10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identification and RNAi Profile of a Novel Iflavirus Infecting Senegalese Aedes vexans arabiensis Mosquitoes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The inland floodwater mosquito Aedes vexans (Meigen, 1830) is a competent vector of numerous arthropod-borne viruses such as Rift Valley fever virus ( Phenuiviridae) and Zika virus ( Flaviviridae). Aedes vexans spp. have widespread Afrotropical distribution and are common European cosmopolitan mosquitoes. We examined the virome of Ae. vexans arabiensis samples from Barkédji village, Senegal, with small RNA sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and RT-PCR screening. We identified a novel 9494 nt iflavirus ( Picornaviridae) designated here as Aedes vexans iflavirus (AvIFV). Annotation of the AvIFV genome reveals a 2782 amino acid polyprotein with iflavirus protein domain architecture and typical iflavirus 5’ internal ribosomal entry site and 3’ poly-A tail. Aedes vexans iflavirus is most closely related to a partial virus sequence from Venturia canescens (a parasitoid wasp) with 56.77% pairwise amino acid identity. Analysis of AvIFV-derived small RNAs suggests that AvIFV is targeted by the exogenous RNA interference pathway but not the PIWI-interacting RNA response, as ~60% of AvIFV reads corresponded to 21 nt Dicer-2 virus-derived small RNAs and the 24–29 nt AvIFV read population did not exhibit a “ping-pong” signature. The RT-PCR screens of archival and current (circa 2011–2020) Ae. vexans arabiensis laboratory samples and wild-caught mosquitoes from Barkédji suggest that AvIFV is ubiquitous in these mosquitoes. Further, we screened wild-caught European Ae. vexans samples from Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Sweden, all of which tested negative for AvIFV RNA. This report provides insight into the diversity of commensal Aedes viruses and the host RNAi response towards iflaviruses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence and seasonal variations of six bee viruses in Apis mellifera L. and Varroa destructor mite populations in France.

          A survey of six bee viruses on a large geographic scale was undertaken by using seemingly healthy bee colonies and the PCR technique. Samples of adult bees and pupae were collected from 36 apiaries in the spring, summer, and autumn during 2002. Varroa destructor samples were collected at the end of summer following acaricide treatment. In adult bees, during the year deformed wing virus (DWV) was found at least once in 97% of the apiaries, sacbrood virus (SBV) was found in 86% of the apiaries, chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) was found in 28% of the apiaries, acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) was found in 58% of the apiaries, black queen cell virus (BQCV) was found in 86% of the apiaries, and Kashmir bee virus (KBV) was found in 17% of the apiaries. For pupae, the following frequencies were obtained: DWV, 94% of the apiaries; SBV, 80% of the apiaries; CBPV, none of the apiaries; ABPV, 23% of the apiaries; BQCV, 23% of the apiaries; and KBV, 6% of the apiaries. In Varroa samples, the following four viruses were identified: DWV (100% of the apiaries), SBV (45% of the apiaries), ABPV (36% of the apiaries), and KBV (5% of the apiaries). The latter findings support the putative role of mites in transmitting these viruses. Taken together, these data indicate that bee virus infections occur persistently in bee populations despite the lack of clinical signs, suggesting that colony disease outbreaks might result from environmental factors that lead to activation of viral replication in bees.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            NCBI BLAST+ integrated into Galaxy

            Background The NCBI BLAST suite has become ubiquitous in modern molecular biology and is used for small tasks such as checking capillary sequencing results of single PCR products, genome annotation or even larger scale pan-genome analyses. For early adopters of the Galaxy web-based biomedical data analysis platform, integrating BLAST into Galaxy was a natural step for sequence comparison workflows. Findings The command line NCBI BLAST+ tool suite was wrapped for use within Galaxy. Appropriate datatypes were defined as needed. The integration of the BLAST+ tool suite into Galaxy has the goal of making common BLAST tasks easy and advanced tasks possible. Conclusions This project is an informal international collaborative effort, and is deployed and used on Galaxy servers worldwide. Several examples of applications are described here.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An Update on the Potential of North American Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to Transmit West Nile Virus

