11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Land Cover Classification using Google Earth Engine and Random Forest Classifier—The Role of Image Composition

      , ,
      Remote Sensing
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Land cover information plays a vital role in many aspects of life, from scientific and economic to political. Accurate information about land cover affects the accuracy of all subsequent applications, therefore accurate and timely land cover information is in high demand. In land cover classification studies over the past decade, higher accuracies were produced when using time series satellite images than when using single date images. Recently, the availability of the Google Earth Engine (GEE), a cloud-based computing platform, has gained the attention of remote sensing based applications where temporal aggregation methods derived from time series images are widely applied (i.e., the use the metrics such as mean or median), instead of time series images. In GEE, many studies simply select as many images as possible to fill gaps without concerning how different year/season images might affect the classification accuracy. This study aims to analyze the effect of different composition methods, as well as different input images, on the classification results. We use Landsat 8 surface reflectance (L8sr) data with eight different combination strategies to produce and evaluate land cover maps for a study area in Mongolia. We implemented the experiment on the GEE platform with a widely applied algorithm, the Random Forest (RF) classifier. Our results show that all the eight datasets produced moderately to highly accurate land cover maps, with overall accuracy over 84.31%. Among the eight datasets, two time series datasets of summer scenes (images from 1 June to 30 September) produced the highest accuracy (89.80% and 89.70%), followed by the median composite of the same input images (88.74%). The difference between these three classifications was not significant based on the McNemar test (p > 0.05). However, significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed for all other pairs involving one of these three datasets. The results indicate that temporal aggregation (e.g., median) is a promising method, which not only significantly reduces data volume (resulting in an easier and faster analysis) but also produces an equally high accuracy as time series data. The spatial consistency among the classification results was relatively low compared to the general high accuracy, showing that the selection of the dataset used in any classification on GEE is an important and crucial step, because the input images for the composition play an essential role in land cover classification, particularly with snowy, cloudy and expansive areas like Mongolia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)

            A.R Huete (1988)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space

              Bo-Cai Gao (1996)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Remote Sensing
                Remote Sensing
                MDPI AG
                2072-4292
                August 2020
                July 27 2020
                : 12
                : 15
                : 2411
                Article
                10.3390/rs12152411
                0851f156-ca29-46b8-949d-613654f8068e
                © 2020

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article