31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Facilitation is a guided interactional process that has been popularized in health care. Its popularity arises from its potential to support uptake and application of scientific knowledge that stands to improve clinical and managerial decision-making, practice, and ultimately patient outcomes and organizational performance. While this popular concept has garnered attention in health services research, we know that both the content of facilitation and its impact on knowledge implementation vary. The basis of this variation is poorly understood, and understanding is hampered by a lack of conceptual clarity.

          Discussion

          In this paper, we argue that our understanding of facilitation and its effects is limited in part by a lack of clear theoretical grounding. We propose a theoretical home for facilitation in organizational learning theory. Referring to extant literature on facilitation and drawing on theoretical literature, we discuss the features of facilitation that suggest its role in contributing to learning capacity. We describe how facilitation may contribute to generating knowledge about the application of new scientific knowledge in health-care organizations.

          Summary

          Facilitation’s promise, we suggest, lies in its potential to stimulate higher-order learning in organizations through experimenting with, generating learning about, and sustaining small-scale adaptations to organizational processes and work routines. The varied effectiveness of facilitation observed in the literature is associated with the presence or absence of factors known to influence organizational learning, since facilitation itself appears to act as a learning mechanism. We offer propositions regarding the relationships between facilitation processes and key organizational learning concepts that have the potential to guide future work to further our understanding of the role that facilitation plays in learning and knowledge generation.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Book: not found

          An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change

          This book contains the most sustained and serious attack on mainstream, neoclassical economics in more than forty years. Nelson and Winter focus their critique on the basic question of how firms and industries change overtime. They marshal significant objections to the fundamental neoclassical assumptions of profit maximization and market equilibrium, which they find ineffective in the analysis of technological innovation and the dynamics of competition among firms. To replace these assumptions, they borrow from biology the concept of natural selection to construct a precise and detailed evolutionary theory of business behavior. They grant that films are motivated by profit and engage in search for ways of improving profits, but they do not consider them to be profit maximizing. Likewise, they emphasize the tendency for the more profitable firms to drive the less profitable ones out of business, but they do not focus their analysis on hypothetical states of industry equilibrium. The results of their new paradigm and analytical framework are impressive. Not only have they been able to develop more coherent and powerful models of competitive firm dynamics under conditions of growth and technological change, but their approach is compatible with findings in psychology and other social sciences. Finally, their work has important implications for welfare economics and for government policy toward industry.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN INTRAORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS: EFFECTS OF NETWORK POSITION AND ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON BUSINESS UNIT INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE.

            Vicky Tsai (2001)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                1-416-946-5223 , whit.berta@utoronto.ca
                lisa.cranley@utoronto.ca
                dearjim@msu.edu
                Elizabeth.dogherty@queensu.ca
                jasquires@ohri.ca
                cestabro@ualberta.ca
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                6 October 2015
                6 October 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 141
                Affiliations
                [ ]Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
                [ ]Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [ ]College for Communication Arts & Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan USA
                [ ]St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                [ ]School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
                [ ]Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta Canada
                Article
                323
                10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0
                4596304
                25567289
                05cace36-6ab1-4f66-ba48-59c1df9e48e7
                © Berta et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 April 2015
                : 10 September 2015
                Categories
                Debate
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article