8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decreased visual acuity resulting from glistening and sub-surface nano-glistening formation in intraocular lenses: A retrospective analysis of 5 cases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To report on five patients with decreased visual acuity due to glistening and severe sub-surface nano-glistening (SSNG) formation within their intraocular lenses (IOLs).

          Design

          Case reports and analysis of extracted IOLs.

          Participants and samples

          We report improved visual acuity when IOLs with severe glistening and SSNG were exchanged for clear IOLs in five patients.

          Methods

          Case reports.

          Main outcome measures

          The main outcome measure was visual acuity. The secondary outcome measure was light transmission. Explanted IOLs were subjected to investigation. Pre- and postoperative slit lamp images of the anterior eye and microscopic images of the extracted IOLs were taken and compared. Light transmission of the IOL was measured using a double beam type spectrophotometer. An integrated value of the percentage light transmittance in the visible light spectrum was calculated.

          Results

          We report on five patients whose visual acuity improved when IOLs were exchanged because of severe glistening and SSNG. All of the affected IOLs were MA60BM (Alcon, Forth Wroth Texas, USA) and the original implantation had occurred over a range of 6–15 years prior to the IOL exchange. Light transmission was decreased in all affected lenses compared to a similar control IOL.

          Conclusions

          Although only a few reports of cases in which glistening and SSNG have progressed to the level of decreased visual function have been published, the likelihood is that this phenomena will increase as the severity and incidence of these inclusions have been shown to increase with time. Appropriate evaluations of visual function in such patients are needed and consideration should be given to IOL exchange in symptomatic patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Glistenings and surface light scattering in intraocular lenses.

          Glistenings are fluid-filled microvacuoles that form within the intraocular lens (IOL) optic when the IOL is in an aqueous environment. They are observed in all types of IOLs but have been mainly associated with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Experimental and clinical studies suggest the various hydrophobic acrylic IOLs on the market exhibit different tendencies toward glistenings. Factors influencing glistening formation include IOL material composition, manufacturing technique, packaging, associated conditions such as glaucoma or those leading to breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier, as well as concurrent use of ocular medications. Although the impact of glistenings on postoperative visual function and the evolution of glistenings in the late postoperative period remain controversial, IOL explantation has rarely been reported. The phenomenon of surface light scattering has also been described in association with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Its mechanism of formation is controversial but may be related to long-term phase separation water near the IOL surface, although not seen as microvacuoles. The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Copyright 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hydrophobic versus double-square-edged hydrophilic foldable acrylic intraocular lens: effect on posterior capsule opacification.

            To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) 2 years after cataract surgery with implantation of a hydrophobic acrylic or single-piece sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan. Case-control study. Patients with bilateral senile cataract were prospectively randomized to receive a hydrophobic IOL (Acrysof SA60AT) in 1 eye and a hydrophilic IOL (Meridian HP60M) in the other eye. The PCO density value, degree of IOL decentration and tilt, and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured using Scheimpflug videophotography 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Visual acuity and the number of eyes requiring neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy were also assessed. The study evaluated 16 eyes (63 patients). The PCO value in the hydrophilic group increased significantly with time and was statistically significantly greater than in the hydrophobic group 18 and 24 months postoperatively (both P .05), and there were no statistically significant postoperative differences in these parameters between the 2 IOL groups (P > .05). Two years after surgery, the hydrophobic IOL group had less PCO, a lower capsulotomy rate, and better visual acuity than the hydrophilic IOL group. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical and experimental observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses.

              To determine whether or not glistening particles in implanted acrylic intraocular lenses (IOL) increase with the passage of time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Saudi J Ophthalmol
                Saudi J Ophthalmol
                Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology
                Elsevier
                1319-4534
                29 July 2015
                Oct-Dec 2015
                29 July 2015
                : 29
                : 4
                : 259-263
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Ophthalmology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
                [b ]Shohzankai Medical Foundation, Miyake Eye Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
                [c ]Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Canada
                [d ]Department of Visual Science, University of Toronto, Canada
                [e ]Department of Ophthalmology, Poznan City Hospital, Poznan, Poland
                [f ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Jozef Strus Poznan City Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, 3 Szwajcarska St, 361-285 Poznan, Poland. Tel./fax: +48 61 8739 169. ae.grzybowski@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1319-4534(15)00085-5
                10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.07.001
                4625192
                26586975
                094a4882-abc1-4f7c-8afd-9fcf38076e65
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 October 2014
                : 14 May 2015
                : 23 July 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                glistening,sub-surface nano-glistening,whitening,hydrophobic acrylic iol,microvacuole

                Comments

                Comment on this article