Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness Between Infrared Thermography and Electrophysiology Tests in Spinal Intradural Extramedullary Schwannoma

Abstract

Objective

Subjective pain is experienced differently by each patient; therefore, modalities that can objectify subjective symptoms are useful. Electrophysiology tests and infrared (IR) thermography can present subjective symptoms in an objective manner. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of electrophysiology tests and IR thermography in patients with intradural extramedullary (IDEM) schwannoma and statistically analyze the results to verify the positive relationship between the subjective neurologic symptoms and test results.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 23 patients, pathologically confirmed to have IDEM spinal schwannoma after surgery between January 2012 and December 2020. All patients were preoperatively examined using IR thermography and an electrophysiology test. IR thermography was conducted again week after operation. The IR thermography results were classified as either positive or negative.

Results

Radiculopathy symptoms were reported in 16 cases and myelopathy in 7 cases. Among the radiculopathy patients, 9 out of 16 (56.2%) showed positive electrophysiology test results. Among the myelopathy patients, 2 out of 7 (28.5%) showed positive electrophysiology test results. In the radiculopathy group, 15 out of 16 (93.7%) patients showed positive IR thermography results. In the myelopathy group, 2 out of 7 (28.5%) patients showed positive IR thermography results. The correlation between the IR thermography and electrophysiology test was analyzed. In the radiculopathy group, positive electrophysiology test result was obtained in 8 out of 15 (53.5%) patients with positive IR thermography result.

Conclusion

In patients with IDEM schwannoma presenting radiculopathy symptoms, IR thermography is a complementary tool to objectify the neurological symptoms.