4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An intensive multimodal group programme for patients with psychotic disorders at risk of rehospitalization: a controlled intervention study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          On the basis of earlier experiences in Germany and England, we developed an intensive multimodal group programme (FACT Plus) for psychotic-spectrum patients. By combining it with regular Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) (care as usual), we intended to reduce psychiatric rehospitalizations and mental healthcare costs.

          Methods

          We included adult patients (>18 years) with a psychotic spectrum disorder who had had at least one psychiatric admission in the 2 years before inclusion. FACT Plus was delivered weekly for 9 months. The intervention group was recruited in northern Rotterdam (the Netherlands), and the control group was recruited in southern Rotterdam. The primary outcome measure was length of stay (LOS) and the secondary outcome measures were mental healthcare costs and compulsory admissions.

          Results

          We included 52 patients in the intervention group and 61 patients in the control group. During the 12-month observation period, the mean LOS per patient was 15.2 (intervention group) and 34.6 (control group). This represents a difference of 19.4 days (56.1%). This result was statistically significant (B = −.859, SE = .497, p = .042) in a regression model correcting for baseline differences between the groups. Mean total mental healthcare costs per patient were €21,098 in the intervention group) versus €25,054 in the control group, a difference of about €4000 per patient (16%). In addition, there were zero compulsory admissions in the intervention group and nine in the control group.

          Conclusions

          After the addition of FACT Plus to regular FACT, psychiatric LOS was substantially lower in the intervention group than in the control group. This result was accompanied by a limited reduction in mental healthcare costs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FACT: a Dutch version of ACT.

          Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is a well-defined service delivery model for the care and treatment of the most severely mentally ill in the community. We have opted for a Dutch version named 'Function' ACT or FACT. In a FACT team, ACT is one of the functions that the team can perform. For more stable long-term patients FACT provides coordinated multidisciplinary treatment and care by individual case management. Unstable patients at risk of relapse are followed with assertive outreach care by the same team, working with a shared caseload for this subgroup. This article describes the service model and everyday practice in FACT.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation.

            A conceptual model for the development of community-based treatment programs for the chronically disabled psychiatric patient was developed, and the results of a controlled study and follow-up are reported. A community-treatment program that was based on the conceptual model was compared with conventional treatment (ie, progressive short-term hospitalization plus aftercare). The results have shown that use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients. When the special programming was discontinued, many of the gains that were attained deteriorated, and use of the hospital rose sharply. The results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interventions to Reduce Compulsory Psychiatric Admissions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

              Compulsory admissions, defined as admissions against the will of the patient (according to local judicial procedures), have a strong effect on psychiatric patients. In several Western countries, the rate of such admissions is tending to rise. Its reduction is urgently needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-88-405-6950 , ma.dejong@yulius.nl
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                5 August 2019
                5 August 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 241
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Yulius Mental Health, PO Box 1001, 3300 BA Dordrecht, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 000000040459992X, GRID grid.5645.2, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute (ESPRi), Department of Psychiatry, , Erasmus University Medical Centre, ; Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9719-5697
                Article
                2229
                10.1186/s12888-019-2229-x
                6683433
                31382937
                09f3846b-918e-4313-b35c-328aada444e8
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 30 April 2019
                : 30 July 2019
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                community mental healthcare,severe mental illness,group therapy,psychotic disorder,psychiatric admission,mental healthcare costs

                Comments

                Comment on this article