4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trajectories in muscular strength and physical function among men with and without prostate cancer in the health aging and body composition study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To examine and compare changes in strength and physical function from pre- to post-diagnosis among men with prostate cancer (PC, [cases]) and matched non-cancer controls identified from the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study.

          Materials and methods

          We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 2 strength and 3 physical function-based measures among both cases and controls, identified from a large cohort of community living older adults enrolled in the Health ABC study. We plotted trajectories for each measure and compared cases vs. controls from the point of diagnosis onwards using mixed-effects regression models. For cases only, we examined predictors of poor strength or physical function.

          Results

          We identified 117 PC cases and 453 matched non-cancer controls (50% African Americans). At baseline, there were no differences between cases and controls in demographic factors, comorbidities or self-reported physical function; however, cases had slightly better grip strength (44.6 kg vs. 41.0 kg, p<0.01), quadriceps strength (360.5 Nm vs. 338.7 Nm, p = 0.02) and Health ABC physical performance battery scores (2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.01). All men experienced similar declines in strength and physical function over an equivalent amount of time. The loss of quad strength was most notable, with losses of nearly two-thirds of baseline strength over approximately 7 years of follow up.

          Conclusions

          Among both cases and controls, strength and physical function decline with increasing age. The largest declines were seen in lower body strength. Regular assessments should guide lifestyle interventions that can offset age- and treatment-related declines among men with PC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

          L Radloff (1977)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring higher level physical function in well-functioning older adults: expanding familiar approaches in the Health ABC study.

            To evaluate development and progression of functional limitation and retain comparability with established approaches, we raised the measurement ceiling of commonly used self-report and performance-based measures of function. This study evaluated the utility and concurrent validity of these expanded measures. The study population consisted of 3075 black and white men and women aged 70 to 79 years, with no reported mobility limitations or disability, participating in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition, or Health ABC study. Self-report measures were expanded by ascertaining ease of performance and including more demanding levels of some tasks. A single foot stand and narrow walk supplemented an established performance battery. For walking endurance, we developed the Long Distance Corridor Walk (LDCW), which includes distance covered in 2 minutes and the time to walk 400 m. The expanded self-report items identified one half of the men and one third of the women as exceptionally well functioning and 10% to 13% of men and 21% to 36% of women with lower capacity. The supplemented and rescored performance battery discriminated function over the full range. The LDCW further differentiated walking capacity at the high end and also identified a subgroup with limitations. The self-report and performance measures were significantly, but weakly, correlated (0.13-0.35) and were independent predictors of walking endurance. Well-functioning persons in their 70s exhibit a broad range of functional capacity readily ascertained by expanded self-report and performance tests. Significant associations among these measures support their concurrent validity, but generally weak correlations indicate they tap different, but important, dimensions of physical function.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trends in prostate cancer in the United States.

              In the United States, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. The American Cancer Society estimates that 241 740 American men will be diagnosed with the disease and 28 170 men will die of it in 2012. Prostate cancer demographics have changed dramatically over the past 30 years. The prostate cancer age-adjusted incidence rate increased through the 1980s and peaked in the early to mid-1990s. The incidence rate has declined since. American mortality rates rose through the 1980s and peaked in 1991. Today, the American incidence rates are below 1975 levels. Both the incidence rate and the 5-year survival rates are heavily influenced by the introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen test and the widespread use of it in cancer screening. The effect of screening on prostate cancer mortality is less certain. Screening has caused a dramatic increase in the number and proportion of men diagnosed with localized disease. Outcomes studies among men treated with radical prostatectomy show that greater than 30% serum prostate-specific antigen relapse rates are common. This suggests that many men who are diagnosed with "localized early stage disease" actually have "apparently localized early stage disease," which is really low-volume metastatic disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 February 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 2
                : e0228773
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
                [2 ] Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
                [4 ] Department of Health & Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
                [5 ] Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
                [6 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer’s Prevention, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
                Pennington Biomedical Research Center, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-3387
                Article
                PONE-D-19-28019
                10.1371/journal.pone.0228773
                7017990
                32053654
                073b4183-a8e4-472d-9276-888f23f3ce76
                © 2020 Lucas et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 7 October 2019
                : 22 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: R25 CA122061
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000049, National Institute on Aging;
                Award ID: P30-AG21332
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: P30CA012197
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000049, National Institute on Aging;
                Award ID: N01-AG-6-2101; N01-AG-6-2103; N01-AG-6-2106; NIA grant R01-AG028050
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000056, National Institute of Nursing Research;
                Award ID: R01-NR012459
                Dr. Lucas’s work on this project was partly supported by a National Cancer Institute training grant (R25 CA122061). Dr. Klepin received support from Wake Forest University Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30-AG21332). Dr. Fanning received support from the National Institute on Aging grants, 5R21AG058249-02, 5P30AG021332-17, and 1R01AG059186-01A1. Scott Isom is supported by National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Center Support Grant award number P30CA012197 issued to the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center. Dr. Kritchevsky received support from Wake Forest School of Medicine Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30- AG021332). This research was supported by National Institute on Aging (NIA) Contracts N01-AG-6-2101; N01-AG-6-2103; N01-AG-6-2106; NIA grant R01-AG028050, and NINR grant R01-NR012459. This research was funded in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute on Aging. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Biological Locomotion
                Walking
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Biological Locomotion
                Walking
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Genitourinary Tract Tumors
                Prostate Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Urology
                Prostate Diseases
                Prostate Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Cancer Risk Factors
                Aging and Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Risk Factors
                Aging and Cancer
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Developmental Biology
                Organism Development
                Aging
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Aging
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Physiological Processes
                Aging
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Physical Activity
                Physical Fitness
                Exercise
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Sports and Exercise Medicine
                Exercise
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Sports Science
                Sports and Exercise Medicine
                Exercise
                People and places
                Population groupings
                Ethnicities
                African American people
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biomechanics
                Hand Strength
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are in Dryad. DOI: ( https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.47d7wm38z).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article