Hipertensión pulmonar primaria

Not all the risk factors for primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) are known. Appetite suppressants, including fenfluramine derivatives, are strongly suspected aetiological agents. In a 5 year retrospective study fenfluramine use was evaluated among patients referred to a medical centre specialising in the management of PPH. Fifteen (20%) of 73 patients with PPH had used fenfluramine: all of them were women and in 10 (67%) there was a close temporal relation between fenfluramine use and the development of exertional dyspnoea. Initial right heart catheterisation in the 15 women showed severe resting pulmonary hypertension (mean (SD)) with pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) 57 (9) mm Hg, cardiac index 2.1 (0.5) l/min/m2, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 29 (10) U/m2. Short-term epoprostenol infusion produced a significant vasodilator response in 10 patients (mean fall in PVR 24 (15%) compared with control values). Three fenfluramine users with PPH showed spontaneous clinical and haemodynamic improvement 3, 6 and 12 months after drug withdrawal but there was no significant difference in overall survival (transplant recipients excluded) between fenfluramine users and controls. Histological examination of lung tissue from five women who had used fenfluramine and 22 controls, with PPH showed features typical of advanced plexogenic pulmonary arteriopathy in all. These results do not accord with earlier reports that PPH associated with fenfluramine is less severe and has a better outcome. Fenfluramine may be one aetiological agent that can precipitate or hasten the development of PPH. The results of a European case-control study should give new insights into risk factors for PPH and the cause and effect relation with fenfluramine.

To evaluate pulmonary vasoreactivity in children and young adults with primary pulmonary hypertension, we performed cardiac catheterizations on nine patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (nine months to 23 years old) and made hemodynamic measurements: before and after infusing prostacyclin, and before and after administering sublingual nifedipine. Based upon the response to prostacyclin, patients were divided into responders and nonresponders using the following criteria: 20 percent or greater decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure; an increase in cardiac index; and no change, or a decrease in the pulmonary vascular resistance to systemic vascular resistance ratio. By these criteria, five of the nine patients had a reactive pulmonary vascular bed and responded to prostacyclin administration. In addition, they all responded to nifedipine. The remaining four did not respond to either drug. There was a close correlation (r = 0.85, p less than 0.01) between the magnitude of the pulmonary vasodilator response to treatment with prostacyclin and nifedipine. There was also a significant inverse correlation between the age of the patient at the time of the study and the pulmonary vasodilator response to administration of prostacyclin (r = 0.91, p less than 0.01) and nifedipine (r = 0.82, p less than 0.01); ie, both drugs produced a greater fall in pulmonary arterial pressure in younger patients with primary pulmonary hypertension than in older ones.