6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Barriers to tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus treatment guidelines adherence among nurses initiating and managing anti-retroviral therapy in KwaZulu-Natal and North West provinces

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 2
      Curationis
      AOSIS

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Nurses, as front-line care providers in the South Africa’s health care system, are called upon to deliver integrated interventions for tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (TB and HIV) including nurse-initiated management of anti-retroviral therapy (NIMART) and anti-TB treatment. Adherence to treatment guidelines and factors associated with non-adherence to treatment guidelines among nurses remain under explored.

          Purpose

          To explore and describe barriers to treatment guidelines adherence among nurses initiating and managing anti-retroviral therapy and anti-TB treatment in KwaZulu-Natal and North West provinces.

          Design

          This study employed a qualitative exploratory descriptive design.

          Methods

          Four semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted during 2014 each consisting of four to eight NIMART trained nurses. Audiotaped interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Atlas T.I. software.

          Findings

          During data analysis, two themes emerged: (1) NIMART trained nurses’ distress about TB and HIV guidelines adherence that is inclusive of lack of agreement with guidelines, poor motivation to implement guidelines, poor clinical support and supervision, resistance to change, insufficient knowledge or lack of awareness and (2) exterior factors inhibiting nurses’ adherence to treatment guidelines which incorporated organisational factors, guidelines-related factors and patient-related factors.

          Conclusion

          This qualitative study identified that nurses have substantial concerns over guideline adherence. If NIMART trained nurses’ barriers inhibiting adherence to treatment guidelines cannot be remedied, patient outcomes may suffer and South Africa will struggle to meet the 90-90-90 targets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners

          Background Despite considerable efforts to promote and support guideline use, adherence is often suboptimal. Barriers to adherence vary not only across guidelines but also across recommendations within guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the perceived barriers to guideline adherence among GPs by focusing on key recommendations within guidelines. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey among 703 GPs in the Netherlands. Sixteen key recommendations were derived from four national guidelines. Six statements were included to address the attitudes towards guidelines in general. In addition, GPs were asked to rate their perceived adherence (one statement) and the perceived barriers (fourteen statements) for each of the key recommendations, based on an existing framework. Results 264 GPs (38%) completed the questionnaire. Although 35% of the GPs reported difficulties in changing routines and habits to follow guidelines, 89% believed that following guidelines leads to improved patient care. Perceived adherence varied between 52 and 95% across recommendations (mean: 77%). The most perceived barriers were related to external factors, in particular patient ability and behaviour (mean: 30%) and patient preferences (mean: 23%). Lack of applicability of recommendations in general (mean: 22%) and more specifically to individual patients (mean: 25%) were also frequently perceived as barriers. The scores on perceived barriers differed largely between recommendations [minimum range 14%; maximum range 67%]. Conclusions Dutch GPs have a positive attitude towards the NHG guidelines, report high adherence rates and low levels of perceived barriers. However, the perceived adherence and perceived barriers varied largely across recommendations. The most perceived barriers across recommendations are patient related, suggesting that current guidelines do not always adequately incorporate patient preferences, needs and abilities. It may be useful to provide tools such as decision aids, supporting the flexible use of guidelines to individual patients in practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Facilitators and barriers to clinical practice guideline use among nurses.

            Clinical practice guidelines, which are designed to encourage consistent, efficient applications of scientific evidence in the daily practice of clinicians, are often underutilized. The majority of research concerning their implementation and use has focused on the work of physicians; more research concerning their use by nurses is needed. We sought to learn more about nurses' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the use of clinical practice guidelines. This study examined free-text responses to two open-ended survey questions provided by 575 RNs working at 134 Veterans Affairs medical centers nationwide. We performed conventional content analysis on these data, which allowed thematic categories and subcategories of responses to emerge. A majority of identified facilitators and barriers to nurses' use of clinical practice guidelines were external (outside the individual nurse's control). The most frequently mentioned facilitators and barriers were in the categories of communication, education/orientation/training, and time/staffing/workload. Social and organizational factors appear to play critical roles in nurses' adoption and use of guidelines. Health care leaders seeking to improve clinical practice guideline use among nurses should ensure that facilitators and barriers-particularly those that are social and organizational-are considered and addressed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pediatricians' awareness of and attitudes about four clinical practice guidelines.

              The increasing complexity of medical care and a desire to increase quality and control costs have led to growing use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). It is unclear how helpful these guidelines are to the practitioners expected to use them. We surveyed pediatricians about their knowledge and impressions of four well-publicized CPGs: the American Academy of Pediatrics' "Practice Parameter for Hyperbilirubinemia in Newborns" (hyperbilirubinemia), "A Guideline for the Management of Febrile Infants" (fever), the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research's "Guideline for Otitis Media With Effusion" (otitis), and the US Preventive Services Task Force Guide to Clinical Preventive Services (preventive care). 1) What percentage of practicing pediatricians are aware of these guidelines? 2) How helpful do they find them? 3) What are practitioners' perceived limitations of these guidelines? 4) Have these guidelines affected provider behavior? 5) Are there features of a provider's training or practice that are associated with changing practice as a result of guidelines? A national survey of 600 pediatricians selected at random from the American Medical Association master file. A total of 300 of 555 eligible participants (54%) returned surveys. Of the respondents, 66% were aware of the hyperbilirubinemia guideline, 64% of the fever guideline, 50% of the otitis guideline, but only 16% knew of the preventive care guidelines. Mean helpfulness scores (1 to 10 scale, where 1 = "not at all helpful" and 10 = "extremely helpful") ranged from 3.67 to 6.67 for the different guidelines. In terms of limitations, 15% to 33% of respondents reported that CPGs were "too cookbook," 6% to 19% reported that they were "too time-consuming," and 4% to 16% reported that they were "too cumbersome." Additional reported limitations were believing that a guideline left no room for personal experience and judgment, concern of increased liability risk, and poor parental acceptance of CPG recommendations. The proportions reporting change in management as a result of a CPG were 28% for the hyperbilirubinemia guideline, 36% for the fever guideline, 19% for the preventive care guidelines, and 28% for the otitis guideline. Mean helpfulness scores reported by nonuniversity-affiliated physicians were significantly higher than those reported by university-affiliated physicians. In a regression model of respondents aware of a particular guideline, more recent graduation from medical school and increased helpfulness scores were associated with guideline-related behavior change. In their present form, CPGs are not perceived as very helpful by most practitioners. More recent medical school graduates and nonuniversity-affiliated physicians are more likely to find them helpful and more likely to change their behavior because of them.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Curationis
                Curationis
                CUR
                Curationis
                AOSIS
                0379-8577
                2223-6279
                26 March 2018
                2018
                : 41
                : 1
                : 1808
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing Science, North-West University, South Africa
                [2 ]School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Lufuno Makhado, 22891935@ 123456nwu.ac.za
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-9308
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-6839
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-0134
                Article
                CUR-41-1808
                10.4102/curationis.v41i1.1808
                6091579
                29781696
                0a157319-f77a-4485-ae50-51c9cae5a357
                © 2018. The Authors

                Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

                History
                : 05 May 2017
                : 13 December 2017
                Categories
                Original Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article