3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative maxillary bone-defect healing by calcium-sulphate or deproteinized bovine bone particles and extra cellular matrix membranes in a guided bone regeneration setting: an experimental study in rabbits.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to histologically compare the dynamics of bone healing response between calcium sulphate (CaS) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles in guided bone regeneration utilizing an extracellular matrix membrane (ECM) as barrier.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Oral Implants Res
          Clinical oral implants research
          Wiley
          1600-0501
          0905-7161
          May 2015
          : 26
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Biomaterials, BIOMATCELL VINN Excellence Center, Institute for Surgical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; The Brånemark Clinic, Institute of Odontology, Public Dental Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
          Article
          10.1111/clr.12425
          24954120
          03c1ef85-104f-41b2-b202-af2d7a601512
          © 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
          History

          GBR,bone defect,bone substitutes,calcium sulphate,experimental study,guided bone regeneration,histology,maxilla,membranes

          Comments

          Comment on this article