1865-1380
                18 July 2018
                18 July 2018
                2018
                : 11
                : 33
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2180 2449, GRID grid.19822.30, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, , Birmingham City University, ; C303 Curzon Building, 4 Cardigan Street, Birmingham, B4 7BD England
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8411, GRID grid.9918.9, Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Medicine, , University of Leicester, ; Leicester, England
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0435 9078, GRID grid.269014.8, Department of Emergency Medicine, , University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, ; Leicester, England
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7551-3212
                Article
                192
                10.1186/s12245-018-0192-9
                6051952
                30022394
                036da633-48dc-4292-9667-417aa8e9cdd3
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 29 November 2017
                : 25 June 2018
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                accidental falls,emergency care systems,emergency departments,guidelines,geriatrics,qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article