2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      B-Hex, an ace up the sleeve for small pupil phacoemulsification

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To analyze the utility and the nuances of implanting the B-HEX® Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devices, India) at various stages in small pupil phacoemulsification.

          Methods: This prospective interventional case series was undertaken to assess the utility of B-Hex in small pupil phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Our series comprised of 50 cataract cases with small pupils of various etiologies, operated by a single surgeon at our private practice, beginning February 2018. Cataract cases with pharmacological dilation of < 4 mm underwent phacoemulsification with B-Hex implantation. It was employed at the outset or interim, whenever the need arose.

          Results: The B-Hex ring is extremely handy and useful in small pupil phacoemulsification. The average age of our study cohort was 62 years. In 38 cases B-Hex was employed before making a capsulorhexis. Progressive pupillary constriction during nuclear disassembly warranted the utilization of the device in 9 cases, while the remaining 3 cases had a retained epi-nuclear plate or significant cortex and the ring was placed after nucleus removal. No significant complication was noted. Postoperatively, the pupil dimensions, notably the architecture, were maintained. No significant AC reaction was noted. Intraocular pressure was not high.

          Conclusion: Our experience showed that B-Hex is secure and easy to use under topical anesthesia. The learning curve is shallow and the technique is precise. B-Hex is truly an ace up the sleeve.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Premium intraocular lenses: The past, present and future

          Purpose To present potential benefits as well as limitations of premium intraocular lens (IOL) use, and provide insight in future of premium cataract surgery. Methods Bibliographic research was performed in PubMed/Medline database, and the most recently updated papers were evaluated. Keywords used were: premium intraocular lens, multifocal intraocular lens, toric intraocular lens, toric multifocal intraocular lens, accommodative intraocular lens, and the respective brand names. Results Multifocal IOLs provide uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0.03 logMAR in 82.3%–95.7% of patients and overall spectacle independence in 81%–85% of patients. Toric IOLs provide UDVA of 0.3 logMAR in 70%–95% of patients, residual astigmatism of 1 D or less is noted in 67%–88% of patients, and spectacle independence is reported in 60%–85% of patients. Toric multifocal IOLs provide UDVA of 0.3 logMAR in 92%–97% of patients, and spectacle independence is reported in 79%–90% of patients. Accommodative IOLs represent intensively developing field in ophthalmology, and the results are still variable depending on the IOL model. Conclusions Premium IOL technology and advanced surgical techniques have significantly improved postoperative visual outcomes. Future developments will potentiate development of new premium IOL designs that will provide spectacle independence and excellent visual outcomes after cataract surgery.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pharmacologic pupil dilation as a predictive test for the risk for intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome.

            To evaluate the effect of α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (α1-ARAs) on pupil diameter and determine whether the diameter predicts intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome (IFIS). Ophthalmology Section, Palermo University, Palermo, Italy. Prospective cohort study. Male outpatients taking tamsulosin, α(1)-ARAs, or no α(1)-ARAs having phacoemulsification were recruited. Pupils were measured 1 month preoperatively, immediately preoperatively, and postoperatively under mesopic low (0.4 lux) and high (4.0 lux) illumination after pharmacologic dilation. The IFIS severity was graded. Each group comprised 50 patients. Pharmacologic dilation in both α(1)-ARA groups was statistically significantly less than in the no α1-ARA group 1 month preoperatively, immediately before surgery, and postoperatively (P=.001, P<.0005, and P<.0005, respectively). The IFIS incidence differed significantly between the tamsulosin and other α(1)-ARA groups and the no α1-ARA group (P<.0005 and P=.017, respectively) and between the tamsulosin group and the other α1-ARA group (P=.027). On regression analysis, the hazard ratio for overall IFIS incidence was 3.8 in the other α(1)-ARA group (P=.012) and 10.1 in the tamsulosin group (P<.0005). Pupil size was inversely related to IFIS incidence and severity (P<.0005). A dilated pupil of 7.0 mm or smaller had 73% sensitivity and 95% specificity for predicting IFIS (P=.0001). Pupil dilation was inhibited by α(1)-ARAs, in particular tamsulosin. For a pupil 7.0 mm or smaller, the risk for IFIS existed regardless of α(1)-ARAs treatment, which surgeons should take into consideration. Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Small pupil and cataract surgery.

              Presence of a small pupil is still considered a major challenge for cataract surgeons. Appropriate mydriasis and maintaining it is of paramount importance to prevent potential serious complications. Recently, more interventions and instruments are available for the cataract surgeons to deal with these challenging cases. The intention of this review is to discuss the preoperative and intraoperative considerations and techniques for cataract surgery in small pupil and related conditions and to discuss new developments in management of small pupil in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rom J Ophthalmol
                Rom J Ophthalmol
                RomJOphthalmol
                Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology
                Romanian Society of Ophthalmology (Romania )
                2457-4325
                2501-2533
                Jan-Mar 2022
                : 66
                : 1
                : 61-68
                Affiliations
                [* ]Perfect Vision Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Gulshan Nagar, Nowgam, Srinagar, India
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Rimsha Sarosh, MS Ophthalmology, Fellowship, Paediatric Ophthalmology and Adult Strabismus, FICO, MRCS Ed Ophth, MRCS Ophth Glasg, Consultant Paediatric Ophthalmology and Cataract Services, Perfect Vision Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Mir House, Naseem Bagh, Hazratbal, Srinagar-190006, Phone: 01 943 500 902, 01 943 500 903, Mobile phone: +917 051 576 088, E-mail: rimsha.sarosh@gmail.com
                Article
                RomJOphthalmol-66-61
                10.22336/rjo.2022.13
                9022140
                35531448
                0b358e95-ba0c-4d1b-9653-53c4ed530211
                © The Authors.Romanian Society of Ophthalmology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 March 2022
                Categories
                General Articles

                b-hex,small pupil,phacoemulsification,pupil expansion
                b-hex, small pupil, phacoemulsification, pupil expansion

                Comments

                Comment on this article