1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How do appraisal as threat or challenge, efficacy, and environmental quality affect wellbeing in the COVID-19 pandemic?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In crises, it is of great relevance to identify mechanisms that help people to maintain a certain level of wellbeing. This paper investigates whether appraising the COVID-19 pandemic as a threat vs. as a challenge has different effects on subjective wellbeing during the pandemic. Furthermore, we study the role of the perceived local environmental quality for individuals' subjective wellbeing.

          Methods

          Via online survey study with two times of measurement ( N = 758), we investigated (a) the prediction of participants' wellbeing in June 2020 and June 2021 through five variables and (b) how these five variables moderated within-participant differences in subjective wellbeing over time.

          Results

          Results showed that a stronger perception of the pandemic as a threat (feeling worried) and a lower education in June 2020 predicted a lower subjective wellbeing in 2020 and 2021. A stronger challenge appraisal (feeling confident), higher efficacy expectations, and positive perceptions of the local environmental quality in June 2020 predicted a higher wellbeing in 2020 and 2021. There was no substantial change in participants' aggregated wellbeing over time. However, those who perceived the pandemic more as a threat in June 2020 struggled more with negative changes in their wellbeing, whereas those who perceived the pandemic more as a challenge reported a higher wellbeing.

          Conclusion

          It seems key to support people in activating positive feelings to successfully cope with crises.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

          Background Increases in mental health problems have been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to examine the extent to which mental health symptoms changed during the pandemic in 2020, whether changes were persistent or short lived, and if changes were symptom specific. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies examining changes in mental health among the same group of participants before vs. during the pandemic in 2020. Results Sixty-five studies were included. Compared to pre-pandemic outbreak, there was an overall increase in mental health symptoms observed during March-April 2020 (SMC = .102 [95% CI: .026 to .192]) that significantly declined over time and became non-significant (May-July SMC = .067 [95% CI: -.022 to .157]. Compared to measures of anxiety (SMC = 0.13, p  = 0.02) and general mental health (SMC = -.03, p  = 0.65), increases in depression and mood disorder symptoms tended to be larger and remained significantly elevated in May-July [0.20, 95% CI: .099 to .302]. In primary analyses increases were most pronounced among samples with physical health conditions and there was no evidence of any change in symptoms among samples with a pre-existing mental health condition. Limitations There was a high degree of unexplained heterogeneity observed (I 2 s > 90%), indicating that change in mental health was highly variable across samples. Conclusions There was a small increase in mental health symptoms soon after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic that decreased and was comparable to pre-pandemic levels by mid-2020 among most population sub-groups and symptom types.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective

            We provide consensus on the benefits of nature experience for mental health, and a model for integrating them into urban design.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                04 January 2023
                2022
                04 January 2023
                : 13
                : 1009977
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Medical Faculty, University Clinic of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg , Magdeburg, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Environmental Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg , Magdeburg, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ihua Chen, Qufu Normal University, China

                Reviewed by: Ricardo M. Tamayo, National University of Colombia, Colombia; Cuihong Cao, Shandong Women's University, China

                *Correspondence: Hannah Wallis ✉ Hannah.wallis@ 123456med.ovgu.de

                This article was submitted to Public Mental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1009977
                9875378
                08581c75-0c52-4c44-9345-dc058cf42c35
                Copyright © 2023 Wallis, Holzen, Sieverding, Matthies and Schmidt.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 August 2022
                : 05 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 10, Words: 6499
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, doi 10.13039/100007636;
                This work was funded by the German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt-DBU, DBU-AZ 36002). We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of Magdeburg University.
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                subjective wellbeing,threat appraisal,environmental quality,efficacy,covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article