Perampanel in routine clinical use in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: The 12-month GENERAL study

To assess efficacy and safety of once-daily 8 or 12 mg perampanel, a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, when added to concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of drug-resistant partial-onset seizures. This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00699972). Patients (≥12 years, with ongoing seizures despite 1-3 AEDs) were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily perampanel 8 mg, 12 mg, or placebo. Following baseline (6 weeks), patients entered a 19-week double-blind phase: 6-week titration (2 mg/week increments to target dose) followed by a 13-week maintenance period. Percent change in seizure frequency was the primary endpoint; 50% responder rate was the primary endpoint for EU registration. Of 388 patients randomized and treated, 387 provided seizure frequency data. Using this intent-to-treat population over the double-blind phase, the median percent change in seizure frequency was -21.0%, -26.3%, and -34.5% for placebo and perampanel 8 and 12 mg, respectively (p = 0.0261 and p = 0.0158 for 8 and 12 mg vs placebo, respectively). Fifty percent responder rates during the maintenance period were 26.4%, 37.6%, and 36.1%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg; these differences were not statistically significant for 8 mg (p = 0.0760) or 12 mg (p = 0.0914). Sixty-eight (17.5%) patients discontinued, including 40 (10.3%) for adverse events. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, irritability, headache, fall, and ataxia. This trial demonstrated that once-daily, adjunctive perampanel at doses of 8 or 12 mg improved seizure control in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg were safe, and tolerability was acceptable. This study provides Class I evidence that once-daily 8 and 12 mg doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.

Abstract Purpose Real‐world evidence (RWE) includes data from retrospective or prospective observational studies and observational registries and provides insights beyond those addressed by randomized controlled trials. RWE studies aim to improve health care decision making. Methods The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) created a task force to make recommendations regarding good procedural practices that would enhance decision makers' confidence in evidence derived from RWD studies. Peer review by ISPOR/ISPE members and task force participants provided a consensus‐building iterative process for the topics and framing of recommendations. Results The ISPOR/ISPE Task Force recommendations cover seven topics such as study registration, replicability, and stakeholder involvement in RWE studies. These recommendations, in concert with earlier recommendations about study methodology, provide a trustworthy foundation for the expanded use of RWE in health care decision making. Conclusion The focus of these recommendations is good procedural practices for studies that test a specific hypothesis in a specific population. We recognize that some of the recommendations in this report may not be widely adopted without appropriate incentives from decision makers, journal editors, and other key stakeholders.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day added to 1-3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. During this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with persisting seizures on 1-3 AEDs were randomized to perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day or placebo following a 6-week baseline phase. Perampanel was titrated weekly by 2 mg/day and maintained at the dose achieved for 13 weeks. Primary endpoints were median percent change in seizure frequency and 50% responder rate. Analysis of covariance was performed on all treated patients with any seizure data (recorded in daily diaries) in the double-blind phase. A total of 706 patients were randomized and received trial medication; 623 completed the trial. Median percent change in seizure frequency-the primary efficacy endpoint-was -10.7%, -13.6%, -23.3%, and -30.8% for placebo, perampanel 2, 4, and 8 mg/day, respectively. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0026) and 8 mg/day (p < 0.0001). The corresponding 50% responder rates were 17.9%, 20.6%, 28.5%, and 34.9%. The difference from placebo was statistically significant for perampanel 4 mg/day (p = 0.0132) and 8 mg/day (p = 0.0003). An apparent dose response was suggested for dizziness, which was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event. This trial demonstrated that adjunctive perampanel effectively reduced seizure frequency and possessed a favorable tolerability profile in patients ≥12 years with partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalization), with a minimum effective dose of 4 mg/day. This study provides Class I evidence that 4 and 8 mg/day doses of adjunctive perampanel are effective and tolerated in reducing partial-onset seizures.