19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the “person” that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Description and Prescription: How Gender Stereotypes Prevent Women's Ascent Up the Organizational Ladder

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Intersectionality and Feminist Politics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Intersectional Invisibility: The Distinctive Advantages and Disadvantages of Multiple Subordinate-Group Identities

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychology of Women Quarterly
                Psychology of Women Quarterly
                SAGE Publications
                0361-6843
                1471-6402
                December 2019
                August 12 2019
                December 2019
                : 43
                : 4
                : 445-456
                Affiliations
                [1 ]William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
                [2 ]School of Social Science and Human Services, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, NJ, USA
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [4 ]Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
                Article
                10.1177/0361684319866430
                06361597-1d0b-4bd1-b5a5-df6a3c42306d
                © 2019

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article