Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Methamphetamine, d-amphetamine and p-chloroamphetamine induced neurotoxicity differentially effect impulsive responding on the stop-signal task in rats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abused amphetamines, such as d-amphetamine (AMPH) and methamphetamine (METH), are highly addictive and destructive to health and productive lifestyles. The abuse of these drugs is associated with impulsive behavior, which is likely to contribute to addiction. The amphetamines also differentially damage dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) systems, which regulate impulsive behavior; therefore, exposure to these drugs may differentially alter impulsive behavior to effect the progression of addiction. We examined the impact of neurotoxicity induced by three amphetamines on impulsive action using a stop-signal task in rats. Animals were rewarded with a food pellet after lever pressing ( i.e. a go trial), unless an auditory cue was presented and withholding lever press gained reward ( i.e. a stop trial). Animals were trained on the task and then exposed to a neurotoxic regimen of either AMPH, p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), or METH. These regimens preferentially reduced DA transporter levels in striatum, 5-HT transporter levels in prefrontal cortex, or both, respectively. Assessment of performance on the stop-signal task beginning one week after the treatment revealed that AMPH produced a deficit in go-trial performance, whereas PCA did not alter performance on either trial type. In contrast, METH produced a deficit in stop-trial performance ( i.e. impulsive action) but not go-trial performance. These findings suggest that the different neurotoxic consequences of substituted amphetamines are associated with different effects on inhibitory control over behavior. Thus, the course of addiction and maladaptive behavior resulting from exposure to these substances is likely to differ.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          100929017
          30332
          Neurotox Res
          Neurotox Res
          Neurotoxicity research
          1029-8428
          1476-3524
          23 February 2016
          04 February 2016
          May 2016
          01 May 2017
          : 29
          : 4
          : 569-582
          Affiliations
          Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 30 S. 2000 E., University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
          Author notes
          []Author of correspondence: Dr. Teri M. Furlong, Dept. Pharmacology and Toxicology, 30 S. 2000 E., Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, Tel: (801) 585-1253, Fax: (801) 585-5111, teri.furlong@ 123456utah.edu
          Article
          PMC4821695 PMC4821695 4821695 nihpa757953
          10.1007/s12640-016-9605-9
          4821695
          26846719
          0866c9b4-3f57-4a85-a216-2743a48f0abf
          History
          Categories
          Article

          serotonin,Amphetamine,stop-signal task,behavioral inhibition,impulsive action,dopamine

          Comments

          Comment on this article