13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Empathy is hypothesized to have several components, including affective, cognitive, and somatic contributors. The only validated, self-report measure to date that assesses all three forms of empathy is the Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale (CASES), but no current study has reported the psychometric properties of this scale outside of the initial U.S. sample. This study reports the first psychometric analysis of a non-English translation of the CASES.

          Methods

          Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of CASES as well as its associations with callous-unemotional traits in 860 male and female children (mean age 11.54± .64 years) from the China Jintan Child Cohort Study.

          Results

          Analyses supported a three-factor model of cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy, with satisfactory fit indices consistent with the psychometric properties of the English version of CASES. Construct validity was established by three findings. First, females scored significantly higher in empathy than males. Second, lower scores of empathy were associated with lower IQ. Third, children with lower empathy also showed more callous-unemotional attributes.

          Conclusions

          We established for the first time cross-cultural validity for Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale (CASES). Our Chinese data supports the use of this new instrument in non-Western samples, and affirms the utility of this instrument for a comprehensive assessment of empathy in children.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures.

          Close relationship partners often share successes and triumphs with one another, but this experience is rarely the focus of empirical study. In this study, 79 dating couples completed measures of relationship well-being and then participated in videotaped interactions in which they took turns discussing recent positive and negative events. Disclosers rated how understood, validated, and cared for they felt in each discussion, and outside observers coded responders' behavior. Both self-report data and observational codes showed that 2 months later, responses to positive event discussions were more closely related to relationship well-being and break-up than were responses to negative event discussions. The results are discussed in terms of the recurrent, but often overlooked, role that positive emotional exchanges play in building relationship resources.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

            Based on the premise that bullies are deficient in empathy or even lack it completely, bullying prevention and intervention programs often include empathy training. These programs are not always as effective as they aim to be, which may be caused by a failure to acknowledge the multidimensional nature of empathy as well as its complex association with involvement in bullying. To provide a clear overview of the research on the association between empathy and involvement in bullying, this article systematically reviews 40 studies on the association of cognitive empathy (24 studies) and affective empathy (38 studies) with four categories of involvement in bullying: bullying, victimization, defending, and bystanding. The results showed that bullying was negatively associated with cognitive and-in particular-affective empathy. Victimization was negatively associated with cognitive empathy but not with affective empathy. Defending was consistently positively associated with both types of empathy. Contradictory findings were observed in bystanding, with studies reporting both negative and positive associations with cognitive empathy, and studies reporting negative and no associations with affective empathy. Together, the findings stress the importance of the distinction between cognitive and affective empathy in involvement in bullying and suggest different intervention strategies for the four types of involvement in bullying.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Emerging Study of Positive Empathy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                7 May 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 5
                : e0195268
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
                [2 ] University of Maryland, College Park, College of Education, College Park, MD, United States of America
                [3 ] Hebei University School of Nursing, Baoding, Hebei, P.R.China
                [4 ] University of Pennsylvania Departments of Criminology, Psychiatry, and Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
                University of Florence, ITALY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-6153
                Article
                PONE-D-17-27285
                10.1371/journal.pone.0195268
                5937997
                29734373
                0895eb5e-3248-4c2e-adf3-968f5dfae250
                © 2018 Liu et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 July 2017
                : 9 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: R01-ES-018858, K02-ES-019878, and K01-ES015877
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Institutes of Health (R01-ES-018858, K02-ES-019878, K01-ES015877 and P30-ES-013508). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                Chinese People
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Intelligence Tests
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Intelligence Tests
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Probability Theory
                Probability Distribution
                Skewness
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Child Development
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article