0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceived Barriers of Using Modern Family Planning Methods among Women in Jordan: A Qualitative Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          A BSTRACT

          Background:

          Some cultural and social factors may discourage the use of modern family planning (MFP) methods. The purpose of this study was to better understand the barriers and social norms that might affect women’s ability to take optimal advantage of the free family planning services offered by the Jordanian Ministry of Health (MOH).

          Methods:

          Using a qualitative descriptive design, 7 focus group discussions were conducted from January to February 2018, with a purposive sample of 52 married women. Each group consisted of 6-12 participants. Ethical approvals were obtained. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

          Results:

          Data analysis revealed three main themes and four subthemes. The first theme ‘conforming to social and cultural norms’ included the following subthemes: ‘to conform to family and social pressure to bear children’ and ‘to prioritize having male children’. The second theme ‘unmet needs in expected family planning counselling’ included the following subthemes: ‘need for consistency across providers in family planning counselling’, and ‘need for follow-up counselling’. The third theme was the ‘undesirable side-effects’ of the MFP methods, which included both the ‘experienced’ and the ‘anticipated’ side effects.

          Conclusion:

          This study identified a number of women’s perceived barriers to using MFP methods. These included conforming to the social pressure, inconsistency of the counselling process, and undesirable side effects. Their perspectives should be carefully addressed in any family planning program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?

          Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research

            A qualitative description design is particularly relevant where information is required directly from those experiencing the phenomenon under investigation and where time and resources are limited. Nurses and midwives often have clinical questions suitable to a qualitative approach but little time to develop an exhaustive comprehension of qualitative methodological approaches. Qualitative description research is sometimes considered a less sophisticated approach for epistemological reasons. Another challenge when considering qualitative description design is differentiating qualitative description from other qualitative approaches. This article provides a systematic and robust journey through the philosophical, ontological, and epistemological perspectives, which evidences the purpose of qualitative description research. Methods and rigor issues underpinning qualitative description research are also appraised to provide the researcher with a systematic approach to conduct research utilizing this approach. The key attributes and value of qualitative description research in the health care professions will be highlighted with the aim of extending its usage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery
                Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery
                International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery
                Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Iran )
                2322-2476
                2322-4835
                October 2021
                : 9
                : 4
                : 278-288
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Child Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
                [2 ] Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
                [3 ] Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
                [4 ] Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
                [5 ] Ray Marshall Center for the Study of Human Resources, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
                [6 ] Commonwealth Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Senior Project Director, University of Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Khulood K. Shattnawi, RN, PhD; Department of Child Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box (3030), Irbid- 22110 Jordan Tel: +96 227201000 Ext. 23606/ 23714; Fax: +96 227201065; Email: khuloods@ 123456just.edu.jo
                Article
                IJCBNM-9-4
                10.30476/ijcbnm.2021.88675.1531
                8479286
                34604397
                046b67bc-b546-4ba5-abe9-7ba4d081ce1d
                Copyright: © International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 April 2021
                : 7 April 2021
                : 13 November 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                barriers, family planning methods, jordan, qualitative study, women

                Comments

                Comment on this article