14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      COVID‐19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review

      review-article
      , RN, MSc, PhD 1 , 2 , , PhD, MD 2 , 3 , 4 , , , PhD, MSc Hons, BAppSc, RN 2 , 4 , , PhD, RN 2 , 4 , , BND 2 , 4 , , RN 1 , , PhD, MA, GDNEduc, BSc, RN 2 , 4
      Journal of Clinical Nursing
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      coronavirus, COVID‐19, vaccination, vaccine acceptance, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims and objectives

          To synthesise evidence regarding vaccination intention, identify factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals and the general populations globally.

          Background

          As COVID‐19 vaccine becomes available worldwide, attention is being directed to community vaccine uptake, to achieve population‐wide immunity. A number of factors have been reported to influence vaccine intention.

          Methods

          Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of COVID‐19 vaccination intention related literature published on or before 31 December 2020 from seven databases was undertaken.

          Results

          Thirty articles were included in this systematic review. Overall COVID‐19 vaccination intention during the first year of the pandemic ranged from 27.7% to 93.3%. Findings highlighted that socio‐demographic differences, perceptions of risk and susceptibility to COVID‐19 and vaccine attributes influenced vaccination intention. Healthcare professionals particularly, nurses have higher vaccine hesitancy reportedly due to concerns regarding vaccine safety and efficacy and mistrust of health authorities. Negative information about COVID‐19 vaccines in the social media and low confidence in the health system were associated with lower acceptability among the community. Interestingly, cumulative increase in COVID‐19 caseloads of countries over time was not associated with vaccination intention.

          Conclusions

          The significant variability in vaccine intention rates worldwide would hamper efforts to achieve immunity against COVID‐19. Nurses’ concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy need to be addressed to increase vaccine acceptance and maximise their influence on vaccination decision in the community. As misinformation through social media negatively impacts vaccination uptake, authoritative and reliable information on vaccine attributes, disease risks and vaccination benefits are needed.

          Relevance to clinical practice

          Concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy including misinformation are important contributors to vaccine hesitancy. Addressing these factors, particularly among nurses who are considered trusted influencers of vaccination decisions in the community is an important strategy for pandemic preparedness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

          Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analysis) Statement--a reporting guideline published in 1999--there have been several conceptual, methodological, and practical advances regarding the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Also, reviews of published systematic reviews have found that key information about these studies is often poorly reported. Realizing these issues, an international group that included experienced authors and methodologists developed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) as an evolution of the original QUOROM guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evaluations of health care interventions. The PRISMA Statement consists of a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram. The checklist includes items deemed essential for transparent reporting of a systematic review. In this Explanation and Elaboration document, we explain the meaning and rationale for each checklist item. For each item, we include an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature. The PRISMA Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.prisma-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine

            Several coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are currently in human trials. In June 2020, we surveyed 13,426 people in 19 countries to determine potential acceptance rates and factors influencing acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Of these, 71.5% of participants reported that they would be very or somewhat likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and 61.4% reported that they would accept their employer’s recommendation to do so. Differences in acceptance rates ranged from almost 90% (in China) to less than 55% (in Russia). Respondents reporting higher levels of trust in information from government sources were more likely to accept a vaccine and take their employer’s advice to do so.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vaccine hesitancy: the next challenge in the fight against COVID-19

              Vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to full population inoculation against highly infectious diseases. Coincident with the rapid developments of COVID-19 vaccines globally, concerns about the safety of such a vaccine could contribute to vaccine hesitancy. We analyzed 1941 anonymous questionnaires completed by healthcare workers and members of the general Israeli population, regarding acceptance of a potential COVID-19 vaccine. Our results indicate that healthcare staff involved in the care of COVID-19 positive patients, and individuals considering themselves at risk of disease, were more likely to self-report acquiescence to COVID-19 vaccination if and when available. In contrast, parents, nurses, and medical workers not caring for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients expressed higher levels of vaccine hesitancy. Interventional educational campaigns targeted towards populations at risk of vaccine hesitancy are therefore urgently needed to combat misinformation and avoid low inoculation rates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Assistant Professor
                Role: Adjunct Research Fellowd.maneze@westernsydney.edu.au
                Role: Associate Professor & Director of School Research
                Role: Senior Lecturer
                Role: PhD Candidate
                Role: MSc Candidate
                Role: Professor & Director of Academic Workforce
                Journal
                J Clin Nurs
                J Clin Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702
                JOCN
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                06 July 2021
                06 July 2021
                : 10.1111/jocn.15951
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Nursing School Isra University of Jordan Amman Jordan
                [ 2 ] Western Sydney University School of Nursing and Midwifery Penrith NSW Australia
                [ 3 ] South Western Sydney Local Health District Multicultural Health Service Campbelltown NSW Australia
                [ 4 ] Centre for Oral Health Outcomes and Research Translation (COHORT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research Liverpool NSW Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Della Maneze, Western Sydney University|School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

                Email: d.maneze@ 123456westernsydney.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6475-8804
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-7462
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-8061
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-472X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-4086
                Article
                JOCN15951
                10.1111/jocn.15951
                8447353
                34227179
                0802e489-f42a-467e-8491-edadb42bd9f2
                © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 20 May 2021
                : 27 March 2021
                : 22 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 25, Words: 28619
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.7 mode:remove_FC converted:17.09.2021

                Nursing
                coronavirus,covid‐19,vaccination,vaccine acceptance,vaccine hesitancy,vaccine uptake
                Nursing
                coronavirus, covid‐19, vaccination, vaccine acceptance, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake

                Comments

                Comment on this article