              ABSTRACT Since first discovered in the New York City area in 1999, West Nile virus (WNV) has become established over much of the continental United States and has been responsible for >10,000 cases of severe disease and 400 human fatalities, as well as thousands of fatal infections in horses. To develop appropriate surveillance and control strategies, the identification of which mosquito species are competent vectors and how various factors influence their ability to transmit this virus must be determined. Therefore, we evaluated numerous mosquito species for their ability to transmit WNV under laboratory conditions. This report contains data for several mosquito species not reported previously, as well as a summary of transmission data compiled from previously reported studies. Mosquitoes were allowed to feed on chickens infected with WNV isolated from a crow that died during the 1999 outbreak in New York City. These mosquitoes were tested approximately 2 wk later to determine infection, dissemination, and transmission rates. All Culex species tested were competent vectors in the laboratory and varied from highly efficient vectors (e.g., Culex tarsalis Coquillett) to moderately efficient ones (e.g., Culex nigripalpus Theobald). Nearly all of the Culex species tested could serve as efficient enzootic or amplifying vectors for WNV. Several container-breeding Aedes and Ochlerotatus species were highly efficient vectors under laboratory conditions, but because of their feeding preferences, would probably not be involved in the maintenance of WNV in nature. However, they would be potential bridge vectors between the avian-Culex cycle and mammalian hosts. In contrast, most of the surface pool-breeding Aedes and Ochlerotatus species tested were relatively inefficient vectors under laboratory conditions and would probably not play a significant role in transmitting WNV in nature. In determining the potential for a mosquito species to become involved in transmitting WNV, it is necessary to consider not only its laboratory vector competence but also its abundance, host-feeding preference, involvement with other viruses with similar transmission cycles, and whether WNV has been isolated from this species under natural conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Viruses
                Viruses
                viruses
                Viruses
                MDPI
                1999-4915
                14 April 2020
                April 2020
                : 12
                : 4
                : 440
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; r.parry@ 123456uq.edu.au (R.P.); s.asgari@ 123456uq.edu.au (S.A.)
                [2 ]Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany; fanny.naccache@ 123456tiho-hannover.de
                [3 ]Research Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
                [4 ]Pole de Zoologie Médicale, Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar BP 220, Senegal; elhadji.ndiaye@ 123456pasteur.sn (E.H.N.); mawlouth.diallo@ 123456pasteur.sn (M.D.)
                [5 ]Pole de Virologie, Unité des Arbovirus et Virus de Fièvres Hémorragiques, Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar BP 220, Senegal; gamou.fall@ 123456pasteur.sn
                [6 ]Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, Department of Virology, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France; castelli.ilaria84@ 123456gmail.com (I.C.); anna-bella.failloux@ 123456pasteur.fr (A.-B.F.)
                [7 ]Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences, Universiät Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg, Germany; luehken@ 123456bnitm.de (R.L.); schnettler@ 123456bnitm.de (E.S.)
                [8 ]Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
                [9 ]Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infection, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK; jolyon.medlock@ 123456phe.gov.uk
                [10 ]Medical Entomology & Zoonoses Ecology, Emergency Response Department Science & Technology, Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK; ben.cull@ 123456phe.gov.uk or
                [11 ]Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology/Zoonosis Science Center, Uppsala University, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden; jenny.hesson@ 123456imbim.uu.se
                [12 ]Laboratory of Parasitology, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro (Padua), Italy; fmontarsi@ 123456izsvenezie.it
                [13 ]MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK; alain.kohl@ 123456glasgow.ac.uk
                [14 ]German Centre for Infection Research, partner site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
                [15 ]The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright GU24 0NF, UK
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [‡]

                Current Address: Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-1952
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-0723
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-839X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6814-5669
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-0820
                Article
                viruses-12-00440
                10.3390/v12040440
                7232509
                32295109
                05428d14-2257-43ba-8975-6b0ca4b72ec3
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 March 2020
                : 11 April 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Microbiology & Virology
                aedes vexans,iflavirus,rnai,virus discovery
                Microbiology & Virology
                aedes vexans, iflavirus, rnai, virus discovery

                Comments

                Comment on this